Notices

302 clevor engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 09:14 PM
  #1  
skates21's Avatar
skates21
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
302 clevor engine?

Is it worth it to build ?
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2011 | 01:36 AM
  #2  
cjben's Avatar
cjben
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,335
Likes: 6
From: Midwest
Club FTE Silver Member

not unless you are just wanting something unique. There are pretty much limitless options for the 351w these days,and can be built cheaper than the clevor.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2011 | 08:29 AM
  #3  
skates21's Avatar
skates21
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Thanks I heard that from a few people so far.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2011 | 11:18 AM
  #4  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,927
Likes: 1,494
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Aftermarket Windsor heads that match and exceed what the old Cleveland heads did are plentiful and cheap, and they don't require a special intake manifold or any of the modifications that the cleveland heads need to work on a Windsor block.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2011 | 01:15 PM
  #5  
skates21's Avatar
skates21
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Conanski
Aftermarket Windsor heads that match and exceed what the old Cleveland heads did are plentiful and cheap, and they don't require a special intake manifold or any of the modifications that the cleveland heads need to work on a Windsor block.
How would they do on a 302?
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 03:05 AM
  #6  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,007
Likes: 202
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

You can build it up like the original Boss 302, which was pretty weak up to about 4000 rpm, then it would scream up to 8000 rpm, when the bottom end would disintegrate. They were really only good for lightweight cars, like a Mustang, on high speed tracks.

I collected parts for building up a "Boss" 351 using B&A's Track Boss manifold and a pair of Australian 2V heads. Then I found out the cost to machine and build up the heads so they had good flow was more than what a good set of modern aluminum heads, complete, would cost. So I have some parts I don't know what to do with, including a pair of Aussie heads in need of complete revuild and a set of those funky valve cover/stud stabilizers that only fit Cleveland style heads.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 12:06 PM
  #7  
skates21's Avatar
skates21
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by xlt4wd90
You can build it up like the original Boss 302, which was pretty weak up to about 4000 rpm, then it would scream up to 8000 rpm, when the bottom end would disintegrate. They were really only good for lightweight cars, like a Mustang, on high speed track.
So I were going to build one the 351 would be the way I need to go. I really am not wanting to race my truck but I do want power on demand . I can't decide on the 351w or stay with the 302w. Also I want a deep rumble from exhaust.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 02:18 PM
  #8  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,007
Likes: 202
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

For a truck, I would definitely go with a 351, maybe stroking it to 408. However, I hear that the new Coyote 5 liter engine does amazing things in a truck, but may cost a lot to get. In either case, I'm sure you can find an exhaust system to give you the rumble you're looking for.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 07:46 PM
  #9  
pcmenten's Avatar
pcmenten
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 2
From: Boise, Idaho
Is a Clevor 302 worth the trouble? Your call. Might be interesting to put one in a Fox Mustang. If you could get some Aussie 302C heads to put onto a roller block, stroke it to 3.25", you'd have a peppy little runner. You'd have to notch the pistons to clear the intake valves.

I've heard that the 85 or 86 roller blocks had thick walls. If you could bore one of those to 4.1", you'd have an interesting 343" engine.

Edelbrock makes a 4bbl intake for the 302 Clevor. Summit sells it for $260.

The canted valves just flow better than the typical in-line Windsor valve. Low-lift flow is better. The valves are pretty big on Clevelands; 2.05" on the 2v heads. Valve sizes are restricted on Windsor heads, usually to about 2.02".

The open-chamber heads flow well and you can improve on that by using 30 degree valve angles instead of the usual 45 degree angles.

Just sayin'.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 09:19 PM
  #10  
Ken(Ark)'s Avatar
Ken(Ark)
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pcmenten
Is a Clevor 302 worth the trouble? Your call. Might be interesting to put one in a Fox Mustang.
I wish I had a dollar for every time I heard some young kid say he had a boss 302 in his mustang .

It would be a cool combo
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 09:33 PM
  #11  
pcmenten's Avatar
pcmenten
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 2
From: Boise, Idaho
Hi Ken. If I didn't already have unfinished projects, I would consider a Boss 302 build for my 86 Mustang GT. I'd like to find someone to weld up a EFI manifold for the Boss/Clevor combination. I think the GT40 intake has round ports up to the point where it bolts to the heads. Those round ports would mate up well to the round Cleveland ports.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 07:13 AM
  #12  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by pcmenten
Is a Clevor 302 worth the trouble? Your call. Might be interesting to put one in a Fox Mustang. If you could get some Aussie 302C heads to put onto a roller block, stroke it to 3.25", you'd have a peppy little runner. You'd have to notch the pistons to clear the intake valves.

I've heard that the 85 or 86 roller blocks had thick walls. If you could bore one of those to 4.1", you'd have an interesting 343" engine.

Edelbrock makes a 4bbl intake for the 302 Clevor. Summit sells it for $260.

The canted valves just flow better than the typical in-line Windsor valve. Low-lift flow is better. The valves are pretty big on Clevelands; 2.05" on the 2v heads. Valve sizes are restricted on Windsor heads, usually to about 2.02".

The open-chamber heads flow well and you can improve on that by using 30 degree valve angles instead of the usual 45 degree angles.

Just sayin'.
I've been thinkin on doing a 3.25" stroke Boss 302, there are off the shelf pistons for this, Probe makes em, but they're not cheap at $500 a set. I have a Hi-po main capped D8VE block that'll go .080 to use, I just haven't priced the custom pistons for that bore/stroke yet. And got a friend whose got a few sets of 4 bbl Cleveland heads he'll never use. I've yet to find a roller block that'll go that far, most are pretty much done at std bore.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 07:15 AM
  #13  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by pcmenten
Hi Ken. If I didn't already have unfinished projects, I would consider a Boss 302 build for my 86 Mustang GT. I'd like to find someone to weld up a EFI manifold for the Boss/Clevor combination. I think the GT40 intake has round ports up to the point where it bolts to the heads. Those round ports would mate up well to the round Cleveland ports.
You'd do better using a truck lower, the ports are far larger than the GT40 on the topside.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2012 | 12:11 AM
  #14  
BEWOLD's Avatar
BEWOLD
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: CANADA
I see its been awhile for this discussion but Trick flow makes a few manifolds for clevors, even a 5.0 style fuelie set up I think that would kick ***. CHI makes some wicked heads to build clevors as well. Jon Kasse has used them to win the engine masters a couple times. agreed new windsor heads exceed old clevelands, but you will still have to spend big bucks to get a modern windsor head that flows like a modern cleveland.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
Apr 13, 2004 12:08 AM
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Nov 12, 2002 01:38 AM
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Jan 14, 2002 09:06 AM
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
Mar 11, 2001 10:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 AM.