Notices
All Things Towing Conventional, 5th Wheel, Toy Hauler, Flatbed, Gooseneck, Electrical/Brakes/etc.

SAE Tow Rating System

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 08:53 AM
  #1  
powerstroke72's Avatar
powerstroke72
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,308
Likes: 42
From: SW Virginia
SAE Tow Rating System

Just found this write-up on the SAE tow rating system that is being developed.

http://www.pickuptrucks.com/html/sto...ing/page1.html
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 12:22 PM
  #2  
senix's Avatar
senix
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 37,379
Likes: 1,862
From: Frederick, MD
Club FTE Gold Member
Was reading that as well. Will be very interesting to apply whatever formula they come up with and see if our current trucks are somewhere even close.

Another interesting item is those that were on the board. The Ford guy (don't quote me) indicated that they look at what the customer desires and is going to use the truck.

The others were not concerned about that.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #3  
87mh's Avatar
87mh
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 121
Likes: 1
From: In the Airstream
Post deleted - link not working
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2009 | 08:20 PM
  #4  
Mustang6147's Avatar
Mustang6147
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 1
Boy Toyaota, and Nissan are gonna be in trouble...

Those trucks there just scare the heck out of me...With the pop up camper rear leaf springs, and the No bigger then a bagle ring gears...
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 04:56 AM
  #5  
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
Fleet Owner
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 24,552
Likes: 74
From: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Club FTE Silver Member

Still not settled, Google SAE J2807

Maybe will have standards by 2012




John
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 09:00 AM
  #6  
grafekie's Avatar
grafekie
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 3
From: Simpsonville, KY
Hmm... "hopefully standards will be out mid-2008".... is it just me or is this article slightly dated?
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 07:42 PM
  #7  
87mh's Avatar
87mh
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 121
Likes: 1
From: In the Airstream
Hopefully a 2012 implementation

Here is the link I tried to post earlier:

www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/automobiles/30TOW.html

An update to the earlier article in "Pickuptrucks" magazine.

Still don't know if the link is working - here it is in it's entirety.

Motoring - Common Standard on Towing
CHRISTOPHER JENSEN
Published: August 28, 2009

FOR decades automakers have promoted the towing capacity of their vehicles, particularly pickup trucks, as a selling point. What many consumers did not know was that the industry had no standard to ensure apples-to-apples comparisons and to prevent companies from making unrealistic claims.

Mark Elias/Bloomberg News
Until now, automakers lacked a shared method to measure a vehicle’s towing capacity.
“I think in many ways consumers just went with what was printed in the brochure and took no real thought as to how it was developed,” said David Champion, the director of auto testing for Consumer Reports magazine.

That will soon change. SAE International, the group formerly known as the Society of Automotive Engineers, has established a voluntary standard that specifies how automakers should measure towing capacity.

“My personal opinion is that some of the numbers were getting a little carried away,” said Robert Krouse, a General Motors engineer specializing in towing who is also chairman of the SAE committee that came up with the standard. The committee included engineers from G.M., Chrysler, Ford, Honda and Toyota, as well as industry experts.

Mr. Krouse declined to say whether any automaker was doing anything unethical, but acknowledged that there had been potential for a company, if so inclined, “to turn the numbers” in its favor.

For example, without an industry standard, Mr. Krouse said, there was no requirement specifying how quickly a vehicle had to tow its load. “You could limp up any hill and say, ‘Well, we got to the top,’ Mr. Krouse said. “If you didn’t think your customers would complain, you could get away with anything.”

If automakers choose to use the SAE standard, consumers should come out ahead. “The good part is that the numbers should be more directly comparable, so a Toyota 10,000 pounds and a G.M. 10,000 pounds and a Ford 10,000 pounds should be pretty similar,” Mr. Krouse said.



The new standard, called J2807, specifies not just how quickly a vehicle must be able to accelerate — including uphill grades — but also how it stops and how it handles. With increases in horsepower and torque it is possible for a vehicle to tow a trailer that outweighs it, creating potential challenges to drivers, Mr. Krouse said.

“Being able to handle the trailer is an even more critical part of the equation,” he said. Consumers can quickly tell how a vehicle accelerates, but poor handling “sneaks up on you,” he said. “You can be in trouble in a hurry.”

So one requirement is that the vehicle’s suspension must be able to resist a trailer’s fishtailing.

One implication of the new standard is that towing numbers are likely to drop by 200 to 500 pounds. That is because the new standard specifies how the towing vehicle must be equipped when the tests are conducted.

Previously, the tested vehicle could be a stripped-down model without options, and only a driver needed to be on board. Now there must be a driver and a 150-pound passenger as well as typical options like air-conditioning.

That could increase the vehicle’s curb weight — and decrease the existing towing capability — by 200 to 500 pounds, Mr. Krouse said.

The standard was introduced at SAE International’s conference last year and is now undergoing some minor changes, Mr. Krouse said. It covers cars, minivans, S.U.V.’s and all but the largest heavy-duty pickups. The SAE committee originally recommended that automakers begin using the new standard for 2011 models, but Mr. Krouse said that given the tumult in the industry that could slip to 2012.

Nothing prevents an automaker from adopting the method earlier. But it could be a competitive disadvantage to be the only company using the system.

For consumers, the thing to look for would be a note on sales or promotional material stating that the tow rating was calculated using SAE standard J2807
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 11:17 PM
  #8  
Ford_Six's Avatar
Ford_Six
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 18,488
Likes: 22
From: The Big, Oregon
Club FTE Gold Member
It's funny, they make it sound like only the newest vehicles have the power to handle a load greater than their own weight. My 72 F250 weighs 4800lbs, but I have towed 9k with it. It's just a matter of not outdriving it or your skills.
No rating system in the world can make up for a lack of skill and common sense.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 05:15 AM
  #9  
glsurratt's Avatar
glsurratt
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 585
Likes: 4
Has anybody actually read this "standard"? I ask because I found this:

"The standard can be applied to passenger cars, multi-purpose passenger vehicles and trucks with a GCWR of up to 16,000 pounds."

That means the weight wars for 3/4 and 1 ton pickups will continue to be whatever the manufacturer wants since they are all rated well above 16,000 lbs and no truck maker is going to quote a standard that doesn't apply to their vehicle, especially if it means a lower number.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #10  
jake00's Avatar
jake00
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 13,589
Likes: 2
From: NW burbs of chicago
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by grafekie
Hmm... "hopefully standards will be out mid-2008".... is it just me or is this article slightly dated?

dated
11-10-07
 
Reply
Old May 28, 2013 | 08:37 PM
  #11  
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,463
Likes: 724
From: Calgary Canada
Hey, bumping an old thread, does anyone know if the advertised specs now meet this SAE standard?
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2013 | 04:59 AM
  #12  
senix's Avatar
senix
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 37,379
Likes: 1,862
From: Frederick, MD
Club FTE Gold Member
No they don't meet the J2807. Ford has said they will when the new Models come out. Therefore GM is waiting..so too for Ram.

Toyota is using them...they had to back off a bit on their numbers.
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2013 | 06:40 AM
  #13  
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,463
Likes: 724
From: Calgary Canada
Thanks for the quick response. So that's 2015 model year then? If things work the way I'm hoping, I'm about one year away from buying a new truck, or new to me anyway. Might be a 2013 model year bought in fall of 2014.
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2013 | 09:00 AM
  #14  
senix's Avatar
senix
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 37,379
Likes: 1,862
From: Frederick, MD
Club FTE Gold Member
I think so...watch pickuptrucks.com
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 11:09 AM
  #15  
montecarlo31's Avatar
montecarlo31
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by senix
No they don't meet the J2807. Ford has said they will when the new Models come out. Therefore GM is waiting..so too for Ram.

Toyota is using them...they had to back off a bit on their numbers.
Toyota is the only one using them and advertising it. GM release them for a while and all were within 200 lbs or so of the original ( think one went down 1,000 lbs but it was a regular cab 2wd or something???), some of GMs ratings even increased. I believe Dodge has said that they are testing their trucks to the SAE rating, again no facts like GM and Toyota. Ford is the only one who is not jumping up and down to use it. I'm guessing Ford can't get their trucks to get close to their current ratings which is why they are waiting it out. You will also notice Ford has toyed with brakes on the super duty line as well but been very quite about it. I pressed our Ford rep about them (not a lot lizard but an actual ford major accounts person) and he was not pleased that I called him out on the ratings and not being able to get close to what they are advertising now so I'm fairly confident that they are having issues with it.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE