6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

New 6.7PSD Upper Fuel Filter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-29-2023, 07:15 PM
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
FishOnOne is online now
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 6,334
Received 1,535 Likes on 950 Posts
New 6.7PSD Upper Fuel Filter

Looks like Ford added a bypass valve on the secondary fuel filter for improved cold conditions.

FD21-MC-ColdWeather-Diesel-Fuel-Filter-v5_a11y.pdf (powerstrokediesel.com)
 
The following users liked this post:
  #2  
Old 10-29-2023, 07:32 PM
Rich1961's Avatar
Rich1961
Rich1961 is online now
Tuned

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 388
Received 131 Likes on 81 Posts
Interesting. I started my truck without using the block heater a few times last winter (-12) without any problems. Most of the time I use a timer connected to the block heater for quicker warm ups. I wonder if the fuel starvation they mention has a negative effect on the CP4?
 
  #3  
Old 10-30-2023, 05:17 AM
speakerfritz's Avatar
speakerfritz
speakerfritz is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,053
Received 1,075 Likes on 828 Posts
So the injectors are going to take over the role of filtering particles below 10 microns….that can’t be good


a few months ago I added a filter in between the engine bay and tank filter…had an engine bay filter that was less then 3k miles crack…in seeing this…I’m glad I did.


ford solves one problem to create another

 
  #4  
Old 10-30-2023, 06:54 AM
rufushusky's Avatar
rufushusky
rufushusky is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Walpole, MA
Posts: 1,767
Received 432 Likes on 307 Posts
Originally Posted by Rich1961
Interesting. I started my truck without using the block heater a few times last winter (-12) without any problems. Most of the time I use a timer connected to the block heater for quicker warm ups. I wonder if the fuel starvation they mention has a negative effect on the CP4?
Yeah gelling can be a big problem for the CP4, especially on the unpinned buckets on the 2011-19, get that thing turned 90*s and the will be toast in short order.

Originally Posted by speakerfritz
So the injectors are going to take over the role of filtering particles below 10 microns….that can’t be good


a few months ago I added a filter in between the engine bay and tank filter…had an engine bay filter that was less then 3k miles crack…in seeing this…I’m glad I did.


ford solves one problem to create another
The OEM fuel system provides three times more fuel than required. My understanding is the bypass cuts down on the amount of fuel being returned to the tank and recirculates previously filtered fuel to the CP4. I could be wrong. I can't imagine Ford pushing 10 micron filter fuel to the CP4 and expecting sufficient wear rates.

BTW, where did you tap in for the addition fuel filter? I am thinking about scrapping the OEM set up and going the 1-14 threaded filter head route now that I am out of warranty.
 
  #5  
Old 10-30-2023, 08:23 AM
Painted Horse's Avatar
Painted Horse
Painted Horse is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kaysville Utah
Posts: 4,686
Received 2,635 Likes on 743 Posts
Originally Posted by Rich1961
Interesting. I started my truck without using the block heater a few times last winter (-12) without any problems. Most of the time I use a timer connected to the block heater for quicker warm ups. I wonder if the fuel starvation they mention has a negative effect on the CP4?
The block heater heats the coolant in the block, Allowing the engine to warm faster. It doesn't heat the oil in the oil pan and it doesn't heat the fuel in the tank.
The fuel gets heated as it passes thru the system on the engine and the excess fuel is returned to the tank. Slowly warming all the fuel
 
  #6  
Old 10-30-2023, 08:40 AM
speakerfritz's Avatar
speakerfritz
speakerfritz is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,053
Received 1,075 Likes on 828 Posts
Originally Posted by rufushusky
Yeah gelling can be a big problem for the CP4, especially on the unpinned buckets on the 2011-19, get that thing turned 90*s and the will be toast in short order.



The OEM fuel system provides three times more fuel than required. My understanding is the bypass cuts down on the amount of fuel being returned to the tank and recirculates previously filtered fuel to the CP4. I could be wrong. I can't imagine Ford pushing 10 micron filter fuel to the CP4 and expecting sufficient wear rates.

BTW, where did you tap in for the addition fuel filter? I am thinking about scrapping the OEM set up and going the 1-14 threaded filter head route now that I am out of warranty.

it would be good to see an animation of how the bypass valve works.

I installed something similar to this on the frame rail under the drivers side. I use the bolts that mount the transfer case bracket to hold it.

used some crimp clamps and got the correct fittings to extend the engine bay filter feed to my new filter, run a return from my new filter back up to the engine bay filter in. Later I plan to add a return line from my new filter to the tank return junction point.

my goal was to have an element that could filter between 4 and 10. My thought was that particles would accumulate in my new filter and prevent build up in the engine bay filter…preventing engine bay filter housing cracking.

if you add an in-between-filter, double check the micron ratings of the element…there is tricky math with the ratings …some use an 85% rating, some use an absolute number.



 
  #7  
Old 10-31-2023, 11:09 AM
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
FishOnOne is online now
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 6,334
Received 1,535 Likes on 950 Posts
Originally Posted by rufushusky
My understanding is the bypass cuts down on the amount of fuel being returned to the tank and recirculates previously filtered fuel to the CP4. I could be wrong. I can't imagine Ford pushing 10 micron filter fuel to the CP4 and expecting sufficient wear rates.
Looking a the small flow diagram it appears that the bypass is similar to a oil filter bypass and functions for the same reason.
 
  #8  
Old 11-01-2023, 07:20 AM
rufushusky's Avatar
rufushusky
rufushusky is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Walpole, MA
Posts: 1,767
Received 432 Likes on 307 Posts
Originally Posted by FishOnOne
Looking a the small flow diagram it appears that the bypass is similar to a oil filter bypass and functions for the same reason.
Barf....nothing like pushing 10 microns of crap through a 6 micron hole.
 
  #9  
Old 11-01-2023, 11:50 AM
speakerfritz's Avatar
speakerfritz
speakerfritz is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,053
Received 1,075 Likes on 828 Posts
Originally Posted by rufushusky
Barf....nothing like pushing 10 microns of crap through a 6 micron hole.

im going to put on my ford aluminum genius cap for a minute

so the thought must be….all fuel is pure so bypassing the 6micron filter is okay…AND…the reason for the bypass advertised as a winter good thing is that the fuel gel particles will melt as it approaches the CP4….so the metering valve screen and the injector screens won’t get clogged from fuel gel particles.


genius hat off

but I suspect clogged injector year round will increase….another ford money grab.


 
  #10  
Old 11-01-2023, 12:05 PM
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
FishOnOne is online now
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 6,334
Received 1,535 Likes on 950 Posts
Originally Posted by rufushusky
Barf....nothing like pushing 10 microns of crap through a 6 micron hole.
Yeah, but..... I would rather not starve the CP4.2 pump of fuel. It's kind of what's the less of two evils. Pretty sure Ford implemented due to CP4.2 failures from fuel starvation.
 
  #11  
Old 11-01-2023, 12:28 PM
JoeUser's Avatar
JoeUser
JoeUser is offline
Pusher of String

Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Dallas Metroplex
Posts: 876
Received 383 Likes on 265 Posts
Originally Posted by FishOnOne
Yeah, but..... I would rather not starve the CP4.2 pump of fuel. It's kind of what's the less of two evils. Pretty sure Ford implemented due to CP4.2 failures from fuel starvation.
I agree, when the filter gets clogged up with gelled fuel, then the bypass at least lets some fuel through. I can see the logic, as well. But, it's an issue only for those owners that operate in extreme cold, or temps that at least allow for fuel to gel.

I'm wondering if Ford will be replacing all former kits with this new one? I have no need for a bypass, as the temps don't get anywhere near as cold here in Texas. And, fuel additives can suffice for those temporary occasions where those kind of temps occur (which is very infrequently, here).
 
  #12  
Old 11-01-2023, 12:53 PM
rufushusky's Avatar
rufushusky
rufushusky is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Walpole, MA
Posts: 1,767
Received 432 Likes on 307 Posts
Originally Posted by FishOnOne
Yeah, but..... I would rather not starve the CP4.2 pump of fuel. It's kind of what's the less of two evils. Pretty sure Ford implemented due to CP4.2 failures from fuel starvation.
Yes I agree defiantly the lessor of two evils, still doesn't give you the warm and fuzzies.

Originally Posted by JoeUser
I agree, when the filter gets clogged up with gelled fuel, then the bypass at least lets some fuel through. I can see the logic, as well. But, it's an issue only for those owners that operate in extreme cold, or temps that at least allow for fuel to gel.

I'm wondering if Ford will be replacing all former kits with this new one? I have no need for a bypass, as the temps don't get anywhere near as cold here in Texas. And, fuel additives can suffice for those temporary occasions where those kind of temps occur (which is very infrequently, here).
I would assume this is across the board, I haven't see a new part number or amended part number issued. Dualling specs for a single part number is atypical. But I could always be wrong.
 
  #13  
Old 11-01-2023, 04:49 PM
Overkill2's Avatar
Overkill2
Overkill2 is online now
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Western NY
Posts: 25,603
Received 6,757 Likes on 4,920 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeUser
I agree, when the filter gets clogged up with gelled fuel, then the bypass at least lets some fuel through. I can see the logic, as well. But, it's an issue only for those owners that operate in extreme cold, or temps that at least allow for fuel to gel.

I'm wondering if Ford will be replacing all former kits with this new one? I have no need for a bypass, as the temps don't get anywhere near as cold here in Texas. And, fuel additives can suffice for those temporary occasions where those kind of temps occur (which is very infrequently, here).
I have to imagine that the bypass works on pressure that if the filter plugs up with gelled fuel, then the bypass when it senses that and opens to allow unfiltered fuel to flow... Preventing starvation of the CP4 in frigid weather.

You warm weather folks have No worries because you normally don't have the colder temps to gel up the fuel. So it won't affect your filtration of fuel... Honestly, I'd rather have the bypass set up and working than to starve that Bosch pump. But I use the double dose (winter dose of 500 :1) of K100 so I'm not too worried as I haven't had gelled fuel since I've bought my truck... But that's just me and my 2 cents...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Qwazert
6.2L V8
0
04-27-2020 04:13 PM
61 uni
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
1
11-22-2008 08:20 AM
Jacksfirstdiesel
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
1
02-22-2007 07:36 PM



Quick Reply: New 6.7PSD Upper Fuel Filter



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 PM.