Notices

4bbl towing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2011 | 10:15 PM
  #1  
JustBlaze's Avatar
JustBlaze
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Upstate NY
4bbl towing

Hey guys,
I've come to see how you guys with 4 barrels on your 300s do towing.

It's coming to the point in my restobuild where I need to figure out my motor. I originally and still kind of do want a v8 but I've got the 300 that came in the truck and It's rebuild able.

My plan / details are:
Rebuild the 300 with a mild cam, offy dp, undecided 4bbl (thinking of a quadrajet for the hell of it). Little polishing and gasket matching on the head and of course efi exhaust manifolds.

The truck is gonna have a 4" lift with either 33's or 35's and 3:50 gears.
I know 3:50 gears aren't optimal for this but that's a future project when money is more available.

Transmission is a np435 btw.

--------

To cut this short with the details listed how will this do pulling a f150 trail rig on a trailer (6000lbs total?) around upstate ny (no giant mountains really on the highway).

I've towed 4500lbs trailer included with my 95 with 3.08s and 5 speed but didn't have any steep hills and it was almost bearable.


Sorry for the long post

Thanks
-Justin
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2011 | 09:06 AM
  #2  
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,978
Likes: 97
From: Boise, Idaho
Club FTE Gold Member
Sounds like you're on the right track. The only thing I've heard against your build is gasket matching. Seems that's not a desirable thing to do on the 300.

Other than that, do you know how to properly tune a quadrajet? From what I've heard, those are not easy to tune, unless you know them.


I'd also recommend looking into heating the underside of the intake.



Since you'll be removing the stock setup for the heat riser, you'll need to resupply heat to help with fuel atomization. It eliminates bogs and stumbles off the line.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2011 | 09:50 AM
  #3  
JustBlaze's Avatar
JustBlaze
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Upstate NY
Alright I'll avoid the gasket matching. I was thinking about the quadrajet because I've heard them mentioned as being good with mileage and power. I'll probably rebuild one of the holley's in the garage for temporarily once I find out their cfm but how does a 500cfm edelbrock that I've seen some people using do?

I know about heating the underside of the intake but I'm curious if the coolant actually goes through the intake? Is there a gasket between the adapter and the intake? and what does the otherside of that plate look like?

Thanks
-Justin
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2011 | 10:05 AM
  #4  
Harte3's Avatar
Harte3
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 10
From: Spokane, WA
All the QuadraJet Information I have found on the Internet

Qjet tuning is probably no more or less difficult than a Holley.

FORDSIX PERFORMANCE • View topic - Will it pull?

You might reconsider the use of the tall tires. They will be counterproductive to towing unless compensated for with short gears.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2011 | 11:34 AM
  #5  
nevrenufhp's Avatar
nevrenufhp
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,341
Likes: 5
From: Sacramento
I have 3.25's and stock 235 tires, and it does real well. I only got into the full 4bbl a couple times just to see what it would do. For all practical purposes, I didnt need 4bbl, just 2. I hauled about 2000 pounds in the bed, which is quite a chore when it's time to stop with 4 wheel manual drum brakes. It does seem a lot better at speed, vs the stock 300 setup. Stick with 33's with those gears. Overall impression of the add on goodies? it helps.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2011 | 07:51 PM
  #6  
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 6
From: Earth
The manifold has a cast-in space above the heat plate. Maybe 1/4" deep, there's not a lot of water circulation going on other than coolant passing through on the way to the heater core.

I've got 32" tires on my Bronco + 3.55:1 gears and it tows an 8,000lb trailer with no worries. Well, other than the usual Bronco squirrelliness and lack of braking.

Be sure to get the bottom end balanced piece-by-piece. To take advantage of a new cam and ported head she'll need to be able to stand on her tail.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2011 | 08:13 PM
  #7  
chrlsful's Avatar
chrlsful
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 12
From: Lawrence Swamp
peddle to the metal

Originally Posted by nevrenufhp
I have 3.25's and stock 235 tires, and it does real well. I only got into the full 4bbl a couple times just to see what it would do. For all practical purposes, I didnt need 4bbl, just 2. I hauled about 2000 pounds in the bed, which is quite a chore when it's time to stop with 4 wheel manual drum brakes. It does seem a lot better at speed, vs the stock 300 setup. Stick with 33's with those gears. Overall impression of the add on goodies? it helps.
The Big Valley

Sounds like quite a feat anywhere in Modesto (inc the hwy) less things have changed since '77 when I left there. They got a track now?
Have fun, B safe (contradiction?).
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2011 | 08:32 PM
  #8  
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,021
Likes: 4
From: Almost Heaven
Re-gear your truck for the tires or don't run big tires at all.
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2011 | 08:57 PM
  #9  
chrlsful's Avatar
chrlsful
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 12
From: Lawrence Swamp
HiYa Bill!
2X on what he said. Towing is about 'final drive ratio' - motor, transm, tire, no?
I have no theory, am not a mechanic - but heard the 1V is always more torquier (aint 4V for HP n revin the P*^s outta it?).
Understand the 300 to have a power band at 1500 to 2800 or so...
The more knowledgeable will enlighten -
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2011 | 09:10 PM
  #10  
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,021
Likes: 4
From: Almost Heaven
Hi Chad! Good to see you're active again. I thought you got snowed straight to the hot place or something.

Chad, normally you would be right but when it comes to something like this it really depends on the size of the carb and how it's tuned in.
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2011 | 09:20 PM
  #11  
chrlsful's Avatar
chrlsful
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 12
From: Lawrence Swamp
Originally Posted by 6CylBill
Hi Chad! Good to see you're active again. I thought you got snowed straight to the hot place or something.

Chad, normally you would be right but when it comes to something like this it really depends on the size of the carb and how it's tuned in.
Happy V Day, luv. Not sure I'm "active" but sure like the straight 6 site can't stay away too long. (in this crunchy granola, yuppie place V means the Vagina Monologues, capish?).

So if 1 had a HUGE 1V it would be the torquiest? Why would a 4V have "it"?
(sorry will read later, bedie bye X).

BTW: 'sno' n 'hot place' don't go 2 get her. 8^)
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2011 | 09:27 PM
  #12  
newrider3's Avatar
newrider3
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 625
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by AbandonedBronco
The only thing I've heard against your build is gasket matching. Seems that's not a desirable thing to do on the 300.
.
I'm still not quite sure where this notion comes from.
As lacking as the stock head is in the flow department, you should be wanting to do everything you can to improve the flow.
A full port and polish job will most definitely include matching the manifold ports to the head ports (or "gasket matching").
So why not at least port match while you have the manifolds off (I did) but aren't quite ready to tear down the head completely?
An eighth of an inch of port sticking up into the path of flow between your intake manifold and intake valve isn't going to help your power whatsoever (and this was consistent for each port when I did my swap).

Just my 2cents.


 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2011 | 09:27 PM
  #13  
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,150
Likes: 368
From: Near Los Angeles
Originally Posted by AbandonedBronco
Sounds like you're on the right track. The only thing I've heard against your build is gasket matching. Seems that's not a desirable thing to do on the 300.

Other than that, do you know how to properly tune a quadrajet? From what I've heard, those are not easy to tune, unless you know them.


I'd also recommend looking into heating the underside of the intake.



Since you'll be removing the stock setup for the heat riser, you'll need to resupply heat to help with fuel atomization. It eliminates bogs and stumbles off the line.
AB: You should PM the moderator and ask them to put that post in the 'T's & Tricks' sticky. Unless you'd like to post another thousand times.
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2011 | 09:32 PM
  #14  
chrlsful's Avatar
chrlsful
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 12
From: Lawrence Swamp
Different operational definitions of the same wrd (ie agreement)?
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2011 | 09:34 PM
  #15  
teds74ford's Avatar
teds74ford
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,701
Likes: 6
Well, I will shed light based on the 2 trucks with 300s I have had. First, I hated my 4bbl. The first truck had a modded engine with a cam, headers, offy C, and a 2150 with a motorcraft heated spacer. It pulled good, and I ran 4.10s with 36s. It seemed ok, but somewhat topped out on the highway.

My second truck is a stock crewcab with a stock 300. I feel that this engine is more driveable and has more low end torque. I also upgraded to 33s with the stock 3.55 gearing and really like this combo. With a granny 4 spd, towing is fine, but it still cruises down the interstate well.

In my experience, it is possible to OVERgear the 300. They don't like to rev. My vote is a 2bbl and 33s.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.