When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I can't remember who posted this a while back, in another manual vs automatic thread, but it made sense to me.
It was something along the lines of:
"people who can't drive a manual have no choice but to buy an automatic. While those who prefer a manual often settle for an automatic."
I guess that's one reason why they sell so few manuals. Barely any dealers had them in stock and some folks don't want to wait for a special order, or don't mind settling for an auto.
I fall into the "settled for an auto" category as I was shopping for a used truck and used manuals were just too few and far between. I couldn't wait forever to get a truck and couldn't afford a new one, so I settled.
I could take either and have owned both over the years. Now with good tow haul programs in electronically controlled transmissions, I prefer the auto. After 120k miles of Dodge's rock solid but faux 5spd auto in a 2500HD Hemi Ram, the TS in my SD is the cat's tail! I'm hoping the real 5spd TS will be every bit as reliable and then some. Too bad the manual isn't going to be available even through special order for those who want it.
simple emmissions control, pcm can very precisely control shift points due to rpm engine load etc. pcm cannot control the drivers actions such as lugging engine, was told this in the early 90's at a gm training center.
I have heard of that too. So both the new 6.2 and the diesel would have to be certified with the old ZF transmission. I imagine thats a costly process.
Chalk this up to our out of control government, at least in part.
The new automatic will be a true 6 speed with manual mode, Tow haul, engine braking. Yes, its more expensive to get teh auto, but thats what ford wants, you to buy more product. I would go for a manual 6 speed, IF, I could get it with a factory Exhaust Brake, otherwise, the manual is no longer the way to go IMO, because you have no engine braking. I dont see why they can't program this into the PCM, using the VGT, to have a manual hold back as good or close to as good as an auto. I sure like my torqueshift with the T/H, in the hills, up or down, it sure handles the weight of the trailer well. Before this truck and the 2000 SD, I have only ever owned a manual and I really toiled with this one getting a manual, but like the previous post, it would have been a custom order, and I would have had to wait a long time to get it. Oh well, I sold my sole to get this one, it will be after 2015 before I am allowed a new truck, maybe by then a F350, 6.7 Scorpion, manual 6 speed with 2 speed rear, integrated exhaust brake ect will be possible. I would doa custom order for that. Alternatively, maybe a tuner will allow a retrofit of a ZF 6 speed and exhaust brake for the manual, the market could be there.
Not with a big trailer at max GCWR, even with some hold back with torqueshift, you dont have much more than 100 Hp hold back, with a exhaust brake, more like 200 is possible. With a manual, probably more like 50 Hp is all you can get I think. For my trailer, what I have works fine, I would want a stronger hold back with max GCWR pulling to save on service brakes, thats all I am saying.
sounds like you are flat out looking for a Jacobs compression brake...
The difference between the auto and the manual is that the manual can downshift and then clutch and release a couple of times before downshifting again, never touching the brakes. The auto just knows you are braking and figues it can help out.
Either way, throw an exhaust brake on there and it makes the engine harder to turn over, which aids in braking. Throw a Jacobs on there and you'll probably stop on a dime.
simple emmissions control, pcm can very precisely control shift points due to rpm engine load etc. pcm cannot control the drivers actions such as lugging engine, was told this in the early 90's at a gm training center.
Originally Posted by fordmanbrad
I have heard of that too. So both the new 6.2 and the diesel would have to be certified with the old ZF transmission. I imagine thats a costly process.
Chalk this up to our out of control government, at least in part.
Nope. Only vehicles under 8500 pound GVWR are certified as complete vehicles on a chassis dynamometer. Engines for use in trucks over 8500 pound GVWR (that's all F250 and up trucks) are certified on an engine dynamometer without a transmission present. The engine is certified by itself.
Ford is doing this because they don't sell enough manuals to make it profitable to offer one.
My opinion only:Six speed manual Xmision is hardly "useless". It is the best transmission put in a domestic pickup.If someone wished to have an exhaust brake on a manual equiped truck it wouldn't be a difficult job.
My dad has special-ordered two trucks (and 02 and an 08) fully loaded with the 6 spd manual. Probably pretty rare trucks, Lariats with a manual tranny!
He loves them and will have a meltdown if he can't get one in 2013!
Good idea, it's a worthless tranny anyway. Dangerous too, while you are concentrating on shifting you could be watching your driving better. You couldn't pay me to buy a vehicle with a stick.
You haven't driven a lot in snow & on black ice. With a manual you can jab the clutch in a slide and let the tread grab traction again. With an auto the wheels are driving or braking, just when you want no extra input. There's no time to take your hand off the wheel & get it into neutral.
I drive both and haven't yet found an auto that can pick gears better than the selector between my ears. When you want to relax with the brain turned off, go with the automatic. When you want to be engaged and enjoy the ride with maximum control, take the stick-shift.
Last edited by windjamer; Jan 2, 2010 at 07:52 PM.
Reason: spelling
Ford would sell more manuals if dealers would have them in stock, most people buy off the lots. Its a shame Ford is giving up the manuals. With GM axing manuals years ago and Dodge in the near future it would be good IMO if Ford was the only one offering a manual. Always good to have some options. If Ford want to save money get rid of Mercury, Mercury is nothing but optioned out Fords with a different badge on them.
I drove a manual for years and I was one of those guys that "Settled" for an auto in my SD. I felt like I was more in tune to driving with my manual truck and didn't get distracted near as easy.
Nope. Only vehicles under 8500 pound GVWR are certified as complete vehicles on a chassis dynamometer. Engines for use in trucks over 8500 pound GVWR (that's all F250 and up trucks) are certified on an engine dynamometer without a transmission present. The engine is certified by itself.
Ford is doing this because they don't sell enough manuals to make it profitable to offer one.
Are you sure they didn't change this with the new emissions stuff Mark? I'd be much happier blaming the EPA for the lack of a manual than thinking Ford is abandoning me. I had heard the emission rumor too, and liked that story better.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.