When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Okay this https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...ds-anyone.html most of us here know about head studs and have used them plenty of times. I have never heard of a need for machining the deck to compensate for studs or that studs transfer the load different? I just figured someone here would know the true answer to the studs. I know its not IDI related but you are the best people for the job
Okay this https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...ds-anyone.html most of us here know about head studs and have used them plenty of times. I have never heard of a need for machining the deck to compensate for studs or that studs transfer the load different? I just figured someone here would know the true answer to the studs. I know its not IDI related but you are the best people for the job
Deck surface isnt the problem, its bore deflection. The deck surface has a whole lot more support than the cylinder bores, and isnt really an issue with studs.
Torque is torque, doesn't matter whether it's a stud or a bolt. Torqued to the same specs the block will have no clue there's any difference.
Your right about torque being torque, but where you wrong is about thread pitch... And thats the difference between studs and the factory bolts. The bolts are a Course thread, and clamping load with a course thread is less than clamping load with a fine thread. There is a huge difference between 90 ft/lbs with headbolts, and 90 ft/lbs with head studs... Like 40% more clamping load...
I saw an article about using torque plates when honing, but i've never heard anything like what that guy was going on about...
Its best to torque plate hone your engine with your studs set at the torque your going to have your heads to. That way your bores will be perfectly round when your engine is running.
My studs are torqued to 150 ft/lbs and while not ideal on the factory setup (bore deflection issues) mine is holding up fine. Id rather have my gaskets hold and have a little blowby, than be chancing the HG's blowing everytime I boost...
That is something I have never heard of before. Sure stock bolts are corse thread, but as ARP states that sometimes up to 60% of the final torque is just to overcome the friction of the threads, combinre that with the twist in the bolt you are getting real poor clamping force with bolts.
I think the bore deflection is bull. I could see how it would make sence if all studs were running in different directions, but they pull strait up, what could possibly deflect? And with the studs you get a more even torque over the whole surface of the head, so every bolt is pulled the same and has an even TRUE torque over every stud, unlike the incosistant torque of bolts which should cause more deflection due to the incosistancy.
The reason for the bore deflection, even beyond the idea that the studs/bolts pull "straight" is that the casting is un-uneven throughout the block. Pulling straight on something doesnt necessarily mean that the forces being spread throughout the casting are linear. You would be right if the block was a solid piece of cast or billet... But its not. The bores are the biggest unsupported part in the block and therefore the most likely spot to deflect under load.
The real question is, how much... And what is too much... Like I said, Im at 150ft/lbs and so far Im fine. Next IDI I build will be torque plate honed, this one wasnt an option.
Been doing this for twenty years now and several of them in a machine shop and never heard that one before. More than likely some engineer decided he needed to make more money and came up with the idea.
If that block flexed that much with just a a guy squeezing it (and not even from a postion where you can get some power) then how the hell do cummins hold togther?