Notices

What and where engine identification

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 07:42 PM
  #16  
rsargent's Avatar
rsargent
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Jasper
Yeah. Once I verify that the bearing clearances are ok and check the cylinder bores, valves, etc. I'm hoping this engine is in good enough shape to not need a rebuild. I plan on doing a frame off on the '70 next spring and I'm hoping this is going to be my engine. Not looking for a hot rod, just nice looking, functional and reliable. Stock is fine as long it's solid. I'm on a low budget.
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 07:50 PM
  #17  
bojo68's Avatar
bojo68
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
There's nothing special inre to 6015.

6015 is nothing more than the bare block casting basic number, regardless of the engine size. Ford has used 6015 since 1908.

The Ford basic part number for every bare block is 6010, and has been since 1908.

Casting numbers cannot be cross referenced to actual FoMoCo part numbers. And...usually the casting/part basic numbers are different.
ok, interesting, thank you...
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2010 | 05:33 PM
  #18  
chango's Avatar
chango
New User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
i bought a 1963 f100. casting number on block is c9oe-6015-c. what does c on end mean. is this a cleveland or windsor. and will this block properly use other small block parts. my cast numbers are different on intakes and exhaust.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 01:37 AM
  #19  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by chango
i bought a 1963 f100. casting number on block is c9oe-6015-c. what does c on end mean. is this a cleveland or windsor. and will this block properly use other small block parts. my cast numbers are different on intakes and exhaust.
The C suffix is a design change.

A 1963 truck would not have a C9OE(1969)-6015-C block casting number, so the engine's been swapped.

Casting numbers cannot be cross referenced to Ford parts numbers, but it could be a 351W, introduced in 1969.

The 351C was not introduced until 1970 and has EIGHT valve cover bolt holes per side. The 351W has SIX.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 05:09 PM
  #20  
rsargent's Avatar
rsargent
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Jasper
Cleveland's also have the water pump inlet in the block while the Windsor's have it in the intake manifold.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 07:38 PM
  #21  
rsargent's Avatar
rsargent
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Jasper
OK, guys. A little technical help here please. Trying to figure out what cam may/may not be in this 351W. Anybody know what the specs are on the stock cam and the HO cam? Valve lift and duration? Took a couple of basic measurements and came up with something close to.....

#1 cylinder:
Intake rocker arm at push rod - .125 movement full open to full close
Exhaust rocker arm at push rod - .251 movement full open to full close
Cranshaft rotation is about 220* from intake valve full open to full close.

Am I measuring anything pertinent? If not, how could I check it without pulling the cam? Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 11:20 PM
  #22  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
To accurately measure cam lift you will want to remove the rocker arm in question so that lifter collapse due to spring pressure isn't a factor.
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 04:33 AM
  #23  
rsargent's Avatar
rsargent
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Jasper
So just measure the difference in height of the push rod itself, from, what would be, open to close stroke?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 09:03 AM
  #24  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Yes that's right.
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 08:29 PM
  #25  
rsargent's Avatar
rsargent
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Jasper
Ok, I'll measure that this weekend. 1st casualty. Broke an intake bolt getting it off. Front, driver's side. Pretty much even with the head. Taking the heads to the machine shop anyway for cleaning and grinding valve seats so I'll have them get it out and retap. On a positive note, the valley looks pretty good. Not cruddy at all. Cast numbers in valley...351 WCP 22. That confirms it, right? 351 windsor. Mean anything else? Heads didn't look too bad. Oil galleys may be clogged. Quite a bit of sludge on the bottom edge, near the valve cover seat. Hard, greasy gunk. Good dip will clean that right up. I'll, hopefully get the heads off this weekend and see what kind of shape the cylinders and lifters are in. I'll check bore and stroke while I'm at it. Opinions or advice? Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 08:53 PM
  #26  
rsargent's Avatar
rsargent
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Jasper
Found out 351 WCP 22 means 351 Windsor Casting Plant Number 22. Nothing significant.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2010 | 06:42 PM
  #27  
rsargent's Avatar
rsargent
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Jasper
Head casting numbers?

Ignore the subject line, please.....Found it. Got the RH head off. Above the #1 cylinder is D80E. Above #3 is 52. Above #4 is AB. After researching for the past couple of hours, the internet consensus is they're not good for much of anything. It's going to cost me $150 for the set just to have them vatted and the valve seat ground, and they need it. So, that 150 that could be better spent buying another set of heads. I just plan on using the truck for a daily driver but would like to have a little oomph to it when I hit the gas. Say......300-350 hp. No towing to speak of. However, she weighs 4200lbs so a little extra kick wouldn't hurt. Just 87 octane gas. Around 3.00 rear end gears. Got a C4 transmission so she won't take much abuse. 4V carb. No EFI. Given that, which heads would fit the bill. Looks like I can pick up a set of E7TE's or GT40P's for under $500. Either one of those work or anybody got any other suggestions?
 

Last edited by rsargent; Jul 16, 2010 at 09:17 PM. Reason: Found more info
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Theevilhacker
1997 - 2003 F150
3
Jul 28, 2016 12:19 AM
veni85
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
14
Dec 12, 2015 10:57 AM
BigRobK
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
Dec 9, 2015 05:44 AM
MarkyB98
Y-Block V8 (239, 272, 292, 312, 317, 341, 368)
3
Aug 28, 2015 03:12 PM
roshan
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
20
Aug 9, 2013 10:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE