Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What all would a transplant of a 4.6 v8 into a OBS truck entail?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-09-2011, 03:36 AM
SideWinder4.9l's Avatar
SideWinder4.9l
SideWinder4.9l is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eastern Ky
Posts: 8,838
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
What all would a transplant of a 4.6 v8 into a OBS truck entail?

This is a question of sheer curiousity......Seeing as those engines are literally a dime a dozen in my neck of the woods....

But getting into logistics-

Going from a 300 (145hp/265lb-ft) to a 281 (210hp/270lb-ft) would automatically add 65hp to the truck, and ~5lb-ft of torque.

Now, given the fact that ONLY the 1992-1995 Romeo 4.6l's utilizes the same bellhousing as a 300,302, and 351w....That means OBD-1 Diagnostics (Which is fine by me, btw)....That helps in the fact of using my M5OD tranny.....(Only difference I could honestly see being an issue is flywheel/pressure plate, etc...But overall, would seemingly mate up)

1991-1992 Romeo 4.6l engines used the Block casting #-F1AE
1993-1994 Romeo 4.6l engines used the Block casting #F2VE
1994-1005 Romeo 4.6l engines used the Block casting F4VE (Identical cast as the previous F2VE blocks)

Seeing as the radiator/engine mounts would be easily fixated.....


It seems that once I got the correct flywheel (If there's a difference, stll researching that), the engine mounts, radiator, and the wiring sorted out..It'd be fine.....


Any info out there? I know I'll get a LOT of flak for this blasphemy...But again, I'm just curious....

Also, what mods can actually be done to the "Older" 4.6's?

I know, I know..."Get a 302/351w for this crap"...Sure...Thats great...THEN I STILL have to make it a mass air engine to accept a milder cam...Just saying....

This seems to be a straightforward endeavor, IF you have a fully assembled engine, some wiring diagrams/schematics...And know how...

And as for the engine wiring its' self...What all is needed there, besides lifting the entire harness off as one piece, and taking the computer also...? Anything beyond that, and pinning the wires into the cluster (Which has its own question)...?

Cluster question....Would the cluster from a 1992+ crown victoria, etc actually physically fit? Seems if so, or with a small amount of massaging....It'd be a simple thing....


Now...Gimme some input on this..Good, bad points...Just bounce this idea for a while....Then lets see what goes from there...

Thanks all-
Wes
(Flame suit on)
 
  #2  
Old 10-09-2011, 04:23 AM
ArdWrknTrk's Avatar
ArdWrknTrk
ArdWrknTrk is offline
pedant

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EXTREME southwest CT
Posts: 23,576
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts


I have nothing for you but want to subscribe to see what comes of it,
Do you know what the ratings were for this engine in police cars?
 
  #3  
Old 10-09-2011, 05:45 AM
SideWinder4.9l's Avatar
SideWinder4.9l
SideWinder4.9l is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eastern Ky
Posts: 8,838
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
Jim-What year were you wondering about?

And here is some SOLID inspiration...
New member with a project: 1995 2WD F150 with 4.6 SOHC and single turbo - F150online Forums
 
  #4  
Old 10-09-2011, 06:51 AM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I remember PJF , i think in the end he took the turbo off ?? , he had some posts on this forum to you might be able to find....Lew
 
  #5  
Old 10-09-2011, 06:55 AM
SideWinder4.9l's Avatar
SideWinder4.9l
SideWinder4.9l is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eastern Ky
Posts: 8,838
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by lew52
I remember PJF , i think in the end he took the turbo off ?? , he had some posts on this forum to you might be able to find....Lew
In your honest opinion Lew...Would this be a worthwhile thing to undertake?

I mean it seems simple enough for a simple engine swap....

How hard is the wiring to get in? And what all would that entail?

Btw-Did he go by the same screenname on here?
 
  #6  
Old 10-09-2011, 07:01 AM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah i think he used the same name , i don't know , i never cared much for the 4.6 , you can make alot more HP with the 302 , i hated it when they put the 4.6 in the mustang , but thats just me , i like built 302s , but it was an interesting build....
 
  #7  
Old 10-09-2011, 07:05 AM
SideWinder4.9l's Avatar
SideWinder4.9l
SideWinder4.9l is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eastern Ky
Posts: 8,838
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by lew52
Yeah i think he used the same name , i don't know , i never cared much for the 4.6 , you can make alot more HP with the 302 , i hated it when they put the 4.6 in the mustang , but thats just me , i like built 302s , but it was an interesting build....
Eh.....I'm just not a 302 fan.....And I like the sound of the modular engines better to be honest.....

I can probably get the necessary parts for next nothing....There's 4 JY's that deals with NOTHING but crown vics, etc...
 
  #8  
Old 10-09-2011, 09:49 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,951
Likes: 0
Received 979 Likes on 773 Posts
Originally Posted by SideWinder4.9l
Going from a 300 (145hp/265lb-ft) to a 281 (210hp/270lb-ft) would automatically add 65hp to the truck, and ~5lb-ft of torque.
Ok... but the 4.6 is even more of a screamer than the 5.0 so that TQ peak is well up the tach.

Originally Posted by SideWinder4.9l
I know I'll get a LOT of flak for this blasphemy...But again, I'm just curious....
No blasphemy here.. it's not like you're interested in putting a SBC in it or something.

Originally Posted by SideWinder4.9l
I know, I know..."Get a 302/351w for this crap"...Sure...Thats great...THEN I STILL have to make it a mass air engine to accept a milder cam...
No.. not true at all.. where do you get that idea?

Originally Posted by SideWinder4.9l
This seems to be a straightforward endeavor, IF you have a fully assembled engine, some wiring diagrams/schematics...And know how...
Same applies to swapping in just about any motor.. though a 5.0 or 5.8 would be less work.

Originally Posted by SideWinder4.9l
Now...Gimme some input on this..Good, bad points...Just bounce this idea for a while....Then lets see what goes from there...
The only Pro for a 4.6 for you seems to be it's availability, other than that it will be more complicated than swapping in an EFI windsor family motor.

Pros for the 5.0 and 5.8 are going to be the relative ease of installation since these motors were stock so all the parts are available from a donor truck. Power is no contest here either, you can get upwards of 300hp from a 5.0 or 5.8 using the stock truck SD EFI system and it doesn't take much to get there, really just a cam and exhaust to get into the 260-275hp range and GT40 heads will put it the rest of the way. And more displacement = more torque so both these motors will out muscle the 4.6. Wiring is also going to be relatively simple, you could even use the existing 4.9 harness and graft on another set of injectors plugs and then just plug in a V8 EEC.. everything else is the same. There was somebody on here last year that did an I6 to V8 swap using the I6 harness.
 
  #9  
Old 10-09-2011, 11:06 AM
BRay09's Avatar
BRay09
BRay09 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Elyria, OH
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I agree with conanski on this. I've driven a 4.6 and it was comparable to my mildly built 5.8 with about the same mileage. Im still running the stock SD too
 
  #10  
Old 10-09-2011, 01:55 PM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
All i can say is a 4.6 mustang was no match for a 5.0 fox body , stock to stock....
 
  #11  
Old 10-09-2011, 05:52 PM
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
TexasGuy001 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,920
Received 206 Likes on 166 Posts
Originally Posted by lew52
All i can say is a 4.6 mustang was no match for a 5.0 fox body , stock to stock....
I second this.
 
  #12  
Old 10-09-2011, 05:54 PM
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
TexasGuy001 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,920
Received 206 Likes on 166 Posts
In my opinion thus swap would be a waste of time. Just swap it to a 5.0. Its alot less work and better.
 
  #13  
Old 10-09-2011, 06:07 PM
Edgethis's Avatar
Edgethis
Edgethis is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tobyhanma, PA
Posts: 6,325
Received 387 Likes on 292 Posts
While I don't think that the modular swap would be anything but a hassle, there's no way I'd ever swap out a 300 for a 302. I would swap for a 351w, but a 302 just isn't worth the time when a 351 is so much more for the same work.
 
  #14  
Old 10-09-2011, 06:40 PM
Cory281's Avatar
Cory281
Cory281 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lew52
All i can say is a 4.6 mustang was no match for a 5.0 fox body , stock to stock....
A 1995-1996 Mustang is a complete drivers race. The 1996 4.6 actually had 5 more torque then the 5.0 had in 1995. They had the same horse power at 210, correct me if I'm wrong. Both those cars ran low 15's stock, that is all a 5.0 fox body ran as well. The notch could hit high 14's, but that is only because it is lighter then the hatch.

One thing that you can do on a older 4.6 is the PI head/intake swap. The 99+ Mustangs had better flowing heads and intake, that's where the bump from 215hp to 260hp and 302 torque(I think) from 1998-1999. The older 4.6's will get a little bit more power from the PI heads and intake swap because of their compression ratio is higher then the 99+ engines.

I can't really help with the swap though, I bet that would be a lot of work. But if you really want to do it and have the tools then go for it, man.

Let me know if I can be more help.
 
  #15  
Old 10-09-2011, 07:30 PM
jas88's Avatar
jas88
jas88 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,314
Likes: 0
Received 360 Likes on 290 Posts
I've got a 1997 4.6L sitting in my '91 Bronco right now, all the fab work is done and it is bolted in. I just need to get on the wiring.
 


Quick Reply: What all would a transplant of a 4.6 v8 into a OBS truck entail?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM.