Notices
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

Fuel Additive pro/con

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 08:31 AM
  #1  
djjoshuad's Avatar
djjoshuad
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 1
From: Corinth, TX
Fuel Additive pro/con

I've been noticing lately that my MPG depends greatly on where I buy fuel. None of the local truck stops or convenience store pumps have ratings posted, they just all say "ULSD". It seems that the local Allsup's has the best I've used so far (a not-so-local TA truck stop has been great too), and the local QuickTrip has the worst. I'm going *purely* based off of MPG per tank.

A week from today I'm heading out on a trip halfway across the US and back. I will fill up at mostly random truck stops along the way. I have no reliable way to know which ones are good or bad... so I'm looking to hedge my bets.

As far as diesel fuel additives go, what are the pros and cons of each? This being my first diesel, I don't have years of additive-buying experience to lean on like many of you do. My goals are mainly to improve MPG through increased lubricity and/or cetane rating. I would like to pick up several bottles of the same stuff to take with me, treating each tank of fuel in an attempt to "smooth out the curve" of bad to good fuel stops.

Any and all advice will be appreciated
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 11:14 AM
  #2  
kper05's Avatar
kper05
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,600
Likes: 83
Club FTE Silver Member

The maintenance, tips, etc. document says to use PM-22-A (U.S.) motorcraft cetane booster if needed.

I found a post about cetane rating by fuel provider in the 6.4L section last night.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/9...ml#post9335294

My main point I wanted to bring up was to keep at least one spare fuel filter kit (two filter units replaced at the same time) with your truck.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 11:44 AM
  #3  
wiedsworld's Avatar
wiedsworld
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: SW Ohio
Originally Posted by kper05
The maintenance, tips, etc. document says to use PM-22-A (U.S.) motorcraft cetane booster if needed.

I found a post about cetane rating by fuel provider in the 6.4L section last night.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/9...ml#post9335294

My main point I wanted to bring up was to keep at least one spare fuel filter kit (two filter units replaced at the same time) with your truck.
Did EpicCowlick ever do the video for the filter change procedure?
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 12:16 PM
  #4  
djjoshuad's Avatar
djjoshuad
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 1
From: Corinth, TX
should I really plan to swap filters before 5k miles? If so, what are the telltale signs of needing to replace filters?

BTW, given that other post, I think I'm going to start using Chevron for diesel. Try to stay consistent there for a few tanks, see how it does.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 03:15 PM
  #5  
summet20's Avatar
summet20
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: The Thumb, MI
I think I'm going without it for the winter months and see how the truck does. If the fuel starts gelling up then I will start using it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 05:42 PM
  #6  
Painted Horse's Avatar
Painted Horse
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,219
Likes: 4,223
From: Kaysville Utah
Try this link for an interesting read on diesel additives.
Lubricity Additive Study Results - Diesel Place
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 03:42 AM
  #7  
cford716's Avatar
cford716
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by summet20
I think I'm going without it for the winter months and see how the truck does. If the fuel starts gelling up then I will start using it.
If I am not mistaken don't the gas stations start getting a winter mix with anti-gelling additive added as we go into the colder months? Depending on your region.
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 04:41 AM
  #8  
Rafiki2cu's Avatar
Rafiki2cu
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Painted Horse
Try this link for an interesting read on diesel additives.
Lubricity Additive Study Results - Diesel Place
Interesting info. Is anyone using the Opti-Lube XPD. After reading the the results it would seem to be a good product to use.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 12:12 AM
  #9  
Painted Horse's Avatar
Painted Horse
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,219
Likes: 4,223
From: Kaysville Utah
I bought and used it sporadically in my 2006 6.0L. I'd usually put some in the tank when I knew I would be working the truck hard.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 08:39 PM
  #10  
jermort's Avatar
jermort
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 340
Likes: 2
From: Colorado foot hills
I like diesel kleen (available at wally-world).

Heck, even the 2011 owners manual suggests a cetane booster when needed.

I used it pretty regliously in my 2000 and had 194k on the clock when I swaped for the '10 KR. Still had the stock injectors in 'er.

jammer
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 08:52 PM
  #11  
gearloose1's Avatar
gearloose1
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by aquaman
I came across this post in a VW TDI forum.

http://forums.tdiclub.com/showpost.p...74&postcount=1



***Cetane levels by fuel company. To ensure accuracy if you have a level to add to the list please forward an email from a corporate office to me, and I will add it to the list. Please bear in mind that the current minimum from refiners in North America is 40. Depending on the quality of the oil used as well as refining processes you'll find 40-42 from refiners in the US and Canada. Anything above that has to do with specific companies additive packages. When companies give a minimum value then it will be listed as a single number. When a company gives a range of numbers bear in mind that more often than not you'll probably find the lower number rather than the higher number. If 40 is listed then it generally means that fuel is bought as is from the refiner--if someone messes up and doesn't put in enough additive at the refinery then that can cause major problems for your fuel system. It's recommended therefore that if you get the inexpensive fuel with low cetane you use a cetane booster (PowerService, Redline 85+ or Stanadyne are all great choices), or run a little biodiesel in the tank. If something higher than 42 is listed then the retailer adds their own additive package in addition to the standard refinery additive package. Generally speaking as long as 49 or higher is listed you do not need to worry about adding any additives yourself.

BP (Amoco branded), 51;
Chevron, 49;
PetroCanada, 47-51
Marathon, 45-47
BP (Powerblend 47, otherwise 40-42)
Shell, 46;
Sinclair, 46;
Sunoco Gold, 45 (often +1-5) Sunoco regular is usually 40.
Holiday Stations, 40-43
HESS, 40-42, can be up to 45.
Husky, 40 + diesel Max additives raise another 1-3 from there (41-45 max)
Love's: 40
Pilot: 40
Valero: 40
Flying J, 40



You have uncovered one of the biggest dirty secrets of the diesel fuel business.

Fuel quality varies widely even within name brands.

That is before adulteration.

As for bio-diesel? The joke is on you as there is virtually nil quality control and auditing and spot checks.


I strongly advise anyone that will listen to never use bio-diesel or at least, avoid it as long as possible, and only get biodiesel blends of the lowest content, most reputable, highest reliability source.

Do not risk biodiesel for cetane boost --- it is not worth it.

Buy a bottle of cetane boost instead.


Any cetane below 45 is going to seriously compromise performance.

In Europe, cetane levels are around 52, and their vehicles gag a the stuff sold here as "diesel"

When there is such a drastic difference in actual mileage, it is telling you something.

Oh BTW --- low cetane equal high particulates production.

High particulates = more likely to clog EGR, more DPF regens, etc.

Cetane boost any suspect fuel... is my thinking.


FYI, I posted recently on the whole issue of fuel adulteration / quality, and ended up being harangued because people did not want to believe that there is widespread cheating, adulteration, and scamming going on in the diesel business.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 10:32 AM
  #12  
djjoshuad's Avatar
djjoshuad
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 1
From: Corinth, TX
actually, higher than normal cetane ratings will *increase* particulate because they smoke more. There is a really good read here: http://www.chevron.com/products/prod...ech_Review.pdf that explains WAY more than I ever wanted to know about diesel fuel

the specific excerpt I'm referencing is on page 9 of that PDF:

Variation of most fuel properties within the normal ranges will not lead to the high level of particulate matter (PM) represented by smoking. The exception is cetane number; fuel with a very high cetane number can cause smoking in some engines. The short ignition delay causes most of the fuel to be burned in the diffusion-controlled phase of combustion (see page 78), which can lead to higher PM emissions.
so while higher cetane ratings do appear to be a good thing, it's much like octane for gas in that the engine must be properly timed for it. I guesstimate that a cetane rating of 50 is probably a good safe target for our engines. Perhaps someone with more knowledge can improve on that guess.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 11:07 AM
  #13  
gearloose1's Avatar
gearloose1
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by djjoshuad
actually, higher than normal cetane ratings will *increase* particulate because they smoke more. There is a really good read here: http://www.chevron.com/products/prod...ech_Review.pdf that explains WAY more than I ever wanted to know about diesel fuel

the specific excerpt I'm referencing is on page 9 of that PDF:



so while higher cetane ratings do appear to be a good thing, it's much like octane for gas in that the engine must be properly timed for it. I guesstimate that a cetane rating of 50 is probably a good safe target for our engines. Perhaps someone with more knowledge can improve on that guess.

Right on --- there is an "optimum" cetane.

Someone need to chime in here with knowledge of Diesel Engine Electronics.

On a gasser, variances in octane is addressed by retarding the timing in accordance with the anti-knock sensor detecting knocking.

Can someone tell is whether there is a good way to sense cetane and whether it is theoretically (whether or not actually) possible to adjust injection timing?

As I understand it, most diesel engines here are optimized for about 45 cetane, and lose performance when it is below that.

A severe "out of range" cetane, e.g. over 60, would cause the problems mentioned above.

Do anyone here know if the current generations of engines can adjust / adapt to different cetane levels via the electronics and software?

ie 6.0 6.4 and 6.7?

I am pretty sure the 6.0 can't.


Visualize the combustion process.

If you have low cetane, it means the fuel starts combusting too soon -- before the fuel droplets are properly mixed with the compressed charge.

On the other hand, excess cetane mean that combustion is delayed too long.

Neither is good.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 11:18 AM
  #14  
djjoshuad's Avatar
djjoshuad
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 1
From: Corinth, TX
I would think that if any of those can do it, it would be the 6.7... but I honestly don't know. It seems reasonable to me that *some* sort of automatic injection timing adjustment exists... but how would it be sensed? It doesn't cause knocking like octane changes do in gas. Hopefully someone can answer that question.

Where are you getting the number 45 from? I'm not questioning it, I'd just like to read the reference as well. I specifically switched to chevron because they claim 47 cetane rating in publications... and so far on this tank I've noticed a slight bump in mpg... but nothing to write home about. maybe 1mpg more and that might just be my driving (or any number of factors). I'd think that if 45 is the target, 47 should be fine. 50 or 52 might cause more particulate and actually *lower* mpg overall because of the more frequent regen cycles.

Man, I knew moving to diesel would be drastically different... but never expected this
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 11:24 AM
  #15  
gearloose1's Avatar
gearloose1
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by djjoshuad
Where are you getting the number 45 from? I'm not questioning it, I'd just like to read the reference as well. I specifically switched to chevron because they claim 47 cetane rating in publications... and so far on this tank I've noticed a slight bump in mpg... but nothing to write home about. maybe 1mpg more and that might just be my driving (or any number of factors). I'd think that if 45 is the target, 47 should be fine. 50 or 52 might cause more particulate and actually *lower* mpg overall because of the more frequent regen cycles.





Typically engines are designed to use fuels with Cetane Numbers of 40-55, because below 38 a more rapid increase in ignition delay. The significance of the cetane number increases with the speed of the engine, and large, low speed diesel engines often only specify viscosity, combustion and contaminant levels, as Cetane Number requirement of the engine is met by most distillate and residual fuels that have the appropriate propeties. High speed diesel engines ( as in cars and trucks ) virtually all are designed to accept fuels around 50 Cetane Numbers, with higher numbers being a waste. </pre>
Cetane number (Bruce Hamilton)




Diesel Fuel News
EMA WANTS 43-CETANE N. AMERICA ULSD.(Engine Manufacturers Association)(Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel Fuel)

Article from: Diesel Fuel News | September 12, 2005 | Copyright Hart Energy Publishing, LP Jun 9, 2008 (Hide copyright information) Copyright

Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA) unveiled a "North American Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel Fuel Properties" recommendation calling for a 43-cetane number minimum rather than today's 40-cetane minimum. EMA's statement not only confirms support for a 15-ppm sulfur maximum ULSD that U.S. EPA specifies, but also asks American Society for Testing & Materials (ASTM) to boost the minimum cetane number to 43, from the current 40, via ASTM D613 method (http://www.enginemanufacturers.org/a...upload/192.pdf). The cetane boost "will improve the sociability aspects of diesel fuel performance such as white smoke, engine starting and engine combustion noise," EMA said. EMA also
EMA WANTS 43-CETANE N. AMERICA ULSD.(Engine Manufacturers Association)(Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel Fuel) | HighBeam Business: Arrive Prepared



I know mine 2005 (6.0) is optimized for 45ish --- because that is the target cetane that manufacturers were moving refiners to for 2004/2005

Note the EMA wanted a minimum of 44, but a target of around 45 and up.


You, having a later model year (2011) , is probably optimized higher. Perhaps as high as 50?

As to whether there is compensation for higher and lower than expected optimal cetane... we need some engineers to chime in.


Off hand, I can think of a way to do it via combustion gas temperature measured instantly at the exhaust valve, or perhaps via a highly sensitive "knock" MEMS sensor that detects how the actual combustion phase (initial vs final) is done.

Whether this is actually done --- is another question.

regeneration frequency (a measure of particulates) can give a longer (not real time) sense of it... as both gross under and gross over will have consequences that is detectable in the tailpipe.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE