Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

CCV mod final decision

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 11:59 AM
  #16  
Izzy351's Avatar
Izzy351
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,541
Likes: 2
From: Dallas-Ft. Worth
Nice kit, Dave!
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #17  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 250
From: Hartford, WI
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Pocket
If you vent to atmosphere, you'll have no problem venting straight down behind the engine or routing the hose over the master cylinder. I've had my CCV mod for 4 years now, and it's always been routed over the master cylinder. No oil pools up in the CCV hose, it simply drains back into the valve cover.
I saw the CCV mod as the way that International does it per their parts manual. Just a straight pipe to the back of the VC and down the block.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 07:28 PM
  #18  
ernesteugene's Avatar
ernesteugene
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
From: Fulltime RVer
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by dave at BD Power
...a kit that does not vent to atmosphere, comes with a filter and a bypass that opens at 1 PSI and looks like a factory install...
This statement "seems" to imply that your kit allows the crankcase pressure to increase to 1 psi=27.68" H2O before a "bypass" opens to limit any further increase in crankcase pressure???

A 1 psi crankcase pressure is what I measured in trucks that had their CCV hose routed to their tailpipe and that's far too high a pressure for the crankcase. Under WOT full load the crankcase pressure of a healthy engine with the CCV vented directly to the atmosphere shouldn't exceed 4" H2O=0.145 psi and the OEM Ford design provides a 2" H2O to 6" H2O vacuum in the crankcase depending on engine load where the higher vacuum occurs at higher loads where it's needed to vent the increased blow by.

Here's some pictures of how I instrumented my old F350 to measure the crankcase pressure so I could keep tabs on the CCV hose and on the blow by in general especially when towing long steep grades at WOT. Basically you install a fitting for a 1/4" ID plastic hose on the oil filler neck and run the hose to a 10" H2O gauge in the cockpit. In the picture below the gauge on the left which reads from 0" to 10" H2O...



...was connected to the hose going to the oil filler tube in this picture...



With my CCV design I had a crankcase pressure of 0.7" H20 at idle and 3.0" H20 at WOT full load which indicates that my rings were sealing well. A new engine exhibits about a x4 increase in crankcase pressure from idle to WOT full load.

Using a gauge with a 10" H2O scale allows for some needle bounce which you'll get under some load conditions and for increased readings due to engine wear. An older engine nearing the end of its service life exhibits higher crankcase pressures at all throttle positions and about a x8 increase in crankcase pressure from idle to WOT full load.

A crankcase pressure gauge is a good way of monitoring the general health status of your engine and I especially recommend it for anyone who's attempting to improve on Ford's vacuum regulator design by routing a catch canister back into the intake as well as for anyone running their CCV hose through a catch canister that vents to the atmosphere. Here is a link to where I bought of the 10" H2O gauge shown in the picture...

Phone (609) 259-8900 Fax (609) 259-3575 Internet:McMaster-Carr

E-mail:nj.sales@mcmaster.com

Each 4026K251 Low-Pressure Diaphragm Gauge 1.5% Accuracy, 1/4" NPT Center Back, 0-10" of H2O (Same as 4026K5) $49.65 $49.65 Monday morning
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #19  
PeterAL's Avatar
PeterAL
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by ernesteugene
A 1 psi crankcase pressure is what I measured in trucks that had their CCV hose routed to their tailpipe and that's far too high a pressure for the crankcase.

Hmmm, do I understand you correctly that with a CCV hose routed to the tailpipe, but NOT into the tailpipe, you got that high a cankcase pressure?

That would be an open hose running from front to back end, and exiting somewhere near the end of the exhaust pipe. Or are you referring to those systems that have the hose connected to a fitting that dumps INTO the exhaust pipe?

Thanks for your detailed replies on this issue.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 08:14 PM
  #20  
shark1979's Avatar
shark1979
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: eastern shore,MD
now i am confused should you do the ccv mod or not? for the reason if you do the ccv mod you will not have a negtive pressure in the crankcase. do you wnat a negtive or not???? to many choices
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #21  
PeterAL's Avatar
PeterAL
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by shark1979
now i am confused should you do the ccv mod or not? for the reason if you do the ccv mod you will not have a negtive pressure in the crankcase. do you wnat a negtive or not???? to many choices
Exactly shark.. that's why I started this thread..

There seems to me to be a couple of conflicting opinions...

1. Route the hose over the brake controller, or directly down.

2. Use a filter/trap or not.

And, there doesn't seem to be consensus.

I don't want a lot of stinky smoke and I don't want to continue to pollute my engine. And of course, I don;t want to harm my engine.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 08:23 PM
  #22  
shark1979's Avatar
shark1979
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: eastern shore,MD
i got all the stuff to do but not sure that i should now. cause i understand point of the negtive pressure in the crankcase. but also understand why i dont want all the oil resdue air going through my turbo and intercooler. NEED HELP!!
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 08:54 PM
  #23  
Fat Diesel's Avatar
Fat Diesel
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,884
Likes: 180
From: Morgan Hill, CA
Club FTE Silver Member

He's talking about hooking it directly into the exhaust stream, like I did over a 125,000 miles ago. Apparently my engine is more durable than most since it's still fine after all these high pressure miles and years. I take my truck past 3000 rpm at WOT every day of it's life and it's still a champ. I've got plenty of blow-by, probably more than most, and despite all these pressures building and building in my crankcase I still haven't blown a gasket or even popped the dipstick out of the tube! I've got nearly 250,000 miles on it and when the day comes to put a new engine in, it will get the same CCV system!

But seriously folks, there is clearly not a consensus on whether it is bad to hook it to your exhaust. I'm just showing you that there are trucks out there with it run to the exhaust without having any problems at all.

Here's a pic that shows how I did it...



 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-4

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 10:41 PM
  #24  
JockD's Avatar
JockD
Laughing Gas
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 823
Likes: 5
From: Dallas, Oregon
Andy, you have a 4" exhaust. It looks like the CCV enters the exhaust just ahead of the rear axle. Is that a muffler or resonator just upstream of the entry point? The restriction of a muffler may make a big difference in the pressure in the exhaust stream. It looks like your CCV enters the exhaust at nearly a 90* angle. Is that correct?
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 09:39 AM
  #25  
superduty4x4's Avatar
superduty4x4
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,177
Likes: 40
From: Newport, WA
Originally Posted by shark1979
now i am confused should you do the ccv mod or not? for the reason if you do the ccv mod you will not have a negtive pressure in the crankcase. do you wnat a negtive or not???? to many choices
Do the CCV mod, if nothing else it keeps the oil out of your intercooler and all over your engine/CAC pipes. How you do it is totally up to you... tons of options as you already know.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 11:12 AM
  #26  
Fat Diesel's Avatar
Fat Diesel
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,884
Likes: 180
From: Morgan Hill, CA
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by JockD
Andy, you have a 4" exhaust. It looks like the CCV enters the exhaust just ahead of the rear axle. Is that a muffler or resonator just upstream of the entry point? The restriction of a muffler may make a big difference in the pressure in the exhaust stream. It looks like your CCV enters the exhaust at nearly a 90* angle. Is that correct?
That is a muffler. It's a BD one from about 8 years ago or so. You can see through it, there's a propeller shaped baffle of some sort in there. The connection point is just before the axle. I think it's closer to 45* than 90* though. I just mounted it that way to make it easier to run the hose! Gene, I know you cringe when you read this stuff!

Someday I'll pull the valve cover and we'll see if all that corrosive gas is just eating my engine away from the doghouse down. Based on my very own extensive bar stool analysis, if it really is very corrosive it would chew it's way through the IC in the OEM configuration.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 03:26 PM
  #27  
ernesteugene's Avatar
ernesteugene
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
From: Fulltime RVer
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by PeterAL
...There seems to me to be a couple of conflicting opinions...

1. Route the hose over the brake controller, or directly down.

2. Use a filter/trap or not.

I don't want a lot of stinky smoke and I don't want to continue to pollute my engine. And of course, I don;t want to harm my engine...
1. Thanks to "gravity" when you run the CCV hose up and over the master cylinder the oil vapor which condenses in that run of CCV hose drains back into the doghouse and when the engine is running this helps to reduce the amount of "stinky" oil vapor coming out of the end of your CCV hose and after you park it reduces the oil drips in your driveway.

However if you use this approach the entire time your engine is running some oil vapor is continuously condensing and draining back into the doghouse and for the reasons I've already stated I'd rather put up with more vapor and more drips from my CCV hose than to let that "nasty acidic condensation" continuously drain back into my engine!

The OEM Ford design doesn't allow condensed oil vapor to drain back into the engine because the Ford design is continuously sucking it out, however it's then depositing it in the intake to the turbo which leads to a different set of issues such as blown CAC boots and oil accumulation in the intercooler.

2. Those who employ a "filter/trap" usually run the CCV hose up and over the master cylinder and then down to a "filter/trap" that's near the warmth of the engine and then out to the rear of the truck and this configuration dramatically reduces the stink but does so at the expense of increasing crankcase pressure.

When it comes to the CCV mod there's no free lunch and stinky fumes and a dripping CCV hose are what you need to accept if you want to minimize your crankcase pressure when your engine is under a maximum load and producing its maximum amount of blow by.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 04:38 PM
  #28  
smoky_diesel's Avatar
smoky_diesel
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 535
From: Chandler, AZ
Originally Posted by ernesteugene
When it comes to the CCV mod there's no free lunch and stinky fumes and a dripping CCV hose are what you need to accept if you want to minimize your crankcase pressure...
I'd rather clean the boots once a year that fill my cab with stinky smoke. I put mine back to stock. didn't see any performance gain.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 04:42 PM
  #29  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 250
From: Hartford, WI
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by smoky_diesel
I'd rather clean the boots once a year that fill my cab with stinky smoke. I put mine back to stock. didn't see any performance gain.
But you might see a performance loss if the boots slip out.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 04:49 PM
  #30  
ernesteugene's Avatar
ernesteugene
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
From: Fulltime RVer
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Fat Diesel
...But seriously folks, there is clearly not a consensus on whether it is bad to hook it to your exhaust...
Originally Posted by Pocket
...Ernest knows all too well that I haven't always agreed with him in the past, but in this case, I do agree that the CCV in the exhaust doesn't work. Every person that has tested the way he is suggesting has always ended up with additional pressure in the crankcase when the CCV is routed into the exhaust...
CCV into exhaust.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/7...o-exhaust.html

Originally Posted by bfife
Don't do it!! I did and now I don't. I argued with Eugene repeatedly about this. (Damn engineers think they know everything LOL) I used a check valve and a venturi tube, did everything right. I have been fighting a valve cover oil leak for almost a year, resealed twice, new gasket, proper torque, locktight, you name it I tried it. Finally I diconnected the CCV mod from the exhuast and the leak stopped. Just save yourself the hassle. Don't install the Mod into the exhaust. Barney
Originally Posted by Izzy351
Gene proved that it *does* happen by measuring *POSITIVE* CC pressure at the oil cap on several trucks. It's not a theory, it's been proven. I was going to do it as well, but not after seeing that discussion. IIRC, it *can* work with a gasser because the exhaust pulses are undisturbed as they traverse the exhaust pipe. After pushing through a turbo, they're no longer distinct pulses -- just high pressure flow that wants to push back up the "venturi" that really isn't.
Originally Posted by jtharvey
I have also tested a positive pressure from the actual tube in the exhaust, not just the oil filler cap. I hooked up Gene's gauge directly to the tube I had running into the exhaust. When I saw positive pressure, the CCV never went back into the exhaust.
Originally Posted by miller_feed
Gene has proof that putting the CCV to the exhaust will cause back psi and will start blowing seals. I don't know for sure about this because I have not done the CCV mod.
CCV mod into exhaust?
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/7...o-exhaust.html
Originally Posted by jtharvey
A number of us have tried it, including me, but have since removed it. I put a pressure gauge on the tube that I had running into the exhaust, like you described it with the bung in the direction of the flow, and it actually was not providing a suction, but giving pressure. If hooked up to the CCV, this would pressurize your crankcase, which is a bad thing. The general concensus is to stay with a free flowing tube that just vents to the atmosphere.
Originally Posted by Izzy351
If you put a pressure gauge on your oil cap & measure a lot of pressure with it hooked up, and not as much with it vented, I'd consider that "seeing for yourself". I didn't have to -- I took the good word of Gene and several of the others that had theirs measured. Extra pressure in your CC is a bad, BAD thing...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE