Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

Oil

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2012 | 11:46 PM
  #46  
LARIAT 85's Avatar
LARIAT 85
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 22
From: Florence, SC
Originally Posted by Opossum
Ya sure it's not the other way around, most engine builders go the other way, as do I. When it really comes down to it an engine doesn't need any more oil pressure then is needed to provide enough flow. So the only thing a high pressure pump does is put in a heavier pressure relief spring and bypass it less. While a high volume pump is actually larger and will ensure oil gets where it needs to go faster and maintain enough volume to maintain a more steady oil pressure.
Yes, I'm sure. I never even heard of a "high pressure" oil pump before until I had my engine rebuilt. I was concerned about that at first, but when my trusted mechanic friend balanced and blueprinted my engine, he took the liberty of installing a standard volume, high pressure oil pump and assured me that it wouldn't hurt and would only help the engine to get the oil pumping quicker on a cold engine. (And maybe that is why he also recommended 5W-30 motor oil? I can't remember now, but what he said sounded good to me, and I have found that the 5W-30 oil is much easier to find around here than 10W-30 oil.) He explained to me that GM guys like to use the "high volume" oil pumps and that Ford engines didn't need them as much. Furthermore, the much larger gear on a high volume oil pump accelerates wear on the distributor and costs horsepower.

Melling Oil Pumps - YouTube
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2012 | 11:51 PM
  #47  
Opossum's Avatar
Opossum
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Originally Posted by Stangrcr1
There is no real need for a high pressure or high volume pump unless the clearances are wide. Stock pumps should provide all the pressure and volume required.

And here we get to flow through the bearings, etc.

Not enough flow and the bearings heat up. Too much flow and you build backpressure. This backpressure can break the pump and/or the shaft. This also increases the drag internal to the engine and reduced fuel efficiency.

A high volume pump bypasses more oil and heats the oil needlessly.
Some fair points;

A stock engine has little use for either, originally they size the pump for the original engine and all is good to do that again. Often however changes are made that put more demands on the oiling system, then a higher volume pump is a very good thing, and well better to error on the side of too much oil then too little.

A higher pressure pump will certainly put more strain on the shaft/gears driving it, and a higher volume pump will bypass more wasting energy heating the oil IF the engine doesn't use it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2012 | 11:53 PM
  #48  
Stangrcr1's Avatar
Stangrcr1
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 2
From: Marysville, WA
Nice video Lariat.

The only pump there that is not needlessly bypassing oil is the stock replacement pump.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2012 | 11:57 PM
  #49  
Stangrcr1's Avatar
Stangrcr1
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 2
From: Marysville, WA
Originally Posted by Opossum
Some fair points;

well better to error on the side of too much oil then too little.
Yes and no. Too much is heating the oil needlessly.

Originally Posted by Opossum
A higher pressure pump will certainly put more strain on the shaft/gears driving it, and a higher volume pump will bypass more wasting energy heating the oil IF the engine doesn't use it.
Both will bypass and heat the oil more than what is required. Both the high pressure and high volume in the video used high pressure springs. The higher the pressure, the more heat that is imparted to the oil in pumping and more that is bypassed directly to the pan.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2012 | 11:58 PM
  #50  
LARIAT 85's Avatar
LARIAT 85
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 22
From: Florence, SC
Originally Posted by Opossum
A higher pressure pump will certainly put more strain on the shaft/gears driving it, and a higher volume pump will bypass more wasting energy heating the oil IF the engine doesn't use it.
Not sure if I buy that, Chief. A high-pressure oil pump uses the same gear as stock oil pump. Whereas a high volume oil pump uses a much larger gear, and that puts more strain on the shaft/gears driving it.

Right?
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 12:05 AM
  #51  
Stangrcr1's Avatar
Stangrcr1
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 2
From: Marysville, WA
Originally Posted by LARIAT 85
Not sure if I buy that, Chief. A high-pressure oil pump uses the same gear as stock oil pump. Whereas a high volume oil pump uses a much larger gear, and that puts more strain on the shaft/gears driving it.

Right?
You talking to me? See who you quoted...

The high volume and the high pressure pumps in the video both use the same high pressure spring. The difference is the gear height. Both will put a higher load on the distributor gear, etc.

I use stock replacement pumps on my builds and shim the spring only if hot pressures are low.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 12:06 AM
  #52  
81-F-150-Explorer's Avatar
81-F-150-Explorer
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,786
Likes: 28
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by Opossum
Now clearly your just arguing to argue.

Buddy your reading way too much into some article you found on the net, assuming much more then it implies, and being WAAAAYYYY to picky about exact terminalogy that your not even using correctly.

ALL motor oils demonstrate non-newtonian properties, this does not make them "non-newtonian based oils"
You are using a wrong assumption again. SAE oils get thinner and lose viscocity as they heat up. They tend to be higher viscosity when cold. The Multigrade oils do the exact opposite. This is why multigrade oils were invented in the first place.


Nor does a non-newtonian fluid behave consistently as you seam to think, some flow rather well, some don't, some stir well, some don't. Non-newtonian simply refers to NOT-newtonian, as in NOT applying to the simple fluid flow models devised by Newton, few real world fluids are truely newtonian, incuding "single grade" oils and honey. Any fluid being non-newtonian is more a matter of degree then anything else, and really the term has more more to do with tricks sean on TV and YouTube then real fluid dynamics. In fact being non-newtonian is part of what makes a good oil.
I would agree with most of that except the youtube or tv tricks remark, so the question is why did you say this then?

Originally Posted by oppossum
Compare the thickness(viscosity) of your oil when you drain it from a hot engine with it's viscosity when you poor in fresh stuff at outside(starting) temps. It's thicker isn't it, ideally your oil never needs to be any thicker then it is when drained hot, even when cold. So the ideal oil is one that is the same viscosity at both temps.
So you are argueing that the fresh cold oil is thicker than what it is when drained hot. Sure fine I agree. What I have the problem with is this...

Originally Posted by oppossum
ideally your oil never needs to be any thicker then it is when drained hot, even when cold. So the ideal oil is one that is the same viscosity at both temps
If you said same thickness at both temps, I would agree that would be ideal. Same viscosity, I highly disagree with. 10w-30 and 10w-40 has the same or near the same exact thickness either when cold and hot, but different viscosity rates when hot for example. 5w-30 has lower viscosity when cold but the same viscosity when hot as 10w-30.

To put it a better way, I'm not arguing about flow rate. The faster it flows the better in most conditions especially when hot, as it cools faster. What the concern with is viscosity or how it lubricates that I do not agree with you on. 5w-30 the viscosity is too low for starting in lets say 90 degrees, the lubricant moves too quickly to do any good, therfore wear happens. This is why the owners manual recommends the viscosity it does as I also exampled with a picture above.

5w-30 does not mean it has a faster flow rate than 10w-30. It means it has a faster viscosity when cold. There are a lot of synthetics that flow twice as fast as dino oils of the same exact viscosity.


The same can be said about the term "viscosity" there's how it's used in oil commercials and how it's used in the lab where often modified by another defining term like the ones I already mentioned; kinematic, centipoise, centistoke, shear, etc.
Which is explained in the example I gave to you, I suggest everyone here to read it and make up their own minds.

Originally Posted by lariat 85
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>Originally Posted by 81-F-150-Explorer
I'm not the only one who say's that. That is Fords recommendation for temperature range, not mine... but you do not have to take my word for it, look at the manual.

10w-30 Recommended for between -10F and 90F only.

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I will agree with 81-F-150-Explorer here. My own 1985 Ford manual states the exact same information.
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>Originally Posted by 81-F-150-Explorer
In the mid 90's Ford started recommending oils in lower viscosities, 5w-30 recommendations are comon begining in '95 for example. There is a reason for this. Better measuring techniques of clearances using computers, and some of the first rollerbearing camshaft engines started rolling off the assymbly line in the '90s...

...Modern oil tech is the same tech that reduced or eliminated zinc from modern oils, because modern engines with rollerbearing camshafts do not need it, and zinc is a factor in reducing catalitic converter lifespan. The same zinc that is needed on our older engines to keep the camshaft lobes from wearing flat. Newer modern oils are not friendly to our older engines at all.

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I agreed with this, too. And I just can't bring myself to argue oil weights with a man that has over 700,000 miles on his engine.

But, I have also heard (and agree) with many of the same statements Opossum has brought up in this discussion.

<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>Originally Posted by Opossum
It's much more important that all the oil that can gets in all the places it can get as much and as quickly as possible, most of all at startup. Something like 95% of wear is at startup, ANY small amount of time removed from getting the oil where it needs to be is a VERY good thing. That and with a thicker oil then you need all your doing is creating drag and heat from pumping it around. Yes 40 can be good in a hot loose engine, I use it in my 460 as stated.

BUT it's the 10W that really kills ya, W doesn't stand for weight, it stands for Winter, which is silly, should be C for cold but ohh well I didn't create the standards. It's based on the viscosity of the oil at a cold temp, the other number is at a hot temp 210F. I can't remember the low temp. So the higher the W number the longer it takes to get oil to where it needs to be at startup. So why aren't all oils OW you ask, well that comes from the characteristics of dino oil, regular 30 weight oil if it had a W number would be 30W30 to make a 5W or 10W they add viscosity modifyers to the oil to change it's temperature charactaristics. These additives however are bad for the oils ability to lube and last as a whole so it's a trade off between faster oiling at startup and better oiling when warm and oil longevity. What they do to make a 10W40 is take a 10 weight oil and add enough stuff to it to make it act like a 40 when hot. The downside to this is that these additives break down, so as the oil breaks down it becomes a 10W30 then a 10W20, and eventually just a 10. Ohh and as they break down they become sludge, it's not the oil that actually breaks down it's the additives.

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
This is how I understand it, but I could be wrong:

"Confusion occurs because people think in terms of the oil thinning when it gets hot. They think this thinning with heat is the problem with motor oil. It would be more correct to think that oil thickens when it cools to room temperature and THIS is the problem. In fact this is the problem. It is said that 90 percent of engine wear occurs at start-up. If we are interested in engine longevity then we should concentrate our attention at reducing engine wear at start-up."


http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/motor-oil-101/

If I am understanding the website above correctly, both 5W-30 and 10W-30 oils have the same thickness at operating temperature. The only time the 5W-30 oil is "thinner" than a 10W-30 oil is at cold ("W") start-up conditions where you need it to be "thin." This allows the engine to get quick oil flow when it is started cold verses dry running until lubricant either warms up sufficiently or is finally forced through the engine oil system. The advantages of a lower W viscosity number is obvious. The quicker the oil flows cold, the less dry running. Less dry running means much less engine wear.
It would be more correct to say same viscosity, rather than thickness when hot. The 5w-30 will still be thinner when hot than the 10w-30.

Think of it more as stickier not as slippery when hot but flows faster, and not as sticky when cold, but flows slower.

Conclusions? The 5W-30 simply does not get as thick on cooling as the 10W-30, thus is better for your engine in colder temperatures and at start-up, where most of the engine wear occurs.

Maybe Opossum and 81-F-150-Explorer are both correct. Were the oil standards somehow different in the 1980s when the Ford manual was produced compared to today's oil standards?
Yes, in some ways they are improved and in some ways they are worse for older engines like ours, lack of ZDDP etc. The biggest thing is engine clearances and tolerances and that's why the recommendation for the change in viscosities in oil in the 1980s, compared with newer engines from the '90s up.

This would certainly make sense, as oils are today are better than they were 20 years ago, and additive packages have certainly changed over years as the car engines have changed.

I personally use Motorcraft 5W-30 Synthetic Blend motor oil along with a Motorcraft FL-1A oil filter, as this is what my trusted ASE-certified mechanic told me to use when he rebuilt my engine last year, along with a bottle of ZDDPlus added to the engine oil at every change to protect the flat-tappet camshaft. Maybe that is what Ford tells mechanics to use these days, or maybe it is because he used a high pressure (not high volume) oil pump in my engine. At any rate, my engine seems to run fine with no leaks so far and with quick, high oil pressure at start-up and good oil pressure when hot. I live in South Carolina where temperatures reach close to 100 in the summer with very mild winters, and I only drive my truck 1-2 times a week.
With an engine rebuild it changes the dynamics of things. It depends on the clearances used to build the new engine. More than likely if it's a fresh rebuild, you can use the 5w-30 with no problems whatsoever, with use of the Zddp additive, unless it has 1980 era type clearances. Most likely it doesn't, they probably built it to '90s specs. My concern with such low oil viscosities comes with original engines, or engines broke in on 10w30 or 10w40 with original clearances. Using lower than recomended viscosity will do damage at start up, just as much as using too high.

I keep hearing and reading conflicting information on this issue, so I am not confident if I am using the correct engine oil weight for my truck or not. I hope I find out in this thread because I really respect both Opossum's and 81-F-150-Explorer's opinions.
In your case with a brand new rebuild, you can go by your mechanics recommendations. After all he is the one who built it right?

With an older engine, it's not a good idea.


Think of it this way, putting 10w40 in a saturn will kill it's engine quick, because of the clearances being so tight the oil won't flow due to the viscosity. Putting 0w-30 in a truck used to 10w40 oil all it's life will have a similar effect because the oil will not "stick" to the parts when cold.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 12:07 AM
  #53  
Opossum's Avatar
Opossum
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Originally Posted by LARIAT 85
Yes, I'm sure. I never even heard of a "high pressure" oil pump before until I had my engine rebuilt. I was concerned about that at first, but when my trusted mechanic friend balanced and blueprinted my engine, he took the liberty of installing a standard volume, high pressure oil pump and assured me that it wouldn't hurt and would only help the engine to get the oil pumping quicker on a cold engine. (And maybe that is why he also recommended 5W-30 motor oil? I can't remember now, but what he said sounded good to me, and I have found that the 5W-30 oil is much easier to find around here than 10W-30 oil.) He explained to me that GM guys like to use the "high volume" oil pumps and that Ford engines didn't need them as much. Furthermore, the much larger gear on a high volume oil pump accelerates wear on the distributor and costs horsepower.
LARIAT, yeah I don't know of any common issues with windsor engines that would suggest the need for a higher volume pump on a rather stock engine and I don't know your engine. FE's though, they need help. High pressure on a windsor, hmmm, I could see a use if there was an added restriction between the pump and the bearings, like for instance a full flow oil cooler. That would ensure that the pressure drop accross the cooler didn't lower the pressure at the bearings too much. But as I said before it's a better safe then sorry thing. However your high pressure pump will do nothing to prevent oil pressure drops from high heat if that is a concern of yours.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 12:16 AM
  #54  
81-F-150-Explorer's Avatar
81-F-150-Explorer
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,786
Likes: 28
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by LARIAT 85
but when my trusted mechanic friend balanced and blueprinted my engine,

That makes a whole lot of difference right there in clearances. Forget what I said about '90's clearances, they are even tighter than that.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 12:24 AM
  #55  
Stangrcr1's Avatar
Stangrcr1
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 2
From: Marysville, WA
A truely balanced and blueprinted engine would allow a glass of water set on the air cleaner to have no ripples.

My Powerstroke was balanced to within 1/10th of a gram, but I can't say it is blueprinted.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 12:29 AM
  #56  
Opossum's Avatar
Opossum
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Originally Posted by LARIAT 85
Not sure if I buy that, Chief. A high-pressure oil pump uses the same gear as stock oil pump. Whereas a high volume oil pump uses a much larger gear, and that puts more strain on the shaft/gears driving it.

Right?
Well let's see, the quick answer is BOTH put more strain on the shaft/gears driving it, it's pressure x volume. So the more of either or both the more it takes to turn them. That said the high pressure only pump only takes more to turn when above the pressure at which the stock pumps bypass would open. While the high volume pump always takes more to turn. And pumps with both more volume and higher pressure spings have both issues.
Originally Posted by Stangrcr1
I use stock replacement pumps on my builds and shim the spring only if hot pressures are low.
That will do you NO good, shimming or putting in a higher pressure spring will do NOTHING to solve a low oil pressure issue caused by heat. The issue is a lack of volume compared to flow, not that the bypass is opening. This is why I error on the side of more volume on my builds and if worried about the shaft/gears driving it will use a stock/lower pressure bypass spring.


Edit instead of new post: "Blueprinted" is such an overused term, what does it really mean when rebuilding an older engine. The machinist didn't draw up new blueprints for the engine. No if good he just did a good job doing all that was needed to make sure everything had the right clearances, and charged a lot for it. I spent years in machine shops working for grumpy old machinists that really knew what they were doing, and they would all laugh at the term "blueprinted". I've had my grubby hands on and in engines that some are lucky to touch, Don and Josh might if they get around know where there are a few supercharged fuel injected 427 SOHC engines around town. Look closely, they have my fingerprints on and in them.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 01:18 AM
  #57  
Stangrcr1's Avatar
Stangrcr1
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 2
From: Marysville, WA
I used to own a completely original 426 Hemi. Sold it for other projects but I do get around. I have played with engines you and the general public will never see.

I still don't think you get the pressure vs volume. None of those builds had bearing issues, just lower "than I like" pressure on the gage at idle/hot. Volume was not an issue.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 01:23 AM
  #58  
Stangrcr1's Avatar
Stangrcr1
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 2
From: Marysville, WA
Originally Posted by Opossum
Well let's see, the quick answer is BOTH put more strain on the shaft/gears driving it, it's pressure x volume. So the more of either or both the more it takes to turn them. That said the high pressure only pump only takes more to turn when above the pressure at which the stock pumps bypass would open. While the high volume pump always takes more to turn. And pumps with both more volume and higher pressure spings have both issues.
Not exactly. In reference to the Melling pumps in the video, the high pressure and the high volume both use high pressure springs. The high pressure pump with the stock style gears will take less power to turn than the high volume. The high volume will take even more power since it will be bypassing much more oil.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 01:45 AM
  #59  
Opossum's Avatar
Opossum
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Originally Posted by Stangrcr1
I used to own a completely original 426 Hemi.
Hemi, pffft eveyone has one of those.
Originally Posted by Stangrcr1
I still don't think you get the pressure vs volume.
What's not to get?
Originally Posted by Stangrcr1
Not exactly. In reference to the Melling pumps in the video, the high pressure and the high volume both use high pressure springs. The high pressure pump with the stock style gears will take less power to turn than the high volume. The high volume will take even more power since it will be bypassing much more oil.
Isn't that what I said? But you can put a lower bypass spring with a high volume pump, better yet you can on some engines have the bypass seperate from the pump. Better yet you can have the bypass go to a bypass filter and/or cooler and/or spray bar and/or accumulator etc, getting the best of it all.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4x4countryboy
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
84
Nov 16, 2012 05:05 PM
RAPR
6.2L V8
11
Jan 30, 2012 11:25 AM
aggiecowboy1987
Oil & Lubrication
4
Jun 29, 2010 12:55 AM
93nighthawk
Aerostar
18
Sep 9, 2009 12:16 AM
Milwaukee1979F150
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
21
Apr 17, 2008 10:28 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE