Is GM getting nervous?
#16
GM has no reason to be nervous unless they really think they have a shot at becoming the truck of choice. Seems to me that the level of stress is related to the goal that is set.
There will always be GM die hards as much as Ford and Dodge. Just like politics, any more than a 60% majority is unheard of. Human nature.
There will always be GM die hards as much as Ford and Dodge. Just like politics, any more than a 60% majority is unheard of. Human nature.
#17
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <wontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]>******** classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui>*********> <style> st2\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } </style> <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]-->
Just as there will always be those that buy the latest craze and those that will buy what’s suits them best at the time.
I jump into the third category.
I was a Class A line tech for a couple of Dodge dealers for a little over 18 years. Specialized in drive trains and electrical, but also did bumper to bumper. Working for Chrysler dealers came about from my start on cars, always had MOPAR's, thought I always would (my first 4 cars were MOPAR muscle cars).
The first new vehicle I bought when I left the dealers for my current career was a Tahoe.
I was happy to walk away from all my "loyalty" years.
When I went for my new truck in 2006, the Dodge's were ugly and rode like crap. The Ford's were noisy as could be and pricey compared to the GM. And then they had those engine-trans issues..............
So for 2006 it was a loaded GMC, quiet, fair price/value and I had minimal problems with it in the 75000 miles I drove it.
For 2010/11 model year – well I have been following the Scorpion since I first heard about it a few years ago, I really think Ford got it right this time, at least I hope so, ‘cause I got my VIN yesterday.
The Duramax - Allison is a great combo, and except for emission changes, has been the same proven drive train for 10 years.
The Ford is still more costly but now is even quieter then the Duramax, maybe too quiet. I think the Duramax has just the right amount of mechanical noise to let everyone know you don’t have spark plugs.
I’m looking forward to my first Ford “truck” (excluding my wife’s Lincoln). Hoping it lives up to all the hype and drags my 18K toy hauler around with its precious cargo, hopefully around the country in the next few years.
BTW – I worked at two multi franchise dealers when I was a tech, one 5 year stint even sharing the same shop.
The Ford techs were just as busy if not more so then the Dodge techs.
I’m ready – I’ve had my fun over the years poking at the Ram MOPAR – more ordered parts and recalls and the blue oval fix or repair daily etc.
So I’m ready for the lumps
I jump into the third category.
I was a Class A line tech for a couple of Dodge dealers for a little over 18 years. Specialized in drive trains and electrical, but also did bumper to bumper. Working for Chrysler dealers came about from my start on cars, always had MOPAR's, thought I always would (my first 4 cars were MOPAR muscle cars).
The first new vehicle I bought when I left the dealers for my current career was a Tahoe.
I was happy to walk away from all my "loyalty" years.
When I went for my new truck in 2006, the Dodge's were ugly and rode like crap. The Ford's were noisy as could be and pricey compared to the GM. And then they had those engine-trans issues..............
So for 2006 it was a loaded GMC, quiet, fair price/value and I had minimal problems with it in the 75000 miles I drove it.
For 2010/11 model year – well I have been following the Scorpion since I first heard about it a few years ago, I really think Ford got it right this time, at least I hope so, ‘cause I got my VIN yesterday.
The Duramax - Allison is a great combo, and except for emission changes, has been the same proven drive train for 10 years.
The Ford is still more costly but now is even quieter then the Duramax, maybe too quiet. I think the Duramax has just the right amount of mechanical noise to let everyone know you don’t have spark plugs.
I’m looking forward to my first Ford “truck” (excluding my wife’s Lincoln). Hoping it lives up to all the hype and drags my 18K toy hauler around with its precious cargo, hopefully around the country in the next few years.
BTW – I worked at two multi franchise dealers when I was a tech, one 5 year stint even sharing the same shop.
The Ford techs were just as busy if not more so then the Dodge techs.
I’m ready – I’ve had my fun over the years poking at the Ram MOPAR – more ordered parts and recalls and the blue oval fix or repair daily etc.
So I’m ready for the lumps
#19
#20
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Powder Springs, East TN
Posts: 7,241
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Its more like they are trying to appeal to teenagers then to the working class that buy there trucks. If they want to go with the longest lasting name? The only thing that stayed the same was the displacement 6.6L they have changed the engine several times. The 5.9L Cummins was the longest lasting motor size 89-07. Now the trannies have changed several times. Duramax is still the new kid on the block always will be the Powerstroke and Cummins motor have been around 10x. BTW I would like to see GMs new truck with the Duramax sitting under the drivers seat and the Allison up front :-p.
Gotta love the new slogan on the Chevy commericals " Chevy runs Deep" into debt, they must run there smear campaigns like there boss in the white house.
Gotta love the new slogan on the Chevy commericals " Chevy runs Deep" into debt, they must run there smear campaigns like there boss in the white house.
#21
guess that makes him the *itch in the relationship....anyone remember the ace and gary cartoons on saturday night live a few years back? al and max kinda remind me of them.
#22
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 6,127
Received 1,447 Likes
on
893 Posts
Its more like they are trying to appeal to teenagers then to the working class that buy there trucks. If they want to go with the longest lasting name? The only thing that stayed the same was the displacement 6.6L they have changed the engine several times. The 5.9L Cummins was the longest lasting motor size 89-07. Now the trannies have changed several times. Duramax is still the new kid on the block always will be the Powerstroke and Cummins motor have been around 10x. BTW I would like to see GMs new truck with the Duramax sitting under the drivers seat and the Allison up front :-p.
Gotta love the new slogan on the Chevy commericals " Chevy runs Deep" into debt, they must run there smear campaigns like there boss in the white house.
Gotta love the new slogan on the Chevy commericals " Chevy runs Deep" into debt, they must run there smear campaigns like there boss in the white house.
#23
#25
Just three hours ago while I was in a store my wife saw someone look at my 2011 F350 and call it the ugliest thing he's ever seen. Which is fine, I like the way it looks and that's all that matters to me.
I personally like the looks of the GM HD trucks. But Ford makes a better truck, and this is why I continue to buy Ford trucks.
#26
GMC/Chev has always been in the back seat. Remember the "Man Step" ad a few years back. GM pulled it when they realized that it was helping to sell more Fords than Chevys. I notice that there is a profusion of GM heavy duty pickup ads on the tube lately. It tickles me to hear them say " The most powerful we've ever made" instead of "in it's class". That distinction goes to Ford.
#27
Isn't the Scorpion the 4th Power Stroke in 10 years? Thats not really a fair comparsion.
Like it or not, the Duramx is a good combo, as is the CUmmins. But also in fairness, the Cummins is not a "light duty" diesel only. It came from the industrial world and used in everything from boats to garbage trucks to generators etc.
The Duramax BTW also was built around an industrial engine.
Like it or not, the Duramx is a good combo, as is the CUmmins. But also in fairness, the Cummins is not a "light duty" diesel only. It came from the industrial world and used in everything from boats to garbage trucks to generators etc.
The Duramax BTW also was built around an industrial engine.
#28
Isn't the Scorpion the 4th Power Stroke in 10 years? Thats not really a fair comparsion.
Like it or not, the Duramx is a good combo, as is the CUmmins. But also in fairness, the Cummins is not a "light duty" diesel only. It came from the industrial world and used in everything from boats to garbage trucks to generators etc.
The Duramax BTW also was built around an industrial engine.
Like it or not, the Duramx is a good combo, as is the CUmmins. But also in fairness, the Cummins is not a "light duty" diesel only. It came from the industrial world and used in everything from boats to garbage trucks to generators etc.
The Duramax BTW also was built around an industrial engine.
I honestly think this is the biggest reason the 6.7L has been such a huge success for Ford. Remember that IH designed previous powerstrokes to go in all of their trucks as well as a Ford pickup truck. This made them very difficult to service in a pickup truck chassis, as well as have lots of emissions related problems due to the engines not being designed to operate under light loading 90% of the time. These were bona fide medium duty engines adapted for light duty use, and that was proven to not be the best idea.
The 6.7L was designed from the ground up to go under the hood of a Ford pickup truck. This allowed them to design it to be serviceable in such a chassis as well as have better driveability due to not having to make compromises to satisfy the needs of medium duty trucks. This engine is designed to power a 7-9,000 lb truck that can see GCWRs of 33,000 lbs. NOT a 25,000 lb truck that can see GCWRs of 50-60,000 lbs as some T444e trucks were specced for.
This is, IMHO, an advantage for the FORD SCORPION engine.