Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

H-Pipe vs X-Pipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2011 | 03:29 PM
  #1  
bwigfield's Avatar
bwigfield
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Talking H-Pipe vs X-Pipe

Hello everybody. I hope your all enjoying the holiday season.

So I'm pretty sure I'll get getting a set of headers for Christmas (box showed up that had Hedman on the side before my wife wrapped it up) and its goe me thinking about exhaust systems.

What I'm working with is a 1983 F-250 with a 302. I've replaced the stock intake manifold with an Edelbrock Performer RPM intake and replaced the stock carb with an Edelbrock 600CFM carb. I know the carb is over sized for this truck but I got the intake and the carb used for about $100 bucks. The combo is running much better than the stock intake and carb, though when the funds are available I'd like to get an appropriately sized carb on the old girl. The headers that are going on next are Hedman Hedders 89358 - Hedman Elite Hedders - Overview - SummitRacing.com . The previous owner removed the Cats and installed a true dual setup with 2 1/4" pipes and some cheap glass packs.

So my question is what does everyone thinkg about this H-pipe

Hedman Hedders 18811 - Hedman Equalizer Tube Kits - Overview - SummitRacing.com

versus this x-pipe

MagnaFlow 10790 - MagnaFlow Tru-X Stainless Steel Crossover Pipes - Overview - SummitRacing.com

From what I've read an H-pipe is supposed to give a lower tone? Id that correct? Will one or the other offer better performance? Does anyone have experience with either of these parts? Relevant experience? Any opinion welcome and thanks for taking the time to read my post.

Also completely unrelated but just yesterday I got my new dash cluster installed with the factory tach. Replaced the bulbs with white leds and got rid of the blue diffusers. Looks great. I'll try and get a pic up as soon as I can get the pictures off of the wifes camera.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2011 | 08:10 PM
  #2  
cadunkle's Avatar
cadunkle
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 25
From: NJ
You have a basically stock motor so performance will be virtually the same. H will be slightly lower pitch and (in my opinion) sound better than an X. Either will be quieter than true duals. If it were my I'd probably just make my own H pipe. Also note, if you're doing stainless (like that X you linked) it's different than welding regular aluminized pipe.

Personally I have a higher HP 460 and run true duals with no crossover. I like the sound and am not worried about the small power loss at my power level, I don't mind losing whatever small amount for easier removal and installation with no crossover, but I run side pipes which would complicate a crossover.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2011 | 08:27 PM
  #3  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,977
Likes: 2,733
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
600 cfm is just right for the 302. It should be a vacuum secondary type carb, and if it is, it sizes itself somewhat. It only gives what the engine will take at any given throttle opening.

You are dreaming about this exhaust system, but I can tell you have never even looked under your truck to see how you are going to run it. You have to juggle performance gains versus the practicality of physically installing it.

You probably have faith that if a company sells headers for your vehicle, they will fit properly and it will be obvious how to hook them up underneath. Wrong. They come out very low underneath, and you or the exhuast shop has to figure out how to run them to the rear. If you leave the exhaust system low, sure you could add a h or x pipe, but how in the world are you going to work on the tranny if you need to, and if you leave the system low, it hangs up on everything and looks terrible standing beside the truck with all those pipes showing underneath.

The factory tucks the exhaust system up high on the passenger side, since the gas tank is in the way on the driver's side. It may be easier to try and bring the headers together over on the pass side and run one large pipe tucked up high inside the frame.

There are several ways to do it, but I think a x pipe or a h pipe is not what you need to worry about.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2011 | 08:33 PM
  #4  
cadunkle's Avatar
cadunkle
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 25
From: NJ
Note Dave is correct on carb sizing. While I don't care for Edelbrock and it'll leave power on the table, 600 CFM is a good match for a 302 though the performer RPM not so much on an otherwise stock truck engine. Regardless, you got the setup for $100 so you're doing fine. Run what you have and don't waste money changing carb or intake, there are more gains to be had elsewhere.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2011 | 10:52 PM
  #5  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
The E'brock 600 is a good carb. It is actually a Carter AFB design and is a vacuum secondary as Dave said, so it will size itself. It isn't too much carb for a 302, so you should be fine.

And, as Dave said, putting any kind of X or H pipe on these trucks with headers is going to be a problem as there isn't enough room. I know all the literature says you should do it as there's low-end power to be had, but it isn't going to be easy. I'd suggest spending your money on a true dual system with mufflers that flow well and give a low tone, and from what I've read and heard the Magnaflows would be my choice.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2011 | 08:36 PM
  #6  
Terpfords's Avatar
Terpfords
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
What they said.

600cfm good.

Performer RPM is big for a stock motor, but will perform better than stock. You can grow into it.

Headers will make a big improvement, but as they stated, the exhaust has challenges. What is important with exhaust is velocity and scavenging is the bonus. Only a Dyno or race track can tell you which will perform better. Some exhausts like X's some like H's. I would go with a X, but from a cost perspective the money might be spent better else where.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2011 | 09:54 PM
  #7  
cadunkle's Avatar
cadunkle
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 25
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Gary Lewis
And, as Dave said, putting any kind of X or H pipe on these trucks with headers is going to be a problem as there isn't enough room. I know all the literature says you should do it as there's low-end power to be had, but it isn't going to be easy.
No room? What are you talking about?? Most of these trucks with duals have both pipes down the passenger side next to each other. You really only have two choices, go in on passenger side between frame and driveshaft or go out and have no crossover or a worse scenario. Very few trucks go out to true dual side pipes. With the pipes next to each other on passenger side a H or X is cake, they're right next to each other!
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2011 | 10:11 PM
  #8  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
Originally Posted by cadunkle
No room? What are you talking about?? Most of these trucks with duals have both pipes down the passenger side next to each other. You really only have two choices, go in on passenger side between frame and driveshaft or go out and have no crossover or a worse scenario. Very few trucks go out to true dual side pipes. With the pipes next to each other on passenger side a H or X is cake, they're right next to each other!
Yes, and no. Yes, there is room if you do the X or H well down the pipe. But, according to everything I've read the real benefit is crossing over immediately after the headers. So while you can do it the benefits of doing it later are minimal.
 

Last edited by Gary Lewis; Dec 21, 2011 at 08:21 AM. Reason: Fix typo
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 08:14 AM
  #9  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,977
Likes: 2,733
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
I read something somewhere, but have never tried it. Again we are talking small gains here compared to being able to actually do it. But they said once you get the system on without the crossover pipe, paint the system from the headers back a couple of feet with regular spray paint. Then run the engine, and where the paint burns off first, that's where the crossover pipe needs to go. Like I said, I have never tried it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2012 | 10:18 AM
  #10  
lavatan's Avatar
lavatan
Laughing Gas
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 997
Likes: 2
From: Rock Valley, IA
I know I'm bringing up an old thread but for those of you that run true duals did you have the pipes custom bent or did you order them prefab? Also, Franklin, we use that trick on the dirt track car to know where to cut off the pipes, so yes, that is where the X or H-pipe would be installed.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2012 | 10:30 AM
  #11  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
The ones that were on the '82 I sold were custom bent, but by a PO. And, the feedback I got from several on the forum was that prefab never fits quite right and takes some bending to make them fit. But, I'll let them chime in and tell you that themselves.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 09:22 AM
  #12  
Terpfords's Avatar
Terpfords
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Hooker makes a set mandrel bent 2 1/4 and I believe Dynomax or Blackjack make some nonmandrel in 2 1/4, both exit behind the passenger rear wheel like stock. Where they run parallel down the pass. side you could place an X or H.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 10:07 AM
  #13  
lavatan's Avatar
lavatan
Laughing Gas
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 997
Likes: 2
From: Rock Valley, IA
I found these:

Dynomax 89000 Exhaust System | Auto Parts Warehouse

but I'm afraid they won't work with the side tank in place...

This looks a little closer to what I'm looking for:

Flowmaster 815936 U-Fit Exhaust System | Auto Parts Warehouse

Opinions, thoughts?
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 10:48 AM
  #14  
Terpfords's Avatar
Terpfords
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
If you want to make your own, those kits will help, this http://m.summitracing.com/parts/HOK-16565HKR is what I was referring to .
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 10:51 AM
  #15  
lavatan's Avatar
lavatan
Laughing Gas
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 997
Likes: 2
From: Rock Valley, IA
Thank you Terp. +Rep to you. That is exactly what I was looking for.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yabadaba
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Nov 2, 2014 11:54 AM
Captain Mel
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
16
Sep 24, 2013 11:09 AM
rsh27921
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
Jan 8, 2013 03:49 PM
1966Tbird
Exhaust Systems
14
May 19, 2009 08:30 PM
70bronc
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
19
Jul 18, 2002 10:18 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE