Speed Pro Pistons? 351W
#1
Speed Pro Pistons? 351W
Anybody use Speed pro Flat top Hyperutectic pistons? Pn H336CP30 for .030 over.
I am considering a set I saw on Ebay for $140.
my concern is their weight of 624 grams. how does that compare to the stock piston weight? Which I don't know yet.
Can they be put in without rebalancing the rotating assembly?
I am considering a set I saw on Ebay for $140.
my concern is their weight of 624 grams. how does that compare to the stock piston weight? Which I don't know yet.
Can they be put in without rebalancing the rotating assembly?
#2
#3
#4
This motor is for my '84 250 plow truck, started out as just a ring and bearing job that has evolved into Edelbrock Performer motor w/ GT40P heads. I have about $1300 in this one and am starting to feel like I should replace the slugs.
I pull 12,000# boat and the stock 351W was always Matted to the floor. So I thought I'd up the cam a bit. Next thing I know after some beers, I have a new cam & lifters, a used 600 performer carb & Intake, and GT40P heads coming. Oh yeah and an Angry Wife. HOT ROD PLOW TRUCK HUH?? . Yeah, but Honey our boat is so heavy!!
Crank looks good, so I'm dropping a set .001" bearings in it, to tighten it up a bit.
I weighed a stock piston to be 647.7g where as these Flat top Hypers weigh 624g. I'm not thinking that is good - 24 grams.
Since I started this thread, I talked to the guy who balanced my last crank. He said the Speed Pro's run light. Guess he was right. he also said we might be able to make up the difference with some heavier pins. otherwise another 250 bucks to balance. No wonder she wants to keep me in the house.
Beanscoot,
I called Jegs cuz I could't find a Speedpro tech line. He said they would go right in too. But now that I wieghed them, I'm not think so. At least not without heavier pins or a balance job.
#5
#6
Excellent point on the gears, I have 4:10's to replace the rear with when I put the TruTrac in (currently 3.50's). But I'm still looking for a set for the front
#7
Trending Topics
#9
#10
I understand that GT40P have a 59cc chamber. Also when replacing a 65cc with a 59cc causes the CR to increase .6 ( must be true - I read it on the internet). So that is approxamately .1 increase in CR per 1cc reduction of chamber volume.
These pistons advertise to be 9.14 CR with a 60.4cc head. and these heads are 59 then I should end up with 9.28 CR.
But will verify the compression Ratio during the assembly.
The new pistons showed up last night and the wrist pin is quite a bit thicker than the stock one.
So I took them to my work's lab and had them weighed with a good scale.
Old Piston and Pin was 789.7g total
648g piston + 141.7 pin
New Piston and Pin was 790.9g total
641g piston + 149.9 pin (piston advertised 624g)
1.2 grams over 790grams = .15% difference
So now I feel a lot better about just using them.
As far as the header fit issue, man there's alot of controversy on the subject. Looking at some pics and I read that there is one of the rear plugs gets close to long tube headers. I'm gonna try it. For now though, it will have stock exhaust manifolds, so i hope there won't be a problem. I'll probably learn the hard way. That seems to be the best way for me. a little dense.
These pistons advertise to be 9.14 CR with a 60.4cc head. and these heads are 59 then I should end up with 9.28 CR.
But will verify the compression Ratio during the assembly.
The new pistons showed up last night and the wrist pin is quite a bit thicker than the stock one.
So I took them to my work's lab and had them weighed with a good scale.
Old Piston and Pin was 789.7g total
648g piston + 141.7 pin
New Piston and Pin was 790.9g total
641g piston + 149.9 pin (piston advertised 624g)
1.2 grams over 790grams = .15% difference
So now I feel a lot better about just using them.
As far as the header fit issue, man there's alot of controversy on the subject. Looking at some pics and I read that there is one of the rear plugs gets close to long tube headers. I'm gonna try it. For now though, it will have stock exhaust manifolds, so i hope there won't be a problem. I'll probably learn the hard way. That seems to be the best way for me. a little dense.
#12
I dont think you are going to get away with stock manifolds. I have ran the summit branded shortys, and the stainless ford racing shortys. The summit ones cleared the spark plugs better, requiring only a slight dent on #8. The Ford racing ones required a big dent and a $13 spark plug on #4.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nick-1973-ford
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
2
01-04-2017 09:02 AM
cruz76
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
16
10-19-2016 05:35 PM
F-250 restorer
Ford Truck Parts for Sale
0
08-07-2016 07:39 PM
wyldstallyn73
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
3
08-15-2008 11:59 PM