Oil
Melling Oil Pumps - YouTube
And here we get to flow through the bearings, etc.
Not enough flow and the bearings heat up. Too much flow and you build backpressure. This backpressure can break the pump and/or the shaft. This also increases the drag internal to the engine and reduced fuel efficiency.
A high volume pump bypasses more oil and heats the oil needlessly.
A stock engine has little use for either, originally they size the pump for the original engine and all is good to do that again. Often however changes are made that put more demands on the oiling system, then a higher volume pump is a very good thing, and well better to error on the side of too much oil then too little.
A higher pressure pump will certainly put more strain on the shaft/gears driving it, and a higher volume pump will bypass more wasting energy heating the oil IF the engine doesn't use it.
Both will bypass and heat the oil more than what is required. Both the high pressure and high volume in the video used high pressure springs. The higher the pressure, the more heat that is imparted to the oil in pumping and more that is bypassed directly to the pan.
Right?
The high volume and the high pressure pumps in the video both use the same high pressure spring. The difference is the gear height. Both will put a higher load on the distributor gear, etc.
I use stock replacement pumps on my builds and shim the spring only if hot pressures are low.
Buddy your reading way too much into some article you found on the net, assuming much more then it implies, and being WAAAAYYYY to picky about exact terminalogy that your not even using correctly.
ALL motor oils demonstrate non-newtonian properties, this does not make them "non-newtonian based oils"
To put it a better way, I'm not arguing about flow rate. The faster it flows the better in most conditions especially when hot, as it cools faster. What the concern with is viscosity or how it lubricates that I do not agree with you on. 5w-30 the viscosity is too low for starting in lets say 90 degrees, the lubricant moves too quickly to do any good, therfore wear happens. This is why the owners manual recommends the viscosity it does as I also exampled with a picture above.
5w-30 does not mean it has a faster flow rate than 10w-30. It means it has a faster viscosity when cold. There are a lot of synthetics that flow twice as fast as dino oils of the same exact viscosity.
I'm not the only one who say's that. That is Fords recommendation for temperature range, not mine... but you do not have to take my word for it, look at the manual.
10w-30 Recommended for between -10F and 90F only.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I will agree with 81-F-150-Explorer here. My own 1985 Ford manual states the exact same information.
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>Originally Posted by 81-F-150-Explorer
In the mid 90's Ford started recommending oils in lower viscosities, 5w-30 recommendations are comon begining in '95 for example. There is a reason for this. Better measuring techniques of clearances using computers, and some of the first rollerbearing camshaft engines started rolling off the assymbly line in the '90s...
...Modern oil tech is the same tech that reduced or eliminated zinc from modern oils, because modern engines with rollerbearing camshafts do not need it, and zinc is a factor in reducing catalitic converter lifespan. The same zinc that is needed on our older engines to keep the camshaft lobes from wearing flat. Newer modern oils are not friendly to our older engines at all.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I agreed with this, too. And I just can't bring myself to argue oil weights with a man that has over 700,000 miles on his engine.

But, I have also heard (and agree) with many of the same statements Opossum has brought up in this discussion.
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>Originally Posted by Opossum
It's much more important that all the oil that can gets in all the places it can get as much and as quickly as possible, most of all at startup. Something like 95% of wear is at startup, ANY small amount of time removed from getting the oil where it needs to be is a VERY good thing. That and with a thicker oil then you need all your doing is creating drag and heat from pumping it around. Yes 40 can be good in a hot loose engine, I use it in my 460 as stated.
BUT it's the 10W that really kills ya, W doesn't stand for weight, it stands for Winter, which is silly, should be C for cold but ohh well I didn't create the standards. It's based on the viscosity of the oil at a cold temp, the other number is at a hot temp 210F. I can't remember the low temp. So the higher the W number the longer it takes to get oil to where it needs to be at startup. So why aren't all oils OW you ask, well that comes from the characteristics of dino oil, regular 30 weight oil if it had a W number would be 30W30 to make a 5W or 10W they add viscosity modifyers to the oil to change it's temperature charactaristics. These additives however are bad for the oils ability to lube and last as a whole so it's a trade off between faster oiling at startup and better oiling when warm and oil longevity. What they do to make a 10W40 is take a 10 weight oil and add enough stuff to it to make it act like a 40 when hot. The downside to this is that these additives break down, so as the oil breaks down it becomes a 10W30 then a 10W20, and eventually just a 10. Ohh and as they break down they become sludge, it's not the oil that actually breaks down it's the additives.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
This is how I understand it, but I could be wrong:
"Confusion occurs because people think in terms of the oil thinning when it gets hot. They think this thinning with heat is the problem with motor oil. It would be more correct to think that oil thickens when it cools to room temperature and THIS is the problem. In fact this is the problem. It is said that 90 percent of engine wear occurs at start-up. If we are interested in engine longevity then we should concentrate our attention at reducing engine wear at start-up."
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/motor-oil-101/
If I am understanding the website above correctly, both 5W-30 and 10W-30 oils have the same thickness at operating temperature. The only time the 5W-30 oil is "thinner" than a 10W-30 oil is at cold ("W") start-up conditions where you need it to be "thin." This allows the engine to get quick oil flow when it is started cold verses dry running until lubricant either warms up sufficiently or is finally forced through the engine oil system. The advantages of a lower W viscosity number is obvious. The quicker the oil flows cold, the less dry running. Less dry running means much less engine wear.
Think of it more as stickier not as slippery when hot but flows faster, and not as sticky when cold, but flows slower.
Maybe Opossum and 81-F-150-Explorer are both correct. Were the oil standards somehow different in the 1980s when the Ford manual was produced compared to today's oil standards?
I personally use Motorcraft 5W-30 Synthetic Blend motor oil along with a Motorcraft FL-1A oil filter, as this is what my trusted ASE-certified mechanic told me to use when he rebuilt my engine last year, along with a bottle of ZDDPlus added to the engine oil at every change to protect the flat-tappet camshaft. Maybe that is what Ford tells mechanics to use these days, or maybe it is because he used a high pressure (not high volume) oil pump in my engine. At any rate, my engine seems to run fine with no leaks so far and with quick, high oil pressure at start-up and good oil pressure when hot. I live in South Carolina where temperatures reach close to 100 in the summer with very mild winters, and I only drive my truck 1-2 times a week.
With an older engine, it's not a good idea.
Think of it this way, putting 10w40 in a saturn will kill it's engine quick, because of the clearances being so tight the oil won't flow due to the viscosity. Putting 0w-30 in a truck used to 10w40 oil all it's life will have a similar effect because the oil will not "stick" to the parts when cold.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
That makes a whole lot of difference right there in clearances. Forget what I said about '90's clearances, they are even tighter than that.
My Powerstroke was balanced to within 1/10th of a gram, but I can't say it is blueprinted.
Edit instead of new post: "Blueprinted" is such an overused term, what does it really mean when rebuilding an older engine. The machinist didn't draw up new blueprints for the engine. No if good he just did a good job doing all that was needed to make sure everything had the right clearances, and charged a lot for it. I spent years in machine shops working for grumpy old machinists that really knew what they were doing, and they would all laugh at the term "blueprinted". I've had my grubby hands on and in engines that some are lucky to touch, Don and Josh might if they get around know where there are a few supercharged fuel injected 427 SOHC engines around town. Look closely, they have my fingerprints on and in them.
I still don't think you get the pressure vs volume. None of those builds had bearing issues, just lower "than I like" pressure on the gage at idle/hot. Volume was not an issue.
What's not to get?




