Notices
General Automotive Discussion

Problems with Shell gas?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 10:50 PM
  #1  
Ford_Six's Avatar
Ford_Six
Thread Starter
|
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 18,488
Likes: 22
From: The Big, Oregon
Club FTE Gold Member
Problems with Shell gas?

The closest gas station to my house is a Shell station, and while I normally don't go there I had concerns over making it to the next one so I filled up and went on my way. After about 15miles, my gas gauge quit. I figured the float had developed a hole and sunk again, but after 2tanks of gas from my normal station, it was fine.
Has anyone else had some odd issues with Shell gas, or is this just a strange coincidence?
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 11:04 PM
  #2  
plumber01's Avatar
plumber01
Post Fiend
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,054
Likes: 0
From: HOUSTON, TX
I could not believe it when I read the thread, But my father stopped using Shell gas for the reason of crappy gas. Three times when he did use it he had engine trouble all threee times. I have stopped using it as a result but never had a problem with it myself as bad as dad did. I have noticed a little sluggish performance after filling up, but never really paid that much attention until now.
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 11:29 PM
  #3  
horsepuller's Avatar
horsepuller
FTE Leadership Emeritus
25 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,298
Likes: 45
From: Southern California
FTE Emeritus
Branded gasolines are not at all consistent throughout the country. When I worked for USA Petroleum we had ARCO, Unocal and Chevron tankers filling up at our rack. In addition to all the tankers hauling for unbranded stations. ARCO had their own additive tank and pump at our rack. So when the ARCO drivers scanned their card, their proprietary additive pump would come on. Other major brands would batch their own proprietary additive into the tanker before loading.

Gas is gas. What brands it is the proprietary additives. So brand name gasoline is only as good as the refinery that makes it and that is not always a name brand.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 09:50 AM
  #4  
jimandmandy's Avatar
jimandmandy
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,228
Likes: 5
From: Running Springs CA
Each part of the country may also have different emissions requirements, so ethanol percent, vapor pressure and other specifications could be different. Here in CA, RFG II means that Scott is right, its all the same, except the detergents. In other parts, it may be different. The Los Angeles area has at least one refinery owned by each company, BP (ARCO), Chevron, Conoco (76), ExxonMobil, Shell and Valero, but Im sure they still share product from time to time. I've never noticed a difference, but use only name brands to get the best detergents.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 11:57 AM
  #5  
jim henderson's Avatar
jim henderson
Postmaster
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
i think it is coincidence and maybe your patch failed due to coincidence or maybe the detergent pack ate it.

Yah gasoline is a commodity and the difference at the pump is what the additive package was when the tanker filled up.

I have driven for almost 40 years and never noticed a significant difference on any of my vehicles. I keep them fairly well maintained and run some fuel system cleaner thru them periodically so wild guess is my engines are running well enough that a minor difference in gas doesn't affect them.

Just my opinion,

Jim Henderson
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 01:25 PM
  #6  
Ford_Six's Avatar
Ford_Six
Thread Starter
|
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 18,488
Likes: 22
From: The Big, Oregon
Club FTE Gold Member
It didn't fail, though. After a couple tanks of my regular gas, it's working fine.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 03:19 PM
  #7  
MikeB 88's Avatar
MikeB 88
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 1
I use Shell's unblended gas in my 2000 Ranger and my '69 Thunderbird. I have no troubles/problems.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 04:47 PM
  #8  
Furyus1's Avatar
Furyus1
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,940
Likes: 8
From: Southern Oregon Coast
Originally Posted by Ford_Six
It didn't fail, though. After a couple tanks of my regular gas, it's working fine.
If it's in that van, it wouldn't be the first time something strange happened with it...
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 06:44 PM
  #9  
Ford_Six's Avatar
Ford_Six
Thread Starter
|
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 18,488
Likes: 22
From: The Big, Oregon
Club FTE Gold Member
I'm finding that every now and then- It has quirks, that's for sure.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 08:11 PM
  #10  
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Rogue_Wulff
Post Fiend
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,521
Likes: 16
From: Lost
The only shell branded station around here sells E10, and I avoid buying E10 anytime possible. There's a few Conoco/Phillips stations that prominently display the "Ethanol free" banners, and with the fines they would get for selling ethanol blended fuel without a label on the pump is high enough to prevent ($10K per day per pump) anyone from even thinking about doing it, therefore I tend to buy all my fuel from them.
I just don't like the idea of putting corn syrup into my fuel tank..........
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 09:18 AM
  #11  
jimandmandy's Avatar
jimandmandy
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,228
Likes: 5
From: Running Springs CA
All gasoline is E10 by law in much of the country, so there is no avoiding it.

Jim
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 10:21 AM
  #12  
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Rogue_Wulff
Post Fiend
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,521
Likes: 16
From: Lost
Originally Posted by jimandmandy
All gasoline is E10 by law in much of the country, so there is no avoiding it.

Jim
Maybe not in some areas, but around here we still have the option to avoid it. I will continue to use 100% gasoline as long as I have the choice. 10% ethanol costs me 15% in MPG, I've checked several times.
21-23 MPG on E10, and 25-27 MPG on 100% gas.
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 11:07 AM
  #13  
fepowerguy8's Avatar
fepowerguy8
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
From: Loganville, WI
I too avoid ethanol gas at all cost as its the older vehicles carb seals and my cars run worse on it. Unfortunately I'm running out of places to get 93 octane as well. And the last couple years I've had terrible luck with watered down gas. There are only 3 gas stations within a 25 mile radius of me that sell non ethanol gas and none offer 93 octane, 1 kwik trip, 1 BP and 1 phillips 66. I've gotten in the practice of putting heet and octane booster everytime I fill up, it's stupid I have to do that. My friends and I all have issues with pinging with anything less then 93 octane, but all the 93 octane has ethanol around here and that wrecks'em. Just my experience.
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 11:29 AM
  #14  
Furyus1's Avatar
Furyus1
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,940
Likes: 8
From: Southern Oregon Coast
Which brings up the question as to why it's being claimed there is a gasoline shortage when there isn't that much actual gasoline in the fuel? It's mostly ethanol, detergents, and whatever else they decide to throw in...
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 12:46 PM
  #15  
fepowerguy8's Avatar
fepowerguy8
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
From: Loganville, WI
it's an engineered gas shortage to raise the cost of gasoline, like they did in the 70's with the oil shortage to jack the price.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 AM.