When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It's going to take some effort to generate 13:1 static compression with a 302. I built a new Explorer 5.0L to put in my Falcon last spring and was surprised to find that it was a bit of a challenge to even get 9.5:1 out of it with flat top pistons and Eddy Performer RPM heads with 60cc combustion chambers. I had to use a .039" thick head gasket, mill the deck for 0 deck clearance, and search for pistons with the smallest valve reliefs I could find. The GT40 heads have bigger 64cc combustion chambers than what I was working with. You're looking at milling the heads to reduce combustion chamber size and domed or pop-up pistons at a minimum to get your compression up there. I ran a few quick scenarios through a compression calculator and it looks like you can get 13:1 by running zero deck clearance, a .030 overbore, milling the heads to 58cc, .039 head gaskets with a 4.100 gasket bore, and pistons with a 14cc dome. It certainly sounds like an interesting project and it can be done, but it's going to require some expense and a lot of homework. If you are building it from the ground up anyway, you might consider a stroker kit. The extra displacement will help generate compression and the cost is not going to be much more if any than rebuilding with a stock bottom end. As far as the cam goes, forget about any off-the-shelf cam. For that level of compression and E85, it will almost be mandatory to invest in a custom-ground camshaft.