Fuel Additives
Looking for any opinions or suggestions on the subject, as this is my first diesel. I am running bone stock right now, not sur eif that makes a difference on needs or wants?
Thanks, Tom
2001 SD SC, Cali truck
The process of removing sulfur from diesel reduces the lubricity of diesel fuel. This was true when they switched to LSD years ago, and is still true for the ULSD we have now. The EMA (Engine Manufacture's Association), the guys that build diesel motors got togehter and decided the minimum acceptable lubricating properties of fuel for the engines they build when the ULSD came into play. The EPA (bunch of idiots) also decided what the acceptable level of lubricity was for the engines that the EMA was building. Guess who's guidelines we're using?
Producing ULSD fuel results in improper lubricity levels. The EPA decided it knows more about what amount of lubricity is required than the folk that actually build the engines, so there is a lubricity additive already put in all the fuel you buy at the pump that is supposed to meet the EPA guidelines, even though these guidelines allow a higher wear scar rating than what the folks that build the engines originally asked for.
I have used either a fuel lubricity additive or run a biodiesel blend (which has better lubricity than any additive you can buy) since I took delivery of my truck with 19 miles on it. I never bothered to keep track of how much money I've spent on additives, but I can tell you I have over 304,000 miles on all 8 of my stock injectors with no loss in fuel economy.
My buddy Aklim should be along shortly to claim fuel additives are a complete waste of money without any cost/benefit study or other proof. Perhaps it would have been cheaper financially to save the additive money and just buy new injectors 100k miles ago or something, but I've always been more of a preventative type of guy when it comes to regular maintenance.
The process of removing sulfur from diesel reduces the lubricity of diesel fuel. This was true when they switched to LSD years ago, and is still true for the ULSD we have now. The EMA (Engine Manufacture's Association), the guys that build diesel motors got togehter and decided the minimum acceptable lubricating properties of fuel for the engines they build when the ULSD came into play. The EPA (bunch of idiots) also decided what the acceptable level of lubricity was for the engines that the EMA was building. Guess who's guidelines we're using?
Producing ULSD fuel results in improper lubricity levels. The EPA decided it knows more about what amount of lubricity is required than the folk that actually build the engines, so there is a lubricity additive already put in all the fuel you buy at the pump that is supposed to meet the EPA guidelines, even though these guidelines allow a higher wear scar rating than what the folks that build the engines originally asked for.
I have used either a fuel lubricity additive or run a biodiesel blend (which has better lubricity than any additive you can buy) since I took delivery of my truck with 19 miles on it. I never bothered to keep track of how much money I've spent on additives, but I can tell you I have over 304,000 miles on all 8 of my stock injectors with no loss in fuel economy.
My buddy Aklim should be along shortly to claim fuel additives are a complete waste of money without any cost/benefit study or other proof. Perhaps it would have been cheaper financially to save the additive money and just buy new injectors 100k miles ago or something, but I've always been more of a preventative type of guy when it comes to regular maintenance.
Trending Topics
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Now the whole thing about bio cleaning out your tank is hit and miss. It entirely depends upon the amount of build up in your tank to begin with. If you have a lot of build up, then yeah, it will get scrubbed out and wind up on your filter. I didn't have this problem, so my tank must have been pretty clean to begin with. I have been running B100 when I can, for over a year. I've peeked at the filter twice, with no build up.
With the B20, it will take longer to get the cleaning action on your tank.
I started running B20 around 155k miles. I never did plug a filter from the cleaning action, but I did end up changing it earlier than normal. I say fill up with a tank of it and see what you think. If you don't like it, you can always switch back. You won't do any damage by trying a tank.
) for less power and MPG. If/when they make it worth my while (like the do with E85, selling it for ~30c/gal less then 87 octane), I'll change my mind. But I REFUSE to pay more for less.








