Notices
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Bronco Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 06:53 PM
  #1  
FordManMT's Avatar
FordManMT
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: Rocky Mountians
Bronco Build

So I got a 1986 ford bronco through a trade so I lost a 97 ford tarus...lol

Anyways its a 1986 Bronco, 300ci inline 6, 4speed NP435 Tranny, 9in rear, dana 44 TTB in the front, stock, with 3.5:1 Gears.

The build; Now I want opinions on this, i will consider anything.

I was thinking about a dana 44 SAS in the front, 6" lift, and 37-38" tires. I want to put somthing like 4.56:1 gears front and rear. For the engine, bore'ed 0.030 over, offenhauser intake with holly 4 barrel, comp cam, headman headers ect.

Now what i need help with is what cam should i get and will a beefed up dana 44 with low gears hold up to 38" tires, this will primarly be a mudding, off roading vehical. I love the inline six so i would like to stick with that, I want max torque I dont care much for hp. Any feedback would be great.

-Dustin
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 09:38 PM
  #2  
greystreak92's Avatar
greystreak92
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,182
Likes: 12
From: Gateway to the West
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by FordManMT
I was thinking about a dana 44 SAS in the front, 6" lift, and 37-38" tires. Now what i need help with is what cam should i get and will a beefed up dana 44 with low gears hold up to 38" tires, this will primarily be a mudding, off roading vehicle.
-Dustin
Amen, to keeping the 300. Personally wouldn't trust that much unsprung weight under even a solid D44. Some will argue... and you might never have an issue but, mud running is typically high revving and a lot of wheel spinning. That is gonna spell early failure for u-joints and knuckles. If you don't mid replacing these parts, then it won't matter anyway. My $0.02
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 11:19 PM
  #3  
muscletruck7379's Avatar
muscletruck7379
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 4
From: Harrisburg, NE
Club FTE Silver Member

sounds like a nice trade! welcome to the forum as well!

i would honestly consider running even lower gears if its gonna be purely an off road vehicle. something a bit closer to the 5's
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 11:34 PM
  #4  
FordManMT's Avatar
FordManMT
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: Rocky Mountians
do you think 5.13:1's?

I would think the U-joints would hold up well with low diff gears, the powertrain ends up working less due to the torque factor, I know keeping the 3.50:1's is not an option.

Haha and thanks for the support on the 300. I have a EFI in my 1995 and it runs so nice, smooth power and all the torque I need for driving. But i figured a well built one would be nice in a big lifted 80's bronco, plus I still might get 10-15mpg
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2009 | 07:09 AM
  #5  
American Thunder's Avatar
American Thunder
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: Upstate New York
300s are amazing. If you send the head out for porting, it will make an enormous difference. The guys at fordsix have mentioned that 350hp is about the limit on a factory head casting with lots of porting work. But a 350hp 300 is no joke, that's a serious pulling motor.

p.s. A 300 won't require quite as much gearing as a 302 or 351 would. I take hills on back roads in my 300 Bronco in 5th gear at 40 mph. They're as close to a diesel as you can get without burning #2.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2009 | 04:14 PM
  #6  
FordManMT's Avatar
FordManMT
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: Rocky Mountians
350hp? Natrualy asperated or under boost?
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2009 | 06:26 PM
  #7  
muscletruck7379's Avatar
muscletruck7379
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 4
From: Harrisburg, NE
Club FTE Silver Member

if its not going on the road, i would go with 5.13's on a 38"+ tires.

if you balance the bottom end right you can rev a 300 to the moon.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2009 | 07:25 PM
  #8  
American Thunder's Avatar
American Thunder
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: Upstate New York
Originally Posted by FordManMT
350hp? Natrualy asperated or under boost?
N/A 350 hp.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Sep 27, 2009 | 07:27 PM
  #9  
American Thunder's Avatar
American Thunder
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: Upstate New York
Originally Posted by muscletruck7379
if its not going on the road, i would go with 5.13's on a 38"+ tires.

if you balance the bottom end right you can rev a 300 to the moon.
There's a guy revving his 300 to 7500 rpm. I think he goes 8s with it in the quartermile.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2009 | 08:52 PM
  #10  
FordManMT's Avatar
FordManMT
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: Rocky Mountians
I was thinking about taking the Industrial 300 I have and putting a turbo on it. I believe the industrial has thicker casting
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2009 | 10:32 AM
  #11  
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,285
Likes: 12
From: Bend,OR
i would for sure run 5.13's. remember it not just the size of tire but the weight that also account for power loss. personally speaking 36-37's would be max for a D44 unless you dump a bunch of cash and at that point you probably should move up to a D60. Check out Cage Offroad for there SAS install kits.

good luck with the build
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2009 | 09:48 PM
  #12  
FordManMT's Avatar
FordManMT
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: Rocky Mountians
Alright guys I have an update. I might not stick with the 300 plan anymore. I offered to buy my neighboors F250 this evening. He most likely will go through with the deal. Its a 1984 F250 4X4, with a 4speed NP435 tranny and 3/4 ton axles. Also it has a 460ci...

SOOO Im probibly going to buy the F250, and swap the powertrain into the bronco...What do you all think?
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2009 | 10:15 PM
  #13  
FordManMT's Avatar
FordManMT
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: Rocky Mountians
Pictures

Heres just a few



The new front end cost me $180 at the local junk yard, I thought it was a good deal




By the way thats not me in the picture haha
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 02:06 AM
  #14  
muscletruck7379's Avatar
muscletruck7379
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 4
From: Harrisburg, NE
Club FTE Silver Member

i got mine cheaper, ha ha ha ha ha ha....

sorry.

actually yours looks like it body is in much better shape than mine.- i have to replace all the sheet metal infront of the firewall

460 will sure turn it into a powerhouse, but i wouldn't worry about axles too much- the f250 would have TTB as well. you could however swap the engines and sell or drive the f250.

BTW, where in the rocky's are you?
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #15  
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,285
Likes: 12
From: Bend,OR
for reliability sake and some mpg savings stick with the 300-6. the 460 is gonna cause breakage on that 8.8 unless you drive nice.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 AM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE