289 in 65 econo pickup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-06-2010, 11:02 AM
rpieper52's Avatar
rpieper52
rpieper52 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
289 in 65 econo pickup

Gentlemen, am considering buying a 65 econoline pickup with a newly installed 289 (my first econo). My big concern is whether this engine will require a larger than standard radiator or other measures to provide proper cooling for highway driving (Northern CA). Also will this engine generate heat in the cab and will insulating the dog house cause any problems. Thanks for your help
 
  #2  
Old 04-18-2010, 01:11 PM
Fat Diesel's Avatar
Fat Diesel
Fat Diesel is offline
Logistics Pro

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Posts: 3,717
Received 98 Likes on 54 Posts
Hey welcome to FTE! I don't know the answers to your questions but I do have a 289 in a 64 Falcon convertible and those cars were initially designed as small sixes so the radiator design is pretty small. Still fine for it though. I'd try it out and then decide if you need an aluminum radiator or something for it.
 
  #3  
Old 04-18-2010, 10:10 PM
rpieper52's Avatar
rpieper52
rpieper52 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks FD - most people seem to think it wont be a problem either so good to hear confirmation from you.
 
  #4  
Old 04-27-2010, 10:04 PM
66gpw's Avatar
66gpw
66gpw is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Delisle/Vanscoy, Sk.
Posts: 4,402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The 65 Econolines have bigger rads than the early ones. It should work fine.. They are hooks to either a 240 or 300 engines. So they produce lots of heat.
The doghouse were only insulated on the lids. It does get warm, but I just open the vents.
 
  #5  
Old 04-30-2010, 09:52 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by Fat Diesel
Hey welcome to FTE! I don't know the answers to your questions but I do have a 289 in a 64 Falcon convertible and those cars were initially designed as small sixes so the radiator design is pretty small.
The 289 wasn't available in Falcons until 1965. 1963 1/2's & 1964's were only available with the 260.

The radiator is different with V8's than it is for I-6's. The same radiators used in 1963/65 Falcon's were also used in 1965/66 Mustangs.
 
  #6  
Old 04-30-2010, 10:08 AM
Fat Diesel's Avatar
Fat Diesel
Fat Diesel is offline
Logistics Pro

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Posts: 3,717
Received 98 Likes on 54 Posts
Thanks Bill. I put the 289 in about 22 years ago or so. What I meant was the physical size or the radiator, height and width, was established before the decision to add the V8. And for the record, doesn't the radiator in a Falcon have a slightly different inlet-outlet configuration than the Mustang?
 
  #7  
Old 06-22-2010, 10:06 PM
themoondick's Avatar
themoondick
themoondick is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my experience, anything less than a 4 core radiator will get hot in a V8 econoline. I bought a 4 core rad for a 67 mustang, had my radiator guy swap the mounting brackets -left side to rt, rt to left- Then it'll bolt right up. You may have to use a bit of imagination to line up rad hoses, but its SO worth it in the hot summers.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jlincks
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
10-06-2014 09:14 PM
meatpies
Ranchero & 1961 - 1967 Econoline
3
11-01-2013 08:57 PM
linusr
Ranchero & 1961 - 1967 Econoline
3
02-26-2013 05:57 AM
archxj
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
15
12-22-2008 09:53 AM
Econo62
Ranchero & 1961 - 1967 Econoline
8
06-09-2004 05:45 AM



Quick Reply: 289 in 65 econo pickup



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 PM.