Notices

checking valve lash on a 5.0l

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 09:25 PM
  #1  
acertm's Avatar
acertm
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
checking valve lash on a 5.0l

I am assembling my motor after a having the block bored and a valve job done. Assembly is done to the rocker arms. I am using a Haynes manual for guidance, and am having trouble following the valve lash procedure.

The book says with #1 at compression TDC check lash on both #1 valves and #5 exhaust and #7 intake.

The #1 valves are closed and I can do the check, but #5 and 7 are open so the check cannot be done.

Do I have the cam and crank out of phase? or what am I missing?

Can some one with experience please help me, Thanks in advance
 
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 09:56 PM
  #2  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Assuming this is a late model motor the heads have pedistal mount rockers and there is no lash adjustment so there's no point measuring it. If you did have adjustable rockers the sequence followed depends upon the engine firing order, what is it on your motor?
 
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 10:28 PM
  #3  
acertm's Avatar
acertm
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Hi Paul, thanks for responding.
The decal under the hood says 1,3,7,2,6,5,4,8.

The haynes manual says to check lash after machine work, and lash can be compensated for with longer or shorter push rods.

I've read a lot of your post and trust your advice, does any of this make sence to you, thanks, Fred
 
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 10:51 PM
  #4  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Yes this makes sense, but the valve lash should not have changed unless the block or heads were decked, and you won't get accurate numbers unless the lifters are pumped full of oil.

For that firing order the measuring sequence is..

With piston #1 @ TDC, check #1 In/Ex, #4 In, #3 Ex, #8 In, #7 Ex.
With crank rotated 180 deg from above, check #3 In, #2 Ex, #7 In, #6 Ex
With crank rotated another 270 deg, check #2 In, #4 Ex, #5 In/Ex, #6 In, #8 Ex.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 12:13 AM
  #5  
acertm's Avatar
acertm
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Thanks Paul, This makes more sense to me, but I won't be able to see the engine until tomorrow now. Just to make sure I did things right, with the crank an cam installed (no heads yet) I brought #1 piston to the top of its travel, then intalled the timing set with cam gears dot at the bottom on verticle centerline and the crank gear dot at top on verticle cl. This should have set #1 piston at TDC compression stroke, right?

Fred
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 09:05 AM
  #6  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Yes that is right, the marks on both timing gears should point at one another.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #7  
acertm's Avatar
acertm
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Well at least I got the basics right. I still don't under stand the haynes or chilton procedure, oh well.
Thanks again , I'm back at it today.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 01:40 PM
  #8  
doug1222556's Avatar
doug1222556
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by acertm
I still don't under stand the haynes or chilton procedure, oh well.
Ford changed the firing order on the 302's. The book would be correct for the earlier firing order. That's why Paul asked which one you had.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 12:14 AM
  #9  
acertm's Avatar
acertm
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Hli Doug, well that eases my mind. It is kind of disconcerting to follow a procedure set out in a manual only to find it doesn't match the engine you're working on.

My Haynes manual covers Ford pu's 1980-96, do you know when the firing order was changed? What is the new order if you know it off hand? Thanks, Fred
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 07:45 AM
  #10  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
The firing order changed in 1994 when the truck motors got the F4TE roller cam, and the "new" order is the 5.0HO/351 version that is on the decal under the hood of your truck. That does not make your 5.0 a HO though. And don't sweat the discrepencies in the Haynes manual, all basic assembly and maintenance procedures are common regardless of the firing order.
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 11:45 PM
  #11  
acertm's Avatar
acertm
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Paul thanks again, I'm back on track now, but at work for 2wks so everything is on hold.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hayden01
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
11
Jul 26, 2016 03:18 PM
Lneidlinger
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Oct 1, 2015 05:39 AM
C-700
Y-Block V8 (239, 272, 292, 312, 317, 341, 368)
1
May 28, 2014 10:32 PM
richartdana44
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
9
Mar 31, 2010 11:10 PM
Dan Edick
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Aug 18, 2008 06:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE