Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

mass air conversions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #16  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by big_ford_rednek
this is my plans, and this is what i was going off of. i copied it from a different thread.

its mainlly the fact that i dont want to have to rev it up that high to make power. i want a truck build, lower powerband, lotsa usable tourque downlow. if the motor doesnt make good tourque below 3,000 rpms, then whats the point.
Nothing wrong with that plan.

Originally Posted by big_ford_rednek
the truck intake is made for egr, where as most other intakes were not.
All Performer intakes have EGR, and it's completely internal on the car version so you don't have to rig up an external tube to the passenger exhaust manifold. And just so you know...the stock 5.8 EGR tube isn't long enough to reach the valve when it's mounted on the Eddy truck intake so you'll need a custom tube made.


Originally Posted by big_ford_rednek
also, if the edl truck intake makes 34 ft/lbs with e7's, wouldnt it make more with gt40's?
Potentially.. but at what rpm? The only graph I see is for the complete Performer engine package that includes the truck intake, performer heads, cam, TB, and shorty headers. All that produces a grand total of about 70ft/lbs more which is pretty lousy considering the cost of all those parts, you can get as much total TQ gain from a cam and longtubes on a stock motor and it'll produce more of that TQ at lower rpms.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 12:32 PM
  #17  
monkei's Avatar
monkei
More Turbo
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 606
Likes: 1
From: pleasanton, sfbay


30-80 ft/lb over stock depending on RPM, only when coupled with their heads, cam, headers, TB and exhaust. Geez, doesn't seem like the 5.8 version of these truck manifolds do much of anything to warrant the price tag.

This was not the case with my 5.0L which seemed to benefit from the long runner design on the Eddy truck intake. It got faster when I added the upper&lower to my K&N, longtubes, and exhaust, with stock e7s. Go figure, they say the 5.8 stock manifold is the worse of the two stock truck lowers, but the 5.8 Eddy truck does nothing for power, but the Eddy 5.0 does??
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 01:15 PM
  #18  
lew52's Avatar
lew52
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 2
I don't know about the 5.8 eddy intake, but the 5.0 eddy truck intake works good for me , good power from 2000 to 5800 rpm.....Lew
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 05:48 PM
  #19  
big_ford_rednek's Avatar
big_ford_rednek
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Coon Valley, WI
okay, so the trickflow r series upper intake with a bbk 75mm throttle body would suit my needs? i wont need any different fuel rails? everything with the egr will be fine?
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 07:01 PM
  #20  
monkei's Avatar
monkei
More Turbo
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 606
Likes: 1
From: pleasanton, sfbay
Whopping 34 ft/lbs? Doesn't seem too whopping for the $600 it costs to get it. I'm not trying to knock 'em or build em' up or anything; I bought both the 5.0 and 5.8 version, just decided that I'd rather go with a gt40 setup for my 351 swap, which flows better for about the same $ and is infamous for great torque production.

"Potentially.. but at what rpm?"

It says they make that 34ft/lb over stock at 3500rpm, on the side of the box for the #3881 5.8 truck kit. It doesn't show a graph or tell you if that's with a throttle body, etc. If I had to guess it's probably not much more than 10-15 ft/lb better than stock from 2-3k without other add-ons.


mike460: I was under the impression that the TFSR intake was a much larger volume runner intake than the gt40 lower, and wasn't suitable for use in a relatively stock truck 351. I know of guys that run that manifold on blown or stroked setups, in the Lightning community, but I'm surprised it works very well at all in a non-race/high rpm application with those freeway gears you got.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2010 | 09:21 AM
  #21  
mike460's Avatar
mike460
Elder User
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: atl
Originally Posted by monkei
mike460: I was under the impression that the TFSR intake was a much larger volume runner intake than the gt40 lower, and wasn't suitable for use in a relatively stock truck 351. I know of guys that run that manifold on blown or stroked setups, in the Lightning community, but I'm surprised it works very well at all in a non-race/high rpm application with those freeway gears you got.
It does work pretty good, but I also have a pretty decent sized Lunati cam (51025 - 224/232 degrees duration @ 0.050, .535/.544 lift), Edelbrock Performer RPM heads (60229 P/N IIRC), headers, MSD ignition, 30 lb/hr injectors, and the intake. It is a stock short block, but everything on top is good. If you are gonna stay stock-ish, I think your plan to go with a GT40 intake would be best.

I am looking forward to a gear swap though.....been collecting parts, all I have left is the install kit....
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Richiemech
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
9
Jun 22, 2017 07:20 PM
Scot
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
5
Mar 24, 2013 07:44 PM
twistedmetal
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
2
Jun 7, 2003 09:40 PM
Gates
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
3
Feb 16, 2002 01:31 AM
Gates
Performance & General Engine Building
1
Jan 20, 2002 04:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE