Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

1995 302-351 swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2020 | 01:26 PM
  #31  
94whiteford's Avatar
94whiteford
8th Gear
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
1994 f150 351 swap

So need some help. I have a 1994 f150 with a 302 with the 4R70W U type tranny in it and I’m planning on swapping motors, I have a 351 engine that I wanna drop in and have been reading some forums on this swap but i can’t find 100% answers. Wondering if i can use the same tranny, computer and driveshaft or if they need to be replaced. Everywhere i have read has said both yes and no. Any help would be great. What flexplate, distributor and things like that I would need. Making it carb. Thanks
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2020 | 03:25 PM
  #32  
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,761
Likes: 1,734
From: Kentucky
Originally Posted by 94whiteford
So need some help.
Start your own thread instead of tacking onto a stale one.

Originally Posted by 94whiteford
I have a 1994 f150 with a 302 with the 4R70W U type tranny in it and I’m planning on swapping motors, I have a 351 engine that I wanna drop in and have been reading some forums on this swap but i can’t find 100% answers. Wondering if i can use the same tranny, computer and driveshaft or if they need to be replaced. Everywhere i have read has said both yes and no.
The correct answer is you can use the existing pieces already in the truck.


Originally Posted by 94whiteford
Any help would be great. What flexplate, distributor and things like that I would need.
You need a flexplate for a 5.8L engine with an AOD transmission. Crown Vic's have this combination.


Originally Posted by 94whiteford
Making it carb. Thanks
Why make this swap that much harder for very little to no gain other than a thinner wallet?
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2020 | 04:27 PM
  #33  
My4Fordtrucks's Avatar
My4Fordtrucks
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 12,586
Likes: 2,361
Originally Posted by 94whiteford
So need some help. I have a 1994 f150 with a 302 with the 4R70W U type tranny in it and I’m planning on swapping motors, I have a 351 engine that I wanna drop in and have been reading some forums on this swap but i can’t find 100% answers. Wondering if i can use the same tranny, computer and driveshaft or if they need to be replaced. Everywhere i have read has said both yes and no. Any help would be great. What flexplate, distributor and things like that I would need. Making it carb.
Couple of questions for you. Why do you want to downgrade to a carburetor and the other is how do you plan on controlling that electronically controlled transmission?
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2020 | 07:38 PM
  #34  
David Heady's Avatar
David Heady
New User
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
95 302-351w

My 95 is a 5.0 manual with map and I'm wanting to swap a 95 351w into it is this still as straight forward. Debating on whether or not I want to swap my 5.0 out or just put a different one into it
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2020 | 10:37 PM
  #35  
Mudsport96's Avatar
Mudsport96
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 572
From: Chillicothe
Originally Posted by David Heady
My 95 is a 5.0 manual with map and I'm wanting to swap a 95 351w into it is this still as straight forward. Debating on whether or not I want to swap my 5.0 out or just put a different one into it
you can do a 351, but you need to find a 351 5 speed computer to run it. Look for f250s and 350s of the same year. You will also need all the 351 fuel injection manifold and fuel rails
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2020 | 10:49 PM
  #36  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,927
Likes: 1,494
From: Ottawa, Ontario
This is still a good swap, a 5.8 is almost a direct bolt in and it is a much better truck motor. No wiring changes are necessary and it is advised to not use ANY wiring that comes with the donor motor, strip all wiring from the donor and connect the 5.0 engine harness directly to the sensors and actuators on the 5.8. A different flywheel is needed and the exhaust system will need a small modification to fit the wider 5.8. The 5.0 computer will run a 5.8 but probably not to it's full potential, the two motors use all the same sensors, same injectors and heads so fueling requirements aren't a lot different.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2020 | 12:32 AM
  #37  
Mudsport96's Avatar
Mudsport96
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 572
From: Chillicothe
Originally Posted by Conanski
This is still a good swap, a 5.8 is almost a direct bolt in and it is a much better truck motor. No wiring changes are necessary and it is advised to not use ANY wiring that comes with the donor motor, strip all wiring from the donor and connect the 5.0 engine harness directly to the sensors and actuators on the 5.8. A different flywheel is needed and the exhaust system will need a small modification to fit the wider 5.8. The 5.0 computer will run a 5.8 but probably not to it's full potential, the two motors use all the same sensors, same injectors and heads so fueling requirements aren't a lot different.
Ive always been under the impression a 5.0 SD computer wouldn't run a 5.8?
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2020 | 09:47 AM
  #38  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,927
Likes: 1,494
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by Mudsport96
Ive always been under the impression a 5.0 SD computer wouldn't run a 5.8?
Yes the motor will fire up and run, why wouldn't it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2020 | 10:30 AM
  #39  
David Heady's Avatar
David Heady
New User
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Mudsport96
you can do a 351, but you need to find a 351 5 speed computer to run it. Look for f250s and 350s of the same year. You will also need all the 351 fuel injection manifold and fuel rails
I'm planning on just buying the complete engine so it will come with the fuel injection stuff and fuel rails will probably try to get him to throw the manifold in also 🤞🏼 as far as flywheel goes will have to do anything with that aspect or my starter? was told my flywheel and starter wouldn't work with the 351
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2020 | 11:48 AM
  #40  
Mudsport96's Avatar
Mudsport96
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 572
From: Chillicothe
Well yeah, but as for driving i didnt know if a SD system would adjust for the 14% extra displacement. I figured maf could do it easy since it reads the airflow into the engine.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2020 | 04:12 PM
  #41  
wwhite's Avatar
wwhite
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 824
I'm not sure, but more than likely the SD will be fine. A tuner would be better, or EEC for the correct displacement of engine.

I took a plain stock 351w and put a lightning tune in it, same displacement, but obviously fuel, spark, injector tables completely different. Truck would randomly backfire. I ended up putting stock tune back in.

Sure it'll run, but not optimally, and any other mods should have a tune done.

 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2020 | 09:14 PM
  #42  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,927
Likes: 1,494
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Yes MAF does it for sure, but even SD has some room to work. So yes, 14% greater displacement which will require a little more fuel but that is well within what the injectors can supply(25% more), I don't recall the exact number but I think there is + - 15% adjustment range available in the fuel maps and in closed loop the computer will see a lean condition at the O2 and make adjustments. In open loop there is no feedback so there is potential for problems there but the open loop fuel map is richer than closed loop to begin with so maybe not that bad. For heavy duty use the correct PCM would be advised obviously, but it's not absolutely necessary to make it start up and drive around.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sweet bronco love
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
5
Aug 24, 2011 12:04 PM
ToughestTruckBuilt
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
0
Aug 4, 2011 10:55 PM
arch-nemesis
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
1
Sep 22, 2004 10:34 AM
seans64'
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
3
Nov 16, 2003 06:15 PM
toughf1
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
May 29, 2001 02:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.