Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

maf conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 10-17-2012, 12:09 PM
RIKIL's Avatar
RIKIL
RIKIL is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,379
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by stewart89
I have an afe box sitting around so I will make my own intake for it and make a new scoop for between the grill. I don't like how close the maf would sit the the box on the factory intake and want it a little farther down the line so there is no turbulance. Would this solve the problem your talking about?
Reducing the turbulence the sensor gets will always benefit, the sensor likes laminar air flow. But I don't think it would help the compensation issue with the tube. The sampling tube that will go around the sensor does a good guess of amount of air that needs to pass over the sensor so there will always be some variance with a system that is like a band aid. I am not really sure how close they are since I didn't have much luck with the sampling tube. Don't get me wrong, they work but after what I have learned over the last couple of years, I'd be willing to bet you'd get better performance with a tune vs. saving the money on a sampling tube.
 
  #17  
Old 10-17-2012, 12:10 PM
stewart89's Avatar
stewart89
stewart89 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did both tests with the pump disconected and got with-in 5 psi in all cylinders (176-181psi)
 
  #18  
Old 10-17-2012, 07:57 PM
stewart89's Avatar
stewart89
stewart89 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RIKIL
Reducing the turbulence the sensor gets will always benefit, the sensor likes laminar air flow. But I don't think it would help the compensation issue with the tube. The sampling tube that will go around the sensor does a good guess of amount of air that needs to pass over the sensor so there will always be some variance with a system that is like a band aid. I am not really sure how close they are since I didn't have much luck with the sampling tube. Don't get me wrong, they work but after what I have learned over the last couple of years, I'd be willing to bet you'd get better performance with a tune vs. saving the money on a sampling tube.
What would you suggest for a better replacement though. What did you do that worked?
 
  #19  
Old 10-17-2012, 09:09 PM
RIKIL's Avatar
RIKIL
RIKIL is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,379
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I got a tune - someone used a data logger (Tweecer-RT)I attached and tuned the computer & injector slopes which is similar to tuning a carbed vehicle. It's the best reading you can supply to the computer which results in better performance.
 
  #20  
Old 10-17-2012, 09:19 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,932
Likes: 0
Received 968 Likes on 765 Posts
Originally Posted by RIKIL
I got a tune - It's the best reading you can supply to the computer which results in better performance.
Gotta agree with that 100%. But.. it won't be necessary until you get the engine built up a fair bit.. like beyond the limits of the stock 19lb injectors. I haven't had my Tweecer on my truck since I got all the bugs ironed out partially because it's not necessary, its runs very well with a smooth idle and strong power with the stock Mustang EEC and matching MAF meter.. which is key of course, the computer is getting accurate info so it can accurately control the motor. I know if I swapped on the Cobra MAF meter I have I'd need to use the tuner, I used that meter before with the 5.8 and it didn't like it at all until it was tuned, but after that it ran like stock.
 
  #21  
Old 10-18-2012, 08:30 AM
stewart89's Avatar
stewart89
stewart89 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So when I order the kit it's best not to use the maf they provide and use a mustang one?
 
  #22  
Old 10-18-2012, 09:33 PM
stewart89's Avatar
stewart89
stewart89 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Final update. I got her running like a swiss watch tonight. Re-done some old wiring in various parts (lots of open bad wires and bad grounds) and re-set the timing to 10 deg. I can't believe how smooth it is now with absolutely zero hesitation,stubles, or shaking. Going to order the maf conversion hopefully next week.
 
  #23  
Old 10-20-2012, 12:14 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,932
Likes: 0
Received 968 Likes on 765 Posts
Originally Posted by stewart89
So when I order the kit it's best not to use the maf they provide and use a mustang one?
The computer hold the calibration info for the MAF meter so it's always best to use the meter that the computer is programmed for. Stock Mustang MAF meters are often found on Ebay and local used marketplaces, this is one of the first things ditched when guys start hotrodding their stangs. I wouldn't put much faith in a conversion kit that didn't include the correct MAF meter, I guess if the kit is reasonably priced it's OK but if not just buy or make a conversion wiring harness and buy a Mustang EEC and MAF meter seperately.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
garrettsr5
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
5
04-16-2013 08:56 PM
jr80coupe
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
19
06-02-2010 03:56 PM
ron01sd
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
1
02-02-2010 09:32 PM
big hoss 29
Montana Chapter
24
12-16-2005 02:28 AM
MustangGT221
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
17
06-08-2004 01:14 AM



Quick Reply: maf conversion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 PM.