1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

This is not good....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-05-2009, 10:48 PM
makomaker's Avatar
makomaker
makomaker is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South LA
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is not good....

A Federal Appeals Court in Washington ruled that the Bush Admin did not do due diligence in studying enviromental impacts of oil and gas exploratory drilling on the outer continental shelf. They are basically shutting down a long term law allowing this exploratory drilling. The MMS (which issues lease permits, esp here off the Gulf Coast) has interpreted the ruling that all exploratory drilling cease under this law, which their legal counsel interpreted also.

In English: we're shut down baby. The Gulf of Mexico will not see any new leases for drilling until the Obama Admin reviews it.

Fortunately, we have lived in a bubble from the recession b/c we are a heavily dependant energy state. That bubble just burst. I would hate to speculate what this will do to pump prices, short or long term, but it cant be good.

BTW, three environmental activists brought the suit in AK worrying about global warming, polar bears and such.

This is not good...
 
  #2  
Old 05-05-2009, 10:59 PM
Bigfwt04's Avatar
Bigfwt04
Bigfwt04 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awesome! So we are more worried about the "impacts" of drilling than jobs and fuel. Very good thinking. Hmmm, what's next? Outlawing chainsaws and guns?
 
  #3  
Old 05-05-2009, 11:06 PM
makomaker's Avatar
makomaker
makomaker is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South LA
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bigfwt04
Awesome! So we are more worried about the "impacts" of drilling than jobs and fuel. Very good thinking. Hmmm, what's next? Outlawing chainsaws and guns?
What the drilling industry doesnt get credit for is the leaps of enviromental technology they imploy now. Its practically silly the minimal impact of drilling oil exploration has on the environment compared to just 10 yrs ago. Hell, they clean up oil spills now in hours and days, not weeks and mos.
 
  #4  
Old 05-05-2009, 11:16 PM
Bigfwt04's Avatar
Bigfwt04
Bigfwt04 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Problem is you are approaching it with common sense.
 
  #5  
Old 05-06-2009, 10:12 AM
superduty4x4's Avatar
superduty4x4
superduty4x4 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newport, WA
Posts: 12,176
Received 39 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Bigfwt04
Awesome! So we are more worried about the "impacts" of drilling than jobs and fuel. Very good thinking. Hmmm, what's next? Outlawing chainsaws and guns?
Shhh, don't give them any ideas!
Concerns in AK shutting down drilling in the SE? That's FUBAR.
 
  #6  
Old 05-06-2009, 11:02 AM
HKusp's Avatar
HKusp
HKusp is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Perry Hall, Maryland.
Posts: 7,760
Received 26 Likes on 20 Posts
See the words I have next to my supporter badge. Keep voting democrat and THIS is the stuff we will get. I'm not saying that the Republicans were much better, but hopefully the next time around, these guys/gals will get back to their conservative roots....
 
  #7  
Old 05-06-2009, 11:10 AM
CampSpringsJohn's Avatar
CampSpringsJohn
CampSpringsJohn is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne, Ky
Posts: 14,067
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Gas just jumped 30 cents a gallon. I'm sure it's an attempt from Bush to make lots of money. Oh wait, he's not President. I guess it's Obamas turn to make money off the oil industry!
 
  #8  
Old 05-06-2009, 11:23 AM
HKusp's Avatar
HKusp
HKusp is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Perry Hall, Maryland.
Posts: 7,760
Received 26 Likes on 20 Posts
You know, it's always funny to me that people get all out of sorts about the profits that the Gas companies and their share holders get. They make anywhere from 3-9 cents a gallon profit, meanwhile, the government, who did absolutely nothing in the risk taking category with regards to investment and R&D and the like, and they make somewhere around 3 times the amount per gallon. People want to string up the gas company execs but do NOT want to hang our federal government....funny...or sad...both.
 
  #9  
Old 05-06-2009, 11:39 AM
CampSpringsJohn's Avatar
CampSpringsJohn
CampSpringsJohn is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne, Ky
Posts: 14,067
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Yeah, I know. I believe the rise in prices is the jump from winter fuel to summer fuel. It's re-formulated for emission standards. Yes, they do that with gas too, not just diesel. Got to keep the polar bear from drowning!
 
  #10  
Old 05-06-2009, 11:49 AM
nlemerise's Avatar
nlemerise
nlemerise is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
From Hugh Hewitt:

There are indications that some in the media are finally figuring out that the environmental movement is very serious when it says it intends to use the federal Endangered Species Act and the listings of the polar bear and other species to force regulation of many "lower 48" operations, especially those in the energy business. This article covers a recent gathering of ESA experts wherein the path forward that environmental activists envision was discussed:
Under most traditional interpretations of the Endangered Species Act, an agency like the Bureau of Indian Affairs would have to determine how much of an impact a new coal-fired power plant in New Mexico or Colorado has on polar bears near the North Pole and penguins in Antarctica.

The vexing question is how to measure the site-specific impacts of such a project on a global scale. Top conservation leaders like Kieran Suckling, director of the Center for Biological Diversity, said the federal government is legally obligated to do just that.
The about-to-be-impacted industries have adopted a "hear no evil, see no evil" approach, and have refused the sort of preemptive litigation strategy that would have defined the outer limits of the ESA's reach via test cases on carbon-emitting activities in industries unrelated to direct energy-production. Had the oil-and-gas industry brought suit, for example, to oblige a small airport expansion to conduct a Section 7 consultation, it could have begun to build a defense against overreaching by the Act's most aggressive proponents.

Instead it has ceded the legal initiative to the very capable lawyers at the Center for Biological Diversity and other groups, and the rollout of the prevent-global-warming-via-the-ESA strategy is beginning. The impact on energy production across the U.S. will be to sharply curtail new exploration and production and to greatly increase the cost of existing production. Every time a federal permit is proposed that will facilitate energy production --or any carbon-releasing activity for that matter-- environmental activists will argue that an ESA mandated permitting process is required. This process, called a Section 7 consultation, is very time-consuming and mandates necessary "mitigations" that are imposed on the sought-after permit. Landowners have learned how to negotiate this regulatory maze in the past two decades, but the vast expansion of jurisdiction foreseen by the advocates of the polar bear and related listings will greatly increase the scope of the Act's reach and the workload on the Fish & Wildlife Service, not to mention the cost of each permit if a cost can even be calculated.

All of this fallout was easy to predict at the time the Bush Adminstration listed the polar bear last year, but the coverage of the controversy has resolutely refused to explain to the public the enormous price tag it will be paying for the use of ice coverage models in the listing process that were at best speculative and at worse wildly so.

TRANSLATED: You haven't seen anything yet. We all have to bend over, grab the ankles .....and enjoy it!
 
  #11  
Old 05-06-2009, 11:55 AM
miller_feed's Avatar
miller_feed
miller_feed is offline
Hook it, I'll pull it.

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Grand Lake, La.
Posts: 15,037
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If this happens Jay, I wonder what it will cost us to bail out Shell, Mobil, etc? lol. If this happens, all the rigs will move over seas and we will be more dependant on foreign oil.

I don't think they will stop drilling right now. The majors have enough leases right now to last for a while. If you mean that no new leases will be sold. I dealt with MMS in the business I was in and they are just another government branch, most of them are a-holes anyway.
 
  #12  
Old 05-06-2009, 12:17 PM
Tenn01PSD350's Avatar
Tenn01PSD350
Tenn01PSD350 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 11,892
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HKusp
You know, it's always funny to me that people get all out of sorts about the profits that the Gas companies and their share holders get. They make anywhere from 3-9 cents a gallon profit, meanwhile, the government, who did absolutely nothing in the risk taking category with regards to investment and R&D and the like, and they make somewhere around 3 times the amount per gallon. People want to string up the gas company execs but do NOT want to hang our federal government....funny...or sad...both.
I am not taking sides on this, just want to point out that the tax rate on fuel is much much higher in Europe. Not saying we have it good, just saying it could be worse. Probably headed that way.
 
  #13  
Old 05-06-2009, 12:46 PM
makomaker's Avatar
makomaker
makomaker is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South LA
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by miller_feed
If this happens Jay, I wonder what it will cost us to bail out Shell, Mobil, etc? lol. If this happens, all the rigs will move over seas and we will be more dependant on foreign oil.

I don't think they will stop drilling right now. The majors have enough leases right now to last for a while. If you mean that no new leases will be sold. I dealt with MMS in the business I was in and they are just another government branch, most of them are a-holes anyway.
Your exactly right. But you know as well as I do, there's enuff oil on the outer rim JUST IN LA, to fuel us for a minute or two, it's proven, its out there, all we have to do is go get it! I think this is a shot right across our bow, and the next one we take right in the nose.

I wish Jindal would stand up to the country, tell 'em we're twisting the valve down about 50% and watch the ensuing panic up north. Better yet, do it in Nov right when their home heating oil business is picking up. Then people will wake the f%^$ up and say, hey, this stuff's pretty important.
 
  #14  
Old 05-06-2009, 01:01 PM
makomaker's Avatar
makomaker
makomaker is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South LA
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nlemerise
From Hugh Hewitt:

There are indications that some in the media are finally figuring out that the environmental movement is very serious when it says it intends to use the federal Endangered Species Act and the listings of the polar bear and other species to force regulation of many "lower 48" operations, especially those in the energy business. This article covers a recent gathering of ESA experts wherein the path forward that environmental activists envision was discussed:
Under most traditional interpretations of the Endangered Species Act, an agency like the Bureau of Indian Affairs would have to determine how much of an impact a new coal-fired power plant in New Mexico or Colorado has on polar bears near the North Pole and penguins in Antarctica.

The vexing question is how to measure the site-specific impacts of such a project on a global scale. Top conservation leaders like Kieran Suckling, director of the Center for Biological Diversity, said the federal government is legally obligated to do just that.
The about-to-be-impacted industries have adopted a "hear no evil, see no evil" approach, and have refused the sort of preemptive litigation strategy that would have defined the outer limits of the ESA's reach via test cases on carbon-emitting activities in industries unrelated to direct energy-production. Had the oil-and-gas industry brought suit, for example, to oblige a small airport expansion to conduct a Section 7 consultation, it could have begun to build a defense against overreaching by the Act's most aggressive proponents.

Instead it has ceded the legal initiative to the very capable lawyers at the Center for Biological Diversity and other groups, and the rollout of the prevent-global-warming-via-the-ESA strategy is beginning. The impact on energy production across the U.S. will be to sharply curtail new exploration and production and to greatly increase the cost of existing production. Every time a federal permit is proposed that will facilitate energy production --or any carbon-releasing activity for that matter-- environmental activists will argue that an ESA mandated permitting process is required. This process, called a Section 7 consultation, is very time-consuming and mandates necessary "mitigations" that are imposed on the sought-after permit. Landowners have learned how to negotiate this regulatory maze in the past two decades, but the vast expansion of jurisdiction foreseen by the advocates of the polar bear and related listings will greatly increase the scope of the Act's reach and the workload on the Fish & Wildlife Service, not to mention the cost of each permit if a cost can even be calculated.

All of this fallout was easy to predict at the time the Bush Adminstration listed the polar bear last year, but the coverage of the controversy has resolutely refused to explain to the public the enormous price tag it will be paying for the use of ice coverage models in the listing process that were at best speculative and at worse wildly so.

TRANSLATED: You haven't seen anything yet. We all have to bend over, grab the ankles .....and enjoy it!
That's excellent Neal.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LittleRadio
Excursion - King of SUVs
69
05-14-2011 11:29 PM
Charlie Bravo
General Automotive Discussion
58
09-18-2009 04:26 PM
TAMU05
Texas Chapter
14
11-06-2004 01:07 PM



Quick Reply: This is not good....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.