1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Wiper Blades - 24" versus 20" - Go For The 24"!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #76  
Old 05-07-2011, 12:17 AM
straightaxle's Avatar
straightaxle
straightaxle is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is all about cost. If you figure that they saved $0.50 per truck, and sold 5million trucks, that is $2.5m dollars that they saved over the years. Meets minimum safety requirements, and saves money. That's how they stay in business.
 
  #77  
Old 05-07-2011, 01:47 AM
CPaulsen's Avatar
CPaulsen
CPaulsen is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used s Ford.....22" blades...WW-2230. Covered so much better then the ones it called for.
 
  #78  
Old 05-27-2011, 05:21 PM
fbh31118's Avatar
fbh31118
fbh31118 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 333
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Put on the 24" rain x blades and was pleased with the amount of glass it covered! Great upgrade... Thanks.
 
  #79  
Old 05-27-2011, 05:30 PM
Beachbumcook's Avatar
Beachbumcook
Beachbumcook is offline
Got Diesel?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,345
Received 20 Likes on 7 Posts
When it comes to wiper blades... "size does matter"... and 24" is longer and better than stock blades!!!
 
  #80  
Old 05-31-2011, 08:38 AM
jeff618's Avatar
jeff618
jeff618 is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

We will all have to agree to disagree on the wiper size issue. Part of engineering is definitely cost management but in reality, you're talking pennies difference between 20's and 22's or 24's not $.50.

At any rate, I think I hit gold with the Trico NeoForm beam blade upgrades. I continue to like them. Very quiet and wipe well. I looked - they come in all the sizes mentioned in this string...including the CORRECT SIZE - LOL!!
 
  #81  
Old 05-31-2011, 01:12 PM
GUNNERDOG's Avatar
GUNNERDOG
GUNNERDOG is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I installed 26" blades because they didn't have 24's in stock. They work great, good window contact and no lifting while driving at highway speeds in the rain. They just barely fit within the confines of the windshield. I'm sorry, but the stock wipers were a joke.
 
  #82  
Old 07-31-2013, 04:03 AM
greatbargins10's Avatar
greatbargins10
greatbargins10 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jeff618
I would argue that its not a coincidence. Do you really think that all the Ford Engineers put 20's on there for kicks and that they totally missed the fact that 24's would technically and physically fit? Do you think they didn't test this and for some reason just picked 20" for no reason? Again, do what you want, but I'm telling ya, if they though it was possible, they would have done it - its their frickin full time job!!

Aside from that, I just got an email from wipers123 that they're running rebates on the neoform wipers I use. It looks like a good deal on great wipers fyi.
explain then how the engineers missed the headbolt & oil cooler problems on the 6.0]
 
  #83  
Old 07-31-2013, 01:26 PM
xmontex4's Avatar
xmontex4
xmontex4 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tewksbury, MA
Posts: 4,654
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by GUNNERDOG
I installed 26" blades because they didn't have 24's in stock. They work great, good window contact and no lifting while driving at highway speeds in the rain. They just barely fit within the confines of the windshield. I'm sorry, but the stock wipers were a joke.
Holy crap! those must be huge! did you put them on both the driver and passenger side? I put 22" ones on in the spring...now i wanna go get some 26" ones and put these small ones on my 95 lol.
 
  #84  
Old 08-01-2013, 07:37 AM
I.B. Washincars's Avatar
I.B. Washincars
I.B. Washincars is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SW Indiana melon fields.
Posts: 930
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
No one thought of this?

I just read this whole thread (wasn't here when it was started) and can't believe you guys missed the totally obvious issue with these longer blades. Since they are at rest most of the time, they are catching 8" more air, causing more aero drag on the truck, affecting the fuel mileage . I thought you guys knew a little something about these trucks, now I'm not so sure . I'll bet you're feeling pretty silly about now.
 
  #85  
Old 08-01-2013, 07:44 AM
xmontex4's Avatar
xmontex4
xmontex4 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tewksbury, MA
Posts: 4,654
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by I.B. Washincars
I just read this whole thread (wasn't here when it was started) and can't believe you guys missed the totally obvious issue with these longer blades. Since they are at rest most of the time, they are catching 8" more air, causing more aero drag on the truck, affecting the fuel mileage . I thought you guys knew a little something about these trucks, now I'm not so sure . I'll bet you're feeling pretty silly about now.
What! That explains why i get such poor gas mileage...I was worried I was starting to think it may be the bigger tires and the lift!
 
  #86  
Old 08-01-2013, 07:50 AM
HeavyAssault's Avatar
HeavyAssault
HeavyAssault is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gulf Coast, FL
Posts: 3,204
Received 204 Likes on 110 Posts
Originally Posted by greatbargins10
explain then how the engineers missed the headbolt & oil cooler problems on the 6.0]
Oil cooler issues are related to the crappy Ford Gold coolant. Seeing as how International uses a different spec, one can understand COST issues of Ford running more than one type of coolant.

The head bolts do their job, they do it as designed. What you fail to realize is there are additional factors at play for HG issues. The deck flatness of the heads, the gaskets, and the workmanship when assembling the motor. Should any one of those fail to meet the standards the HGs will fail. There are even people reporting HG failures when using studs. Why?? Cause the heads were not checked properly or they were using poor quality gaskets.

BTW anything built by humans will eventually break down it's just the nature of things.
 
  #87  
Old 08-01-2013, 04:45 PM
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
A/Ox4 is offline
9 ECHO 1

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,450
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by I.B. Washincars
I just read this whole thread (wasn't here when it was started) and can't believe you guys missed the totally obvious issue with these longer blades. Since they are at rest most of the time, they are catching 8" more air, causing more aero drag on the truck, affecting the fuel mileage . I thought you guys knew a little something about these trucks, now I'm not so sure . I'll bet you're feeling pretty silly about now.
That's why I have summer and winter blades. 10 inchers for summer 26ers for winter. Change em out when I change my tires over to winter air. See the winter air is cooler there for more dense which makes for heavier tires.

Now everyone knows why you get worse mileage in the winter
 
  #88  
Old 08-02-2013, 01:49 AM
RBlac's Avatar
RBlac
RBlac is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by I.B. Washincars
I just read this whole thread (wasn't here when it was started) and can't believe you guys missed the totally obvious issue with these longer blades. Since they are at rest most of the time, they are catching 8" more air, causing more aero drag on the truck, affecting the fuel mileage . I thought you guys knew a little something about these trucks, now I'm not so sure . I'll bet you're feeling pretty silly about now.
I've got a lund visor... Not too worried about the extra 8 inches of wiper that will be exposed when I do this..

In all seriousness though there are folks who would subscribe to this thinking. They remove their mirrors and have these huge air dams etc.. All do gain .015 MPG.. just kidding but I'd never try any of it.
 
  #89  
Old 08-02-2013, 06:02 AM
redford's Avatar
redford
redford is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Stephensville WI
Posts: 23,106
Received 1,584 Likes on 923 Posts
Originally Posted by A/Ox4
That's why I have summer and winter blades. 10 inchers for summer 26ers for winter. Change em out when I change my tires over to winter air. See the winter air is cooler there for more dense which makes for heavier tires.

Now everyone knows why you get worse mileage in the winter
But the extra down force create by the larger wipers helps hold your truck on the road during those high speed runs. Otherwise, your truck would be trying to lift off of the ground once you hit somewhere around Mach 0.13874. It is well worth the extra drag.
 
  #90  
Old 08-02-2013, 11:01 AM
RBlac's Avatar
RBlac
RBlac is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Now that is funny right there. Next time I'm going to make a high speed run, I'll be sure to pick up some 26"s. Figure I can just take them off when not needing to keep all 4 wheels firmly on the ground.

 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BGLeRoy
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
20
04-09-2020 04:33 AM
AlaskanEx
Excursion - King of SUVs
61
04-14-2014 10:47 PM
7636074460
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
01-30-2013 01:37 AM
Pappys53
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
01-13-2012 01:43 PM
Big-Red-Lariat
Escape & Escape Hybrid
8
12-29-2010 09:01 AM



Quick Reply: Wiper Blades - 24" versus 20" - Go For The 24"!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.