V10 vs 7.3IDI
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Plover, WI
If you like enjoying the scenery and sticking to the slow lane, go for an IDI. It'll get the job done, and still get double digit mpg. Also, if your trips are during warmer months, run WMO so that you save on fuel. I love my V10, but still miss my old 85 6.9, it was a great truck that never really needed any work.
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 2
From: CA Bay Area
Fact that 7.3 is not original Ford engine brings only spice.
For years I have been driving 44 HP VW pickup. That thing was annoying on acceleration and top speeds, but than I did not have to worry where to keep the gas pedal >>> it had only 2 usable positions. Having no CC I cut a wood stick that would hold the gas pedal firmly on the floor for long drives.
But 30 years ago my pickup was averaging firm 35 mpg and the models still on the road are holding higher value than original MSRP.
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 10,080
Likes: 5
From: Backwoods of Snowflake AZ
I say choose the 6.8L triton V10 these engines speak for itself there is no way they can not do better then the IDI. I love the body style of those years but I have the V10 is a killer when it comes to performance.
Trav
Trav
Hotshot
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 13,484
Likes: 42
From: Stevens Point, WI
Wouldn't that be the ONLY reliable diesel Ford put in their trucks to date?
Fact that 7.3 is not original Ford engine brings only spice.
For years I have been driving 44 HP VW pickup. That thing was annoying on acceleration and top speeds, but than I did not have to worry where to keep the gas pedal >>> it had only 2 usable positions. Having no CC I cut a wood stick that would hold the gas pedal firmly on the floor for long drives.
But 30 years ago my pickup was averaging firm 35 mpg and the models still on the road are holding higher value than original MSRP.
Fact that 7.3 is not original Ford engine brings only spice.
For years I have been driving 44 HP VW pickup. That thing was annoying on acceleration and top speeds, but than I did not have to worry where to keep the gas pedal >>> it had only 2 usable positions. Having no CC I cut a wood stick that would hold the gas pedal firmly on the floor for long drives.
But 30 years ago my pickup was averaging firm 35 mpg and the models still on the road are holding higher value than original MSRP.
Hard to say, we put on over 450K miles on our 1986 6.9 IDI and only replaced a high pressure pump on it.
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC Canada
Getting back to the OP's original question, I would ask what he means by "looking to downgrade". Why? Is the fuel mileage to onerous? Are you needing some cash, so wanting to trade down and have a little extra money? Is there something about the super dutys that you don't like so are looking to go back to the older trucks?
Frankly, at the intended useage you mentioned, the number of miles and size of trailer, sticking with the v10 seems logical. If there are other factors at play, then that will help us to make a recommendation to you.
Frankly, at the intended useage you mentioned, the number of miles and size of trailer, sticking with the v10 seems logical. If there are other factors at play, then that will help us to make a recommendation to you.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
makomaker
Modular V10 (6.8l)
13
Oct 4, 2011 09:12 AM
superduty4x4
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
4
Jul 1, 2009 12:33 PM
