51 f1
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
51 f1
I have an engine from a 1980 mercury zepher. I was told it was a 302 but the intake has a pan beneath it. I have a 289 intake that is solid.
The engine from the mercury has a pan you can see under the intake and angle plugs.
Is this still a 302
Thanks, Les Witt
The engine from the mercury has a pan you can see under the intake and angle plugs.
Is this still a 302
Thanks, Les Witt
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 4,818
From: Burbank, WA
Probably not. That sounds like the 255 engine Ford produced from 1980-82. It has a smaller bore and different heads and intake than the 302. A little short on horsepower, too. It's not desireable for use in a swap situation, if that's your intent.
Cargo Master
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,795
Likes: 129
From: Windermere Valley,B.C. Ca
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In 1980, a very urgent need to meet EPA CAFE standards led to the creation of the 255 cu in (4.2 L) version, essentially a 302 with the cylinder bores downcored to 3.68 in (93.5 mm). Rated power (SAE net) was 115-122 hp (86-91 kW), depending on year and application. Cylinder heads used smaller combustion chambers and smaller valves and the intake ports were ovals whereas the others were rectangular. The only externally visible cue was the use of an open runner intake manifold with a stamped steel lifter valley cover attached to its underside, giving the appearance of previous generation engines, such as the Y-Block and the MEL. It was optional in Fox chassis cars including the Mustang and corporate cousin Mercury Capri, Thunderbird, Fairmont, and standard equipment in the Ford LTD. Poorly received thanks to its dismal performance and mediocre fuel economy, it was dropped after the 1982 model year, and is considered one of the worst modern Ford engines.
Cargo Master
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,795
Likes: 129
From: Windermere Valley,B.C. Ca
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 4,818
From: Burbank, WA
Just because it's on wikipedia doesn't mean it's wrong. In this case, I'd say it's pretty darn accurate. ;-)
For the record, I didn't have to look it up. LOL
For the record, I didn't have to look it up. LOL
Trending Topics
I'll have the Roast Duck
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,622
Likes: 110
From: Northshore, MN
255 cid engines make great coffee table bases. And that's about all they're good for. The 200 I6 and 2.3 I4 were better engines as options in the Zephyr.
And I'm not talking about the Mercury flathead.
And I'm not talking about the Mercury flathead.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
3 Best / Worst Features Of The 2025+ Ford Expedition
Brett Foote
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition
Joe Kucinski
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now
Brett Foote
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals
Joe Kucinski
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership
Brett Foote
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches
Pouria Savadkouei
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained
Brett Foote
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post