Notices

428 Cobra Jet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 04:15 PM
  #1  
Texaswildman's Avatar
Texaswildman
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
428 Cobra Jet

Hey guys, I'm new to this forum. I have just aquired a 75 f100 with a built 428cj.

My question is this, how much hp/tq will this engine have with the following mods?:

Bored to 4.170
Edelbrock performer cam
Edelbrock performer RPM aluminum heads
Edelbrock performer aluminum intake
Harlan aluminum roller rockers
Hooker headers (ceramic coated)
660 Thunder Series Carb
Full MSDS ignition
Don't know compression
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 09:21 PM
  #2  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
Most claimed 428 CJ's turn out to be stock 390s.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2010 | 03:47 AM
  #3  
RapidRuss's Avatar
RapidRuss
FE "Freakin Expensive"
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 4
From: Smith Mountain Lake, VA
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Texaswildman
Hey guys, I'm new to this forum. I have just aquired a 75 f100 with a built 428cj.

My question is this, how much hp/tq will this engine have with the following mods?:

Bored to 4.170
Edelbrock performer cam
Edelbrock performer RPM aluminum heads
Edelbrock performer aluminum intake
Harlan aluminum roller rockers
Hooker headers (ceramic coated)
660 Thunder Series Carb
Full MSDS ignition
Don't know compression
Well if it is indeed built as you claim.. the extra bore is probably good for about 10hp over stock if the the same compressin was kept as stock ? the edhead cam No specs were given so thats a hard call..But if it the hydraulic cam I'am thinking of it not much better than a stock CJ cam from the factory.. The untouched RPM head run about 270cfm out of the box..So you lost some weight..But not really and cfm over stock CJ head as far as flow goes..the Performer intake isnt really anything but a aluminum cast stocker ford intake..roller rockers picked up a couple hp....as do the headers..ignition is ignition not really proved to pick up hp ..just make the engine run smoother and easier starts.. Not knowing the compression is a big deal...So just a WAG..I'd say maybe 400 to 425hp....Stock was around 400 to 410hp.. and maybe not even that ? as I see your under carbed...Stock CJ came with the 735cfm Holley....If I recall right..

Bear cut the guy some slack...He's a Newbie here !! Where's your manners ? LOL..You cranky Old ***** you !
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2010 | 07:20 AM
  #4  
Texaswildman's Avatar
Texaswildman
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Thank you RapidRuss. I understand that the only way to tell a 428 is to remove the frost plug and check for a stamp?
It does have a engine manfacture date of 3/69 though. If it turned out to be a 390 with the mods done wouldn't it still be around 400hp?
I will do a compression check and report.
Yeah, I think the former owner was running the smaller carb for mpg purposes. I have had a lot of luck in the past with Street Avenger 770's for other big blocks. Never had a Ford bb though. That should wake it up I would think though.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2010 | 07:34 AM
  #5  
RapidRuss's Avatar
RapidRuss
FE "Freakin Expensive"
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 4
From: Smith Mountain Lake, VA
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Texaswildman
Thank you RapidRuss. I understand that the only way to tell a 428 is to remove the frost plug and check for a stamp?
It does have a engine manfacture date of 3/69 though. If it turned out to be a 390 with the mods done wouldn't it still be around 400hp?
I will do a compression check and report.
Yeah, I think the former owner was running the smaller carb for mpg purposes. I have had a lot of luck in the past with Street Avenger 770's for other big blocks. Never had a Ford bb though. That should wake it up I would think though.
Well the only way your going to find out about the bore size, Is to pull a head... and a 390 block wont take a .120" over bore.... So is its found that its a built 69 car engine..and bore .030" to .060" Max.. It might be at another WAG a 375hp motor....again just a guess without knowing all the specs of the internal parts.. JMHO... Good Luck..Chime back in when you know more about the build..
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2010 | 09:47 AM
  #6  
MeanGene427's Avatar
MeanGene427
Tuned
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 360
Likes: 3
From: Napa
If it is a CJ or any 428, why would you want to bore it .040 over right off the bat (unless somebody already hacked it .030)? At .040 it's pretty much at the end of it's life, the occasional block might go a little further, but you'll never notice any difference in power from that much bore, and it would probably actually run better with a smaller bore and thicker, stiffer cylinder walls. Old-time thinking when blocks were plentiful was to punch it .030 as it would always clean up there if it wasn't scored, but many times a very minimal overbore will clean it up, and a rare block is worth buying custom pistons for, allowing it to be rebuilt several more times. I sure hate finding 427 blocks that got punched .030 in the "old days"
Of course, every FE for sale is a 427 or 428, just like every 350 Chebbie is an LT-1, right? Look at the casting # between the two center exhaust ports, CJ heads for '69 would be C80E-N, and will have 4 bolts around each exhaust port.
Did you get the "manufacture date" from a tag bolted to the intake? Check for a casting date code on the block, right next to the oil filter adapter, should be early '69, a little before the build date, something like 9(year)B(month, February)14(day of the month)- 9B20 or similar for a build date in March '69
And if it does turn out to be a genuine CJ and isn't hacked up too bad, you could sell all the CJ stuff and finance a sweet new 445 stroker using one of Barry's kits and a 390 block, and have a very torquey engine, that is much better suited to pickup use than a 428CJ
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 06:22 PM
  #7  
Texaswildman's Avatar
Texaswildman
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Man guys, I have to say I am p*ssed. Tell me what this means, I found this under the driver's side head at the front of the engine
63
352


I am guessing year and what the block actually is. Tell me I'm wrong.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 06:37 PM
  #8  
Texaswildman's Avatar
Texaswildman
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Ok, seems that that all have that code on them. Sheww.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 07:14 PM
  #9  
Texaswildman's Avatar
Texaswildman
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
What manufacture date is this?
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 07:51 PM
  #10  
MeanGene427's Avatar
MeanGene427
Tuned
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 360
Likes: 3
From: Napa
Originally Posted by Texaswildman
Man guys, I have to say I am p*ssed. Tell me what this means, I found this under the driver's side head at the front of the engine
63
352


I am guessing year and what the block actually is. Tell me I'm wrong.
Lots of 427's say "352" on the front, and some 360's and 390's say "66-427" on the back behind the flywheel- you're not the first to say WTF???
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #11  
sc00ter's Avatar
sc00ter
Senior User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
I think 375 to 400 hp is real generous. It takes big compression and a way bigger cam than the plain-jane performer to make that kind of power. I'd believe it with the Performer RPM cam and intake with a 750 cfm carb. If you want to be sure its got a 428 crank, pull a spark plug and check the stroke- 428s and 410s have nearly 4".
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
77_f250_custom
Ford Truck Parts for Sale
16
Mar 25, 2015 10:53 PM
Purebeef
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
6
Jul 7, 2014 05:09 PM
1977 f-350
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
11
Nov 27, 2011 10:06 PM
73 ford guy
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
29
Feb 12, 2010 08:51 PM
J Hodges
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
37
Jan 21, 2009 01:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE