Notices
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) Diesel Topics Only

DYI Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 08:51 PM
  #16  
F250FarmBoy's Avatar
F250FarmBoy
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: North-Eastern, Ohio
Yeah, I was thinking of that as well. This truck doesn't get driven as much as I'd want to, I only put around 1500 miles on it since june. but when I do drive it, a turbo would be helpful.

I wouldn't mind putting it in the engine bay like the rest of them, but I like to be different. And there are some benefits to having it out of the engine bay.

As to the OP, try searching PSD turbo and see what comes up. Sorry for 'jacking this thread with my imagination. lol
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 09:26 PM
  #17  
jwyard's Avatar
jwyard
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by F250FarmBoy
I am planning to remote mount a turbo my the transfer case right off the y-pipe. I've got plenty of time to pick a turbo and plan it out cause it won't happen for a while haha.

But shouldn't you be able to adjust the wastegate on the PSD turbos to compensate for the higher compression/boost?
The remote idea wouldn't be bad. It would make the exhaust work WAY easier. I think I'm going to keep it up top though. Oil return is a big issue if you mount it down low. Have to buy/mount a pump to circulate the oil. A waste gate, either in the exhaust or mounted to the Y pipe would be the way to control boost. I have a turbo off a 97 and I'm pretty sure it has one built in the turbine side.
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 09:28 PM
  #18  
starmilt's Avatar
starmilt
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 10,501
Likes: 5
From: Faibanks Ak.
I know this much if a stroke turbo would work anywhere near easy, at the prices I have seen them go for we all would have one or two or three. lol
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 09:32 PM
  #19  
jwyard's Avatar
jwyard
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by starmilt
Careful putting a box around it things like that tend to fil up with leaves and grass and could start a fire. There has been lots of heavy equipment burn down because the bellypan held grass and debris. It wouldnt take much of a splash of water to toast a turbo.
Didnt think about the fire issue down low. That could cause problems.
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 09:41 PM
  #20  
jwyard's Avatar
jwyard
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by starmilt
I know this much if a stroke turbo would work anywhere near easy, at the prices I have seen them go for we all would have one or two or three. lol
It would'nt be a saturday afternoon project, but I'm going to have my truck apart, so I think I'll modify the fire wall a little to make it easier to get the hot side ran. Just a y pipe up the back of the motor, bracket for the turbo, and get the down pipe going back down under the truck. Mine won't be smashed shut like the factory lol. Guess I'll see how I make out.
Thanks
Jeremy
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 09:47 PM
  #21  
Cruickie's Avatar
Cruickie
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Seems to me that this would be something neat to do just for fun..... and I considered giving a try at some point but decided against it for the following reasons:

1) Oil Return. Would have to rig up a scavenge pump of some sort having the turbo mounted below or level with the sump

2) Protection. I personaly am not terribly concerned with hard strikes with my truck... it's not even 4X4 and I have no intention of trying to use is as such. My big concern is exactly what Starmilt said. WATER. I could see a little splash of cold water on a smokin hot turbo leading to some bad things. Can anyone say thermal shock?

3) All the plumbing required. Granted it would make the exhaust easier to rig up but that's a lot of intake! And I suspect some pretty horrible turbo lag. I figure the turbo lag wouldn't be an issue for me because I'm slow enough that I be fine with taken a little longer!

Just my 2 cents........ I do think it would be kinda neat to rig up just for fun if you had the parts laying around and didn't have to soak a lot of money into it.
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 09:49 PM
  #22  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Originally Posted by starmilt
I know this much if a stroke turbo would work anywhere near easy, at the prices I have seen them go for we all would have one or two or three. lol
Ya, I passed on one with everything there for $200 a few months back.
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 10:44 PM
  #23  
hairyboxnoogle's Avatar
hairyboxnoogle
Lead Driver
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,942
Likes: 13
Remote mounting the turbo also causes you to lose alot of heat, heat wrap and double walled pipe only can do so much.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 11:44 PM
  #24  
timothyr's Avatar
timothyr
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
keep in mind, my experience is in gasser turbos, put the concept on remote is the same...moving it out of the engine compartment will trop the turbo temp (as in casing and turbine) by a several hundred degrees, as well as drop the charge air temps going into the engine...but you also need the turbo and plumbing sized properly because your air volume to spin the turbo further down the line will be different.

Although all of my apps have been on cars, I have never had an issue with water causing damage, other than once when I had a small leak in the turbine intake line and it ingested water...no motor damage, but the turbo had to be rebuilt...and that was driving through 10" of standing water in a car that sat 4" off the ground...water was easily over the exhaust pipes.

Keep in mind, you cant compare remote turbos to cats....cats are designed to get hot for a chemical reaction, turbos simply use air movement (which depending on the situation can be very hot) to turn a fan.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 11:02 AM
  #25  
wreckinball's Avatar
wreckinball
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,086
Likes: 1
From: Malahat/Cowichan Valley
i would think that it could be done responsibly. In this and many other threads i have learned a lot about turbos. I never knew that it pulled air rather than pushed air in. I always thought they rammed air in. I still dont understand them that well but with more air, more fuel, anything goes faster. I wonder the limitations of installation points for a turbo in light of recent conversation. As long as it is on the pipe and there are no leaks or weak points, i would guess anywhere but i amy be way off. More spelunking to do i guess!
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 11:44 AM
  #26  
timothyr's Avatar
timothyr
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Being that 99% of the time a turbo is mounted right off the manifold the majority of the rules/guidelines/whatever are based on this...and those do change alot when you start moving further down the pipe. Obviously there are the plumbing issues (oil cooling etc), but you also have to adjust your turbo size (air will not be as hot coming in, hence you will get less spin from it), and your charge air pipe (like your comment on turbos pulling vs pushing, worthless but invaluable trivia, the longer the pipe the smaller the relative diameter to minimize lag).
Honestly, from playing with remote mounts for several years, I would not go any other way....to the point that I would put them in the bed of my truck before the engine bay. Once you get the calculations right you can make some mean and nasty instant boost without heatsoaking both your charge air or your motor...lower egt's, lower oil temps etc. In all of my raceing apps I have learned there are twwo envelopes you can push when making power...heat and pressure...push one or the other, cuz if you push them both its easy to make things go boom. Personally I prefer to push the pressure side as you can get alot more power there than heat.

As far as the question of "if its so great how come manufacturers don't do it"...look at the time & cost to properly fab on in, and your answer will be clear...mounted in the bay is very easy and cheap by comparison
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 12:06 PM
  #27  
starmilt's Avatar
starmilt
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 10,501
Likes: 5
From: Faibanks Ak.
I guess it depends on what you expect of your truck and how you use it. Personally since I use mine for any and everything I want to and do go offroad, sometimes in some serious places, an underbody would not be an option at all. I have been in driving conditions too where everything under me was one big block of ice. In the bed would be a better option for me but I also haul any and everything I want hence the reason I don't drive a bronco, so that is not an option either.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 12:08 PM
  #28  
wreckinball's Avatar
wreckinball
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,086
Likes: 1
From: Malahat/Cowichan Valley
well yeah i was wondering if you pulled the math out, you could theoretically mount a turbo at the floor of the truck bed haha. Would be an interesting sound coming from the bed area of a truck for sure.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 12:20 PM
  #29  
timothyr's Avatar
timothyr
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
one thought I was honestly considering....removing a section of the bed floor and mounting them just before a pair of 4" stacks.

Star....and this would be why I did not do remote mounts on my XJ...I have seen it done on wheeling rigs, but it takes some SERIOUS though and coin to make it happen right
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 12:33 PM
  #30  
wreckinball's Avatar
wreckinball
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,086
Likes: 1
From: Malahat/Cowichan Valley
right, if all you do is extreme off road, you would want to rethink the remote idea. If you just do highway hauling and similar, you would be good to go remote. You could probably make a box out of diamond plate that would house it with stiff metal screen to allow for ventilation and not let crap in.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE