Notices
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

standard transmissions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 01:58 PM
  #1  
f1001969mike's Avatar
f1001969mike
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
standard transmissions

hey whats up, i recently posted a thread about the m5od standard transmission...but i lost the link lol, anyway i was planning on putting a beefed up 351 in my truck, and wanted to know if the m5od would handle it.

1989 ford bronco
302 v8
m5od standard tranny
dana 44 front dif, 8.8 rear


i was told it wasnt, that the gearing was horrible and i should look for a zf 5 speed

i was wondering though, i have found a few older broncos, 78's and 79's, a couple have what i believe to be np-435 transmissions in them, would one of those fit?

im basically looking for a tougher gearbox, be it a four or a five speed, that will bolt in with next to no modification at all, i dont wanna have to spend alot anybody got any tips?
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 02:44 PM
  #2  
andym's Avatar
andym
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,402
Likes: 38
From: Bonita Springs FL
Here's the thread: https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/9...nsmission.html

The search function is a wonderful thing.

An NP-435 or T-18 would be a good choice. They are a lot cheaper than the ZF and much easier to find. You'd need the correct bellhousing but they are removable on those transmissions.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 02:58 PM
  #3  
mprice's Avatar
mprice
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 601
Likes: 1
From: Chicagoland
Clicking "User CP" at the far left of the top of the page will bring up a list of recent threads you are active in. If it's been a while there's a link from there that will show all subscribed threads.

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/usercp.php
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/s...n&folderid=all
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 04:02 PM
  #4  
f1001969mike's Avatar
f1001969mike
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
thanks for that tip, so are you saying the 78 bronco tranny is a bolt on thing?, what about the clutch its mechanical for those years right? can it be adapted to hydraulic?

there are a couple with small block bellhousings on them, the scrap yard i go to doesnt have many cars newer than 1980 needless to say its a great place.

if that bronco trany will mount up without a hitch, is there anything else that needs to be modified? u-joints ect, i definetly dont wanna change driveshaft length, i wanna keep it as simple as possible
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 04:27 PM
  #5  
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,285
Likes: 12
From: Bend,OR
no matter which tranny you bolt up with you will have to move the tranny mount and perhaps get your driveshafts lengthened/shortend.

the np435 is great but find one that is an 80's model since it should have the hydrolic clutch otherwise you will need to convert an older np435 over to hydrolic clutch.

the zf even though its a bit spendy is crazy strong and gives you the best of an NP435 (strength and granny low first) with the benny's of an overdrive (5th) gear.

but anyway you go something will require changes to your current setup. no way around that.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 07:49 PM
  #6  
f1001969mike's Avatar
f1001969mike
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
moveing the tranny mount's not a prob, the thing id like to avoid is driveshaft modification, i just read on wikipedia that the wheel base for the first big broncos is 104, and that stays the same til 87 where it goes up to 104.7
this concerns me because i just bought a front clip off of an 86 for my 89 cause i like it better, the core support and all that seems to match up according to my measurements, im also cutting the rear quarters off, because there rotten, and replaceing them with 86 style quarters from lmc

now im guessing which is something i hate doing, that the difference is something suttle in the drive train and not the frame itself which would be fine mabey the rear end got moved a little farther back or sumthing i know what im doin sounds nuts but the fenders are gone and the rear quarters are gone so why not replace them with something more attractive?

anyway so is .7 inches gonna mean a driveshaft mod? cause i noticed the rear shaft has a slip yoke design on the 89, mabey the extra 18 mm wont be that big a difference?and how would i convert an older np-435 to hydraulic would i just need the bracket for the cylinder do ya think? or the entire bellhousing?
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 08:06 AM
  #7  
andym's Avatar
andym
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,402
Likes: 38
From: Bonita Springs FL
0.7" isn't going to require a new driveshaft but a different transmission definitely will.

You can convert any tranny to hydraulic if you want. You just need a hydraulic bellhousing, the master & slave cylinders, and I believe the pedal assembly is different as well. Hopefully someone can confirm that.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 06:33 PM
  #8  
mtufreerider's Avatar
mtufreerider
Junior User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Milford, MI
The peddle assembly is different yes, not to sure about the rest but I too believe they are different.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 07:14 PM
  #9  
kenpobuck's Avatar
kenpobuck
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,789
Likes: 5
From: Sand GAp, KY
Yes the pedal set up is different. As well as the throw fork being longer so it is out far enough for the slave cylinder. If you go hydraulic buy or fab up the stiffener plate for the firewall where the master bolts on. The firewall is known to crack there from the force of the pedal. If you can find a yard with a Bronco wit hthe same drive train you plan to use just get those shafts. I used to have several differnt shafts on hand jsut in case i decided to swap trannies lol.
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2010 | 10:18 PM
  #10  
alxsnmr's Avatar
alxsnmr
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 1
From: St Louis
The T-18 was still installed up to at least 1990, and those trucks were hydrualic clutched trucks. The only two I ever saw in the 87 to 91 trucks were behind I6 engines, but that is the same bellhousing used on the 351. I saw an 86 F150 with a t18 that was external slave on a 302, so the bellhousings are available. Ford also had a standardized bellhousing bolt pattern if I remember correctly. Which means an NP435 and T18/19 could be bolted to the same bellhousing as long as it was a trans manufactured for Ford, not a Dodge or GM unit. I am not positive on Dodges except from what I have heard as possbilities that Dodge versions sometimes shared the ford bolt pattern (it may be only AMC versions that I may confuse that with).
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 08:15 AM
  #11  
andym's Avatar
andym
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,402
Likes: 38
From: Bonita Springs FL
If you buy my truck you can get all the parts you need for the swap in one place!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Milt51
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Feb 4, 2014 02:50 PM
dh1989
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
Jul 22, 2013 07:28 AM
Edward_U
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
35
Aug 31, 2011 12:24 PM
rick4106
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
May 4, 2010 09:58 AM
f1001969mike
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
27
Apr 11, 2010 11:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE