check out this garbage
This article mainly targets Sam's club, which BTW is the only Sam's station in the whole state, period. This bill is also geared at the local Mom and Pop stores so that they have to sell at the same price as the Big owners, which will ultimately drive them out of the buisness!
http://rapidcityjournal.com/articles...cal/news02.txt
Anyone ever heard of a loss leader?
What the heck do you think it is when the local supermarket sells Soda for 2 bucks a 12 pack, or milk that is 50 cents off?
OOHH this really ticks me off!
Sorry for the rant.
I already think the local gov't is big enough, let alone to tell someone what they can and can't sell their gas at.
IMO, you almost have to be from the Rapid City area to understand what this bill is really intended for.
Before last summer, there was not a Sam's gas station in town. Becuase of this there was one prominate owner of gas stations in Rapid City and the surrounding areas, with the exception of one or 2 mom and pop shops. Now you also need to know that there is only one substation in this area that feeds ALL stations, i.e all the gas in the area comes from the same spicket (same cost to the retailer).
Before Sam's gas came to town, the one prominate owner would jack the gas prices every summer and especially during the Sturgis Bike rally, to prices almost approaching 1.80 for plain regular (Btw i'm not talking 5-10 staitons, im talking 30-40 through out the Black Hills area), while the rest of the state would be around 1.10-1.20 for regular.
When Sam's Club built thier lone gas station in the state (Rapid City) last summer, this lone prominate owner was forced to actually be some what competitive, and resulted in some what reasonable gas prices for the first time in a long time.
Oh yeah, one last thing 95% of the towns in this state have one one small gas station that the local area has to depend on, imagine driving 50-60 miles one way just to get your tank filled if this bill passes.
thanks for hearing my rants.
Last edited by superrangerman2002; Feb 27, 2003 at 08:09 AM.
I'm with you 110% on this one. What business is it of the government's what someone want's to sell their gas for? What's next? Bread? A government set standard price for all goods isn't that far away. There's a term for this approach COMMUNISM.
If Sam's want's to sell their gas at a loss, have at it. That's how the FREE MARKET SYSTEM that the USA and Canada are built on works. Bill and politicians like this boggle my mind.
The people have the power to put an end to this, and believe me, the squeaky wheel gets the grease. This business man and his money are no match for a majority of voting taxpayers. Try bandying about the term communist and see how quickly they backtrack.
Waxy
Theres nothing wrong with an occasional sale to drum up business, but when pricing is designed to destroy the local marketplace and ultimately create a monopoly, then theres a problem and governments should step in.
Last edited by tsheriff; Feb 27, 2003 at 12:29 PM.
Trending Topics
I agree with whoever said it, this is naked communism. There is no justification for that type of interference in private business, even if it is in the precious commodity market.
This is the kind of stuff that proves that individuals need to be constantly vigilant about what their government is doing, but even more diligent about digging to find the reasons for such actions.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Wal-mart has just opened one of thier monster-boxes nearby (complete with a manager named Clem) and they are selling trucked in milk at $1 below their cost. The fear is that they will put the local dairy out of business as well as the local dairy farmers.
Theres nothing wrong with an occasional sale to drum up business, but when pricing is designed to destroy the local marketplace and ultimately create a monopoly, then theres a problem and governments should step in.
Is milk the only thing you buy? Here's an idea, go to Walmart, get your milk (that they are puposely losing money on) then go acorss the street to your favourite mom and pop and buy everything else you need. Walmart will not continually lose money for no reason.
An even better idea, DON"T BUY YOUR MILK AT WALMART. Support your local dairy and ecourage others to do so.
Quite being fatalistic and take matters into your own hands. I have a lot of experience with this type of marketing. My cousin owns a small lumberyard and has recently had to learn to compete with the Home Depot that just opened. At first it hit him really hard, nut then he learned their game. Their strategy is simple, pick to or three major items and sell them at a loss, then raise the price of the rest of your stuff to cover that loss.
Example, Home Depot sells drywall for $2 less a sheet than my cousin can even buy it for from his suppliers, but they COUNT on you buying everything else you need at the same time, mud, tape, studs, maybe a trowel, etc, all of which is way more money than if you bought it at a local lumber yard. His solution was to drive his lumber truck over and buy his drywall from them and resell it at a profit, while advertising package prices on everything required at prices lower than Home Depot's total, and still profitable for him.
He would actually encourage people that called on a price for drywall to go and buy it at Home Depot and then come and see him for everything else they needed, and give them a good deal on it. He was not only making money, but hurting Home Depot while he was at it.
The other major irreplaceable factor is SERVICE. There is simply no replacement for it and no price you can put on it. You come to his lumberyard you get personal, knowledgeable service, good luck finding that at the Home Depot.
My point is the business man and the consumer rule, NOT the government. The last thing we need in Canada is MORE government.
Waxy
Or in marketing terms, that discounted milk, lumber, Basically any thing in a sales ad, is called a "Loss Leader", which is designed to bring customers in to buy other higher margin items.
Before last summer, there was not a Sam's gas station in town.
Oh yeah, one last thing 95% of the towns in this state have one one small gas station that the local area has to depend on, imagine driving 50-60 miles one way just to get your tank filled if this bill passes.
thanks for hearing my rants. [/B][/QUOTE]
First off, I am glad that the voted down the bill. I don't want the government into anymore than they are already, and they need out of a lot of that. Everybody talks about the oil companies price fixing, that's what that would have done except it would be State mandated. Oh yeah, just have to throw in that in S.D. there is at least 40 cents tax between state and federal fuel tax. I know it's at least 22 cents and 18 cents, maybe 22.5 and 18.5, don't remember for sure off hand. There have been more and more stations starting to post the tax at the pump so people now where the money is going. As to there only be one supply to the Blackhills, that is not accurate. There is a lot of fuel come in from across the State if it can be bought and hauled in cheaper, or some of it comes from Nebraska, North Platte I believe. This last summer they could not get diesel out of the terminal in Rapid City and had to haul it in from Nebraska, even though there was plenty of fuel in the tanks. The Air base has first pull on the pipeline and when they want fuel, they get it.
Also, who is the company who owns all the stations in the Black HIlls? Is it Big D or MG Oil or who? I do know these outfits have a lot of stations, but don't own all of them. They do deliever to a lot of the area stations though. There are still a lot of "mom & pop" type of stations around here. The way I understood that bill is that it was meant to help the small stations, but I'll admit I didn't read it, just the article, I will have to look into it when I get the time.
Now, as far as wal-mart and Sam's club goes, I don't like them at all. I do buy certain things there, only if I can't find them at a locally owned business first. I don't seem to have very good luck with Wal-mart merchandise, even if it is name brand it doesn't last like if I buy it somewhere else. I've also read an article about Wal-mart and their business practices that turned me off to them. The average annual salary for all their employees is under $20,000, that includes the managers and tellers and everybody averaged together. They don't hire but a minimum number of people for full time so they don't have to offer health insurance to the others. There are other things but don't want to rant anymore. Thank you for letting me express my thoughts.
Last edited by FordRancher; Mar 2, 2003 at 01:34 AM.





