Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

57-60 frame alignment specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 06:45 PM
  #1  
transam525's Avatar
transam525
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 356
Likes: 14
From: California
57-60 frame alignment specs

I'm picking my 1960 F-100 frame up from acid dipping this Saturday and taking it to a frame shop for some alignment work. One of the front rear leaf spring mounts needs to be pulled forward back into alignment. While the frame is there, I would like to have all specs checked before sending to powder coat. Does anyone know where I can find the frame/collision alignment specs to provide to the shop?
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 07:18 PM
  #2  
AXracer's Avatar
AXracer
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,882
Likes: 88
From: Durham NC
AFAIK the only "alignment specs" for these ladder frames is they need to be square and not twisted, front and rear suspension needs to be perpendicular to frame centerline.
You had the frame acid dipped??? Acid dipping was once a popular way to lighten a drag racing vehicle by thinning the metal a small amount, but would have no reason for being done on a street chassis. Perhaps you had some sort of chemical cleaning or rust removal done, but acid dipping would be a misnomer for those type processes. I only bring this up to keep someone reading this from actually acid dipping their chassis.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 08:16 PM
  #3  
ibuzzard's Avatar
ibuzzard
See A Man About A Horse
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,859
Likes: 623
From: Mariposa, Ca.
Club FTE Gold Member
In the Group 7 (wheels,tires,chassis,suspension,and frames) Section,
under specs,the only thing I see listed is the width - 34",front and rear - and the center to center measurements for the spring hangers.Front spring hangers - 44 5/32",rear spring hangers - 51 21/32".These are taken from my 1959 shop manual,should be the same as the 60? I have,but cannot find right now,a more detailed specification booklet that could possibly have additional measurements,if i find it,I'll forward any pertinent info.Or,you could try contacting mr4speedford,who is sure to have that same booklet,and will help you out.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 11:28 PM
  #4  
transam525's Avatar
transam525
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 356
Likes: 14
From: California
The frame is being chemically stripped in a tank. I'm not sure of the chemicals being used, but it is some sort acid-based chemical, followed by a neutralizing solution (submersion). Being as we are in California, which is very strict on harsh chemicals, it's probably not the same solution used back in the 70's. The main reason I went with the acid dip was to remove any grease and rust from in between the riveted sections of the frame and clean areas where media blasting can't reach. This will ensure any rust in these areas is permanently removed and will not continue once the powder coat is applied. Additionally, the frame will be media blasted before powder coat to remove any flash rust and provide a stronger bonding surface for the powder coat to bond. All this should provide a long-lasting finish which is more durable than traditional paint and last longer for future family generations to enjoy.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 11:46 PM
  #5  
TomPorter's Avatar
TomPorter
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
It appears that you are doing a 'restoration' rather than a 'rodstoration'. Would that be correct?
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 07:34 PM
  #6  
transam525's Avatar
transam525
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 356
Likes: 14
From: California
Correct. The restoration will be to concourse level, using mostly NOS parts. Even though a powder coated frame will not be 100% correct, the finish will look like the original (but much more durable) and is accepted by most judges. Although I never plan to have the truck judged, I want it to look 100% original, using as many original Ford parts as I can obtain.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 07:36 PM
  #7  
transam525's Avatar
transam525
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 356
Likes: 14
From: California
The frame dimensions should be the same. All I have are the same specs as you, from my 1960 factory repair manual. Definitely let me know if you find the additional specs.

Originally Posted by ibuzzard
In the Group 7 (wheels,tires,chassis,suspension,and frames) Section,
under specs,the only thing I see listed is the width - 34",front and rear - and the center to center measurements for the spring hangers.Front spring hangers - 44 5/32",rear spring hangers - 51 21/32".These are taken from my 1959 shop manual,should be the same as the 60? I have,but cannot find right now,a more detailed specification booklet that could possibly have additional measurements,if i find it,I'll forward any pertinent info.Or,you could try contacting mr4speedford,who is sure to have that same booklet,and will help you out.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gene Horr
Excursion - King of SUVs
25
Oct 3, 2014 12:41 PM
stirfrysteve
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
4
Sep 11, 2011 08:31 PM
tipsytiger
2004 - 2008 F150
4
Apr 25, 2004 01:00 AM
gensis1000
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
May 28, 2000 12:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM.