1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis Econolines. E150, E250, E350, E450 and E550

Report your MPGs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 06-07-2010, 10:33 PM
jimbbski's Avatar
jimbbski
jimbbski is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1988 E250 Extended Club Wagon W/351 EFI, C6 auto & 3.50 rear. Stock with a slightly modified exhaust.
10 mpg towing a trailer with a race car on hwy.
12-13 hwy non-towing on hwy.

Don't know city, don't drive it there much.

P.S. - mpg may be better then it appears as the tires are oversize (bigger then stock) and the odometer is under reporting miles driven.
 
  #17  
Old 09-03-2011, 12:42 AM
Bbasso's Avatar
Bbasso
Bbasso is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: infraction
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bbasso
describe your van.
describe the driving.
And report miles per gallon.
2005 V10 with torqshifts trans, SCT tuner set at 93octane tow tune. all else stock.
VERY FLAT 7 mile road, outside temp 73, cruise control set at 45mph and loaded about 800 pounds. and I saw this:


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
 
  #18  
Old 09-03-2011, 03:33 AM
joshofalltrades's Avatar
joshofalltrades
joshofalltrades is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
87 e350 6.9, c6, 3.54, 235/85r16, all stock, weighs 8000lbs when not towing or hauling extra loads
gets 16.5 when i'm driving nice, as low as 12 when towing and being aggressive together.
totally stock, 30k on engine rebuild, planning for a GV overdrive and a turbo, should easily put me over 20, and for a guy who is lined up to spend over $10k on fuel this year, its well worth the investment!
 
  #19  
Old 09-05-2011, 03:10 AM
YABADABADOO's Avatar
YABADABADOO
YABADABADOO is offline
New User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1989 E150 302 conversion 18.4 MPG imperial gallons ( 15.3 US ) at 102km/Hr ( 63 MPH ). Not sure of weight, 2 adults 3 children and bags. We all love this van. Hard on gas around town though, still cannot solve high idle issue.
 
  #20  
Old 09-06-2011, 08:45 AM
SilverE350's Avatar
SilverE350
SilverE350 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008, 12 passenger, 5.4L, 3.73, rolling on 265/75 16 Nitto Terra All Terains.

12 month, 13,xxx mile average, 60% city.
12.53 MPG

Light load @ 65: 15 MPG
Light load @ 55-60: 16-17 MPG
Towing a 6500# travel trailer @ 60 in "D": 9.25 MPG.

I wonder how much milage I'm loosing with the All Terrains.
 
  #21  
Old 09-06-2011, 04:29 PM
maples01's Avatar
maples01
maples01 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maryville
Posts: 4,768
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
^^It's the oversize tires that's doing you in obviously, my 99 5.4 with 3:50 geared 15 passenger gets that, while driving 72 MPH.
 
  #22  
Old 09-06-2011, 04:50 PM
SilverE350's Avatar
SilverE350
SilverE350 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by maples01
^^It's the oversize tires that's doing you in obviously, my 99 5.4 with 3:50 geared 15 passenger gets that, while driving 72 MPH.
The overall gearing in our vans is almost identical and my van is 10 years newer which could make a difference in emissions and resulting fuel economy. There are a whole lot of variables at play here beyond the tires to just conclude that the tire size is the issue, if there even is an issue. Although I think that a lower rolling resistance tire would improve the fuel economy somewhat.
 
  #23  
Old 09-06-2011, 05:30 PM
maples01's Avatar
maples01
maples01 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maryville
Posts: 4,768
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
I want lower gears, would love a 3:73 as the 3:50 is too high for my weight, your choice in tire size is bringing you close to 3:50 gears, it's too high, that's why the factory put in what you have. Hwy vans have 215/80 tires on them, the same diameter as my 245/75, but narrow, I prefer the width for stability because the tires are tall and vans are top heavy, guess which tires were on roll over vans.
Yeah, saying fuel economy is likely lost due to your van's age, you are absolutely right, yet my van is 6 years older than your and heavier with the same results, you may want to lose the lift and drop the tire size to stock.
 
  #24  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:33 PM
SilverE350's Avatar
SilverE350
SilverE350 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I meant that my newer van could possibly be meeting a higher emisions standard and as a result get poorer fuel economy. Pure speculation on my part. I'm actually content with my MPG's and live the way my van looks. All beefy and tough. But if a set of Michelins could make a big enough difference, I might spring for them, in a 235/85 16, gotta have the look.
 
  #25  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:53 PM
maples01's Avatar
maples01
maples01 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maryville
Posts: 4,768
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Kind of messed up but remember, the vans haven't changed, they are still the old 16 valve OHC setup, seems only the trucks change, would be nice to see a 3 or 4 valve in them from the factory. The higher they set, the more air they catch, I'd love to have one with a drop on it, streamline it a little.
 
  #26  
Old 09-07-2011, 09:51 PM
Bbasso's Avatar
Bbasso
Bbasso is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: infraction
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
While I'm into best MPGs some aren't, I try to balance MPG and looks equally.
 
  #27  
Old 09-08-2011, 03:11 AM
SilverE350's Avatar
SilverE350
SilverE350 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, if milage were that big a deal, I'm pretty sure most of us would not be driving these things.
 
  #28  
Old 09-08-2011, 03:48 AM
maples01's Avatar
maples01
maples01 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maryville
Posts: 4,768
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Ha, no choice for wheelchair users, the converted mini vans don't get much better mileage, ramp requires more room for entry, and they ain't cheap. I find it comical that the new Econoline has no EPA predicted MPG listed on them, an obvious sign that you best make sure you can afford to feed it before purchase.
 
  #29  
Old 09-09-2011, 07:22 AM
86scotty's Avatar
86scotty
86scotty is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: the old home place
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
02 E350 extended, stock wheels and tires, 75 on last weekend's trip in the pouring rain with about 1000 lbs including a roof rack with gear on it.
14 mpg
Ugh, guess I'm gonna have to slow down or just bite it and buy the gas.
Sure love the drive of the newer van though! Handles like a car!
 
  #30  
Old 09-09-2011, 08:23 AM
SilverE350's Avatar
SilverE350
SilverE350 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm thinking that the roof rack and your speed are the 2 biggest robbers of MPG.
 


Quick Reply: Report your MPGs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 PM.