Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

This is not good....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2009 | 10:48 PM
  #1  
makomaker's Avatar
makomaker
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: South LA
This is not good....

A Federal Appeals Court in Washington ruled that the Bush Admin did not do due diligence in studying enviromental impacts of oil and gas exploratory drilling on the outer continental shelf. They are basically shutting down a long term law allowing this exploratory drilling. The MMS (which issues lease permits, esp here off the Gulf Coast) has interpreted the ruling that all exploratory drilling cease under this law, which their legal counsel interpreted also.

In English: we're shut down baby. The Gulf of Mexico will not see any new leases for drilling until the Obama Admin reviews it.

Fortunately, we have lived in a bubble from the recession b/c we are a heavily dependant energy state. That bubble just burst. I would hate to speculate what this will do to pump prices, short or long term, but it cant be good.

BTW, three environmental activists brought the suit in AK worrying about global warming, polar bears and such.

This is not good...
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 10:59 PM
  #2  
Bigfwt04's Avatar
Bigfwt04
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Awesome! So we are more worried about the "impacts" of drilling than jobs and fuel. Very good thinking. Hmmm, what's next? Outlawing chainsaws and guns?
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 11:06 PM
  #3  
makomaker's Avatar
makomaker
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: South LA
Originally Posted by Bigfwt04
Awesome! So we are more worried about the "impacts" of drilling than jobs and fuel. Very good thinking. Hmmm, what's next? Outlawing chainsaws and guns?
What the drilling industry doesnt get credit for is the leaps of enviromental technology they imploy now. Its practically silly the minimal impact of drilling oil exploration has on the environment compared to just 10 yrs ago. Hell, they clean up oil spills now in hours and days, not weeks and mos.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 11:16 PM
  #4  
Bigfwt04's Avatar
Bigfwt04
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Problem is you are approaching it with common sense.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 10:12 AM
  #5  
superduty4x4's Avatar
superduty4x4
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,177
Likes: 40
From: Newport, WA
Originally Posted by Bigfwt04
Awesome! So we are more worried about the "impacts" of drilling than jobs and fuel. Very good thinking. Hmmm, what's next? Outlawing chainsaws and guns?
Shhh, don't give them any ideas!
Concerns in AK shutting down drilling in the SE? That's FUBAR.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 11:02 AM
  #6  
HKusp's Avatar
HKusp
Lead Driver
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,760
Likes: 27
From: Hampton, Maryland.
Club FTE Gold Member
See the words I have next to my supporter badge. Keep voting democrat and THIS is the stuff we will get. I'm not saying that the Republicans were much better, but hopefully the next time around, these guys/gals will get back to their conservative roots....
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 11:10 AM
  #7  
CampSpringsJohn's Avatar
CampSpringsJohn
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,069
Likes: 17
From: Melbourne, Ky
Gas just jumped 30 cents a gallon. I'm sure it's an attempt from Bush to make lots of money. Oh wait, he's not President. I guess it's Obamas turn to make money off the oil industry!
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #8  
HKusp's Avatar
HKusp
Lead Driver
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,760
Likes: 27
From: Hampton, Maryland.
Club FTE Gold Member
You know, it's always funny to me that people get all out of sorts about the profits that the Gas companies and their share holders get. They make anywhere from 3-9 cents a gallon profit, meanwhile, the government, who did absolutely nothing in the risk taking category with regards to investment and R&D and the like, and they make somewhere around 3 times the amount per gallon. People want to string up the gas company execs but do NOT want to hang our federal government....funny...or sad...both.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 6, 2009 | 11:39 AM
  #9  
CampSpringsJohn's Avatar
CampSpringsJohn
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,069
Likes: 17
From: Melbourne, Ky
Yeah, I know. I believe the rise in prices is the jump from winter fuel to summer fuel. It's re-formulated for emission standards. Yes, they do that with gas too, not just diesel. Got to keep the polar bear from drowning!
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 11:49 AM
  #10  
nlemerise's Avatar
nlemerise
Logistics Pro
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 16
From: AZ
From Hugh Hewitt:

There are indications that some in the media are finally figuring out that the environmental movement is very serious when it says it intends to use the federal Endangered Species Act and the listings of the polar bear and other species to force regulation of many "lower 48" operations, especially those in the energy business. This article covers a recent gathering of ESA experts wherein the path forward that environmental activists envision was discussed:
Under most traditional interpretations of the Endangered Species Act, an agency like the Bureau of Indian Affairs would have to determine how much of an impact a new coal-fired power plant in New Mexico or Colorado has on polar bears near the North Pole and penguins in Antarctica.

The vexing question is how to measure the site-specific impacts of such a project on a global scale. Top conservation leaders like Kieran Suckling, director of the Center for Biological Diversity, said the federal government is legally obligated to do just that.
The about-to-be-impacted industries have adopted a "hear no evil, see no evil" approach, and have refused the sort of preemptive litigation strategy that would have defined the outer limits of the ESA's reach via test cases on carbon-emitting activities in industries unrelated to direct energy-production. Had the oil-and-gas industry brought suit, for example, to oblige a small airport expansion to conduct a Section 7 consultation, it could have begun to build a defense against overreaching by the Act's most aggressive proponents.

Instead it has ceded the legal initiative to the very capable lawyers at the Center for Biological Diversity and other groups, and the rollout of the prevent-global-warming-via-the-ESA strategy is beginning. The impact on energy production across the U.S. will be to sharply curtail new exploration and production and to greatly increase the cost of existing production. Every time a federal permit is proposed that will facilitate energy production --or any carbon-releasing activity for that matter-- environmental activists will argue that an ESA mandated permitting process is required. This process, called a Section 7 consultation, is very time-consuming and mandates necessary "mitigations" that are imposed on the sought-after permit. Landowners have learned how to negotiate this regulatory maze in the past two decades, but the vast expansion of jurisdiction foreseen by the advocates of the polar bear and related listings will greatly increase the scope of the Act's reach and the workload on the Fish & Wildlife Service, not to mention the cost of each permit if a cost can even be calculated.

All of this fallout was easy to predict at the time the Bush Adminstration listed the polar bear last year, but the coverage of the controversy has resolutely refused to explain to the public the enormous price tag it will be paying for the use of ice coverage models in the listing process that were at best speculative and at worse wildly so.

TRANSLATED: You haven't seen anything yet. We all have to bend over, grab the ankles .....and enjoy it!
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 11:55 AM
  #11  
miller_feed's Avatar
miller_feed
Hook it, I'll pull it.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 15,037
Likes: 4
From: Grand Lake, La.
Club FTE Silver Member

If this happens Jay, I wonder what it will cost us to bail out Shell, Mobil, etc? lol. If this happens, all the rigs will move over seas and we will be more dependant on foreign oil.

I don't think they will stop drilling right now. The majors have enough leases right now to last for a while. If you mean that no new leases will be sold. I dealt with MMS in the business I was in and they are just another government branch, most of them are a-holes anyway.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 12:17 PM
  #12  
Tenn01PSD350's Avatar
Tenn01PSD350
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,892
Likes: 2
From: Middle Tennessee
Originally Posted by HKusp
You know, it's always funny to me that people get all out of sorts about the profits that the Gas companies and their share holders get. They make anywhere from 3-9 cents a gallon profit, meanwhile, the government, who did absolutely nothing in the risk taking category with regards to investment and R&D and the like, and they make somewhere around 3 times the amount per gallon. People want to string up the gas company execs but do NOT want to hang our federal government....funny...or sad...both.
I am not taking sides on this, just want to point out that the tax rate on fuel is much much higher in Europe. Not saying we have it good, just saying it could be worse. Probably headed that way.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 12:46 PM
  #13  
makomaker's Avatar
makomaker
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: South LA
Originally Posted by miller_feed
If this happens Jay, I wonder what it will cost us to bail out Shell, Mobil, etc? lol. If this happens, all the rigs will move over seas and we will be more dependant on foreign oil.

I don't think they will stop drilling right now. The majors have enough leases right now to last for a while. If you mean that no new leases will be sold. I dealt with MMS in the business I was in and they are just another government branch, most of them are a-holes anyway.
Your exactly right. But you know as well as I do, there's enuff oil on the outer rim JUST IN LA, to fuel us for a minute or two, it's proven, its out there, all we have to do is go get it! I think this is a shot right across our bow, and the next one we take right in the nose.

I wish Jindal would stand up to the country, tell 'em we're twisting the valve down about 50% and watch the ensuing panic up north. Better yet, do it in Nov right when their home heating oil business is picking up. Then people will wake the f%^$ up and say, hey, this stuff's pretty important.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #14  
makomaker's Avatar
makomaker
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: South LA
Originally Posted by nlemerise
From Hugh Hewitt:

There are indications that some in the media are finally figuring out that the environmental movement is very serious when it says it intends to use the federal Endangered Species Act and the listings of the polar bear and other species to force regulation of many "lower 48" operations, especially those in the energy business. This article covers a recent gathering of ESA experts wherein the path forward that environmental activists envision was discussed:
Under most traditional interpretations of the Endangered Species Act, an agency like the Bureau of Indian Affairs would have to determine how much of an impact a new coal-fired power plant in New Mexico or Colorado has on polar bears near the North Pole and penguins in Antarctica.

The vexing question is how to measure the site-specific impacts of such a project on a global scale. Top conservation leaders like Kieran Suckling, director of the Center for Biological Diversity, said the federal government is legally obligated to do just that.
The about-to-be-impacted industries have adopted a "hear no evil, see no evil" approach, and have refused the sort of preemptive litigation strategy that would have defined the outer limits of the ESA's reach via test cases on carbon-emitting activities in industries unrelated to direct energy-production. Had the oil-and-gas industry brought suit, for example, to oblige a small airport expansion to conduct a Section 7 consultation, it could have begun to build a defense against overreaching by the Act's most aggressive proponents.

Instead it has ceded the legal initiative to the very capable lawyers at the Center for Biological Diversity and other groups, and the rollout of the prevent-global-warming-via-the-ESA strategy is beginning. The impact on energy production across the U.S. will be to sharply curtail new exploration and production and to greatly increase the cost of existing production. Every time a federal permit is proposed that will facilitate energy production --or any carbon-releasing activity for that matter-- environmental activists will argue that an ESA mandated permitting process is required. This process, called a Section 7 consultation, is very time-consuming and mandates necessary "mitigations" that are imposed on the sought-after permit. Landowners have learned how to negotiate this regulatory maze in the past two decades, but the vast expansion of jurisdiction foreseen by the advocates of the polar bear and related listings will greatly increase the scope of the Act's reach and the workload on the Fish & Wildlife Service, not to mention the cost of each permit if a cost can even be calculated.

All of this fallout was easy to predict at the time the Bush Adminstration listed the polar bear last year, but the coverage of the controversy has resolutely refused to explain to the public the enormous price tag it will be paying for the use of ice coverage models in the listing process that were at best speculative and at worse wildly so.

TRANSLATED: You haven't seen anything yet. We all have to bend over, grab the ankles .....and enjoy it!
That's excellent Neal.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LittleRadio
Excursion - King of SUVs
69
May 14, 2011 11:29 PM
Charlie Bravo
General Automotive Discussion
58
Sep 18, 2009 04:26 PM
TAMU05
Texas Chapter
14
Nov 6, 2004 01:07 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE