65 ford crewcab
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
I was thinking the same thing thats a big truck for a 302.... I would like to have this truck but its a little out of my budget and a little far away.....
Trending Topics
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026
Brett Foote
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time
Joe Kucinski
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Rusty 63
They came stock with a 300 inline 6. 
The 300 I-6 was an option as was the 352 2V in F100/350's.
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
I-6's usually make there power at a lower rpm and have more torque where the 302 is more of a revving motor. I'm sure it would be fine but that truck is a lot more weight than the mustang the engine came out of.... that truck just seems like it should have a big block to me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jhooch
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
Oct 20, 2013 04:47 PM
78_f800crewcab4x4
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Feb 9, 2010 10:18 PM
Fordworth
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
39
Feb 19, 2009 11:36 PM
