Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Does a boosted to manual brake conversion kit exist ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 10:38 PM
  #1  
Graeme's Avatar
Graeme
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Does a boosted to manual brake conversion kit exist ?

hey guys, im jsut wondering if any of you have converted your breaks to manual, im wondering if theres a conversion kit you can get or something, i think my booster is toast
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 10:44 PM
  #2  
kshaneh's Avatar
kshaneh
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Rising Sun, IN
its not that hard to change 1 out all it is is 4 bolts i think
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:01 PM
  #3  
fmc400's Avatar
fmc400
MSEE
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,386
Likes: 35
From: Austin, TX
Club FTE Gold Member
It would be a lot more work than changing your booster. A booster is only around $100 after you turn in your core; you just have to make sure you get the right kind. Are you sure the booster is bad? How do you know; what have you done to verify? I ask because they rarely fail and are often blamed for problems they didn't cause.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:06 PM
  #4  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 60
Club FTE Silver Member

Replace the master cylinder with a manual version and make sure you get the pedal pushrod.

Just make sure you match the disk/ drum versions of the M/C

Bleed the brakes and you're done.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:47 PM
  #5  
fmc400's Avatar
fmc400
MSEE
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,386
Likes: 35
From: Austin, TX
Club FTE Gold Member
Do you know if the original lines that run from the proportioning valve to the M\C could be retained between the two setups - or would new lines have to be bent? Doesn't the M\C for power brakes stick out a lot farther from the firewall than manual brakes, or is this not the case? That's why I ask about the lines.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:48 PM
  #6  
kshaneh's Avatar
kshaneh
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Rising Sun, IN
they might have to be bent cause w/o p.b. its shorter isnt it?
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 09:10 AM
  #7  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 60
Club FTE Silver Member

When I switched from power to manual all I did was take out the old m/c, and booster with brackets.

Bolted up the manual m/c with NEW lines from the m/c to the valve. Bled the system and it's off to the streets!

The old lines will be waaaaaaaay too short for the new set-up.

I also used a manual m/c from an 85-87 Ford Ranger. The older version is aluminum and newer version is the newer style with the plastic resevoir. Either will work and it looks trick.

Josh
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 11:40 AM
  #8  
fmc400's Avatar
fmc400
MSEE
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,386
Likes: 35
From: Austin, TX
Club FTE Gold Member
Cool, thanks for that information.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 04:09 PM
  #9  
81-F-150-Explorer's Avatar
81-F-150-Explorer
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,786
Likes: 28
From: Northern California
Just a heads up Comment.

It's illegal to Downgrade a brake system.

IE: Convert Power Brakes to Manual, or swap Disc Brakes For Drums, or ABS for non ABS.

Source: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety standards #105 and FMVSS #106.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #10  
Pickupmanx2's Avatar
Pickupmanx2
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,654
Likes: 979
From: Near Yosemite CA
Well MAYBE it had manual brakes before? Who's to say
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #11  
snowman79's Avatar
snowman79
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Channahon, IL
Would you have to change the pedal assembly? I thought there are different pedal ratios between a manual and power setup.

When you removed the booster and bracket then what do you bolt the manual mc to? I am assuming you would need to find a bracket from a truck with a manual mc.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 09:17 PM
  #12  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 60
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by 81-F-150-Explorer
Just a heads up Comment.

It's illegal to Downgrade a brake system.

IE: Convert Power Brakes to Manual, or swap Disc Brakes For Drums, or ABS for non ABS.

Source: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety standards #105 and FMVSS #106.
Standard No. 105 - Hydraulic and Electric Brake Systems - Passenger Cars (Effective 1-1-68)

This standard specifies requirements for vehicles equipped with hydraulic and electric service brake systems and associated parking brake systems to ensure safe braking performance under normal conditions and emergency conditions.

Passenger Cars (Effective 1-1-76), School Buses (Effective 4-1-77) Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles, Trucks and Buses (Effective 9-1-83) Vehicles with Electric Brake Systems (Effective 10-20-97)
All braking effectiveness tests measure stopping distance.

Passenger Cars (Effective 3-6-95 until 9-1-2000), Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles, Trucks and Buses
(Effective 12-1-97 until 9-1-2002)
Manufacturers of passenger cars and multipurpose passenger vehicles (MPVs), trucks and buses with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) less than or equal to 3,500 kg (7,716 lbs.) may certify compliance with either FMVSS No. 105 or FMVSS No. 135 described later in this booklet. After the terminal dates shown above, FMVSS No. 105 continues to apply to MPVs, Trucks and Buses with a GVWR greater than 3,500 kg (7,716 lbs.).
Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles, Trucks and Buses (Effective 3-1-99) Multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks and buses with a GVWR greater than 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs.) must be equipped with an antilock brake system and meet additional stopping distance requirements.

Standard No. 106 - Brake Hoses - Passenger Cars, Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles, Trucks, Buses, Trailers, and Motorcycles, and Hydraulic, Air, and Vacuum Brake Hose, Brake Hose Assemblies, and Brake Hose End Fittings for use in those vehicles (Effective 1-1-68)
This standard establishes performance and labeling requirements for hydraulic, air, and vacuum brake hoses, brake hose assemblies, and brake hose fittings for all motor vehicles. The purpose of this standard is to reduce brake system failure from pressure or vacuum loss due to hose or hose assembly rupture.


Has nothing to do with either a manually operated or vacuum assisted vehicle brakes unless the vehicle was manufactured after 1995 in that case it must still have an ABS system.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 09:19 PM
  #13  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 60
Club FTE Silver Member

To add to that it is illegal for an OTR truck or trailer to "downgrade" from automatic slack adjusters to manual adjusters if the truck or trailer was originally equipped with automatic adjusters.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 11:12 PM
  #14  
Graeme's Avatar
Graeme
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
perhaps thats the law in the states but i live in BC Canada so i think its ok, and im not dead sure but wee did bleed the lines 5 pumps bleed, 5 pumps bleed, and still its taking a good 3 pumps on the pedal to get some good stopping power, is there a way to tell where air might be getting in if thats the case? i know its easy to switch out a booster but my freind recomended switching to manual and i am considering it, id never have to worru about a bad booster again heh. ive searched google n stuff but havent come up with anything. thanks for the info though fellas! now if only i could figure out where the power to the fuel level sender is cut off... i hate not knowing how much gas ive got.

1977 F250 fire engine red highboy
351m 35" m/t
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 05:23 PM
  #15  
81-F-150-Explorer's Avatar
81-F-150-Explorer
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,786
Likes: 28
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by Bullitt390
Standard No. 105 - Hydraulic and Electric Brake Systems - Passenger Cars (Effective 1-1-68)

This standard specifies requirements for vehicles equipped with hydraulic and electric service brake systems and associated parking brake systems to ensure safe braking performance under normal conditions and emergency conditions.

Passenger Cars (Effective 1-1-76), School Buses (Effective 4-1-77) Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles, Trucks and Buses (Effective 9-1-83) Vehicles with Electric Brake Systems (Effective 10-20-97)
All braking effectiveness tests measure stopping distance.

Passenger Cars (Effective 3-6-95 until 9-1-2000), Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles, Trucks and Buses
(Effective 12-1-97 until 9-1-2002)
Manufacturers of passenger cars and multipurpose passenger vehicles (MPVs), trucks and buses with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) less than or equal to 3,500 kg (7,716 lbs.) may certify compliance with either FMVSS No. 105 or FMVSS No. 135 described later in this booklet. After the terminal dates shown above, FMVSS No. 105 continues to apply to MPVs, Trucks and Buses with a GVWR greater than 3,500 kg (7,716 lbs.).
Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles, Trucks and Buses (Effective 3-1-99) Multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks and buses with a GVWR greater than 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs.) must be equipped with an antilock brake system and meet additional stopping distance requirements.

Standard No. 106 - Brake Hoses - Passenger Cars, Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles, Trucks, Buses, Trailers, and Motorcycles, and Hydraulic, Air, and Vacuum Brake Hose, Brake Hose Assemblies, and Brake Hose End Fittings for use in those vehicles (Effective 1-1-68)
This standard establishes performance and labeling requirements for hydraulic, air, and vacuum brake hoses, brake hose assemblies, and brake hose fittings for all motor vehicles. The purpose of this standard is to reduce brake system failure from pressure or vacuum loss due to hose or hose assembly rupture.


Has nothing to do with either a manually operated or vacuum assisted vehicle brakes unless the vehicle was manufactured after 1995 in that case it must still have an ABS system.
It has everything to do with a manually operated or vacuum assisted vehicle brakes, Disc and Drum Brakes etc... and has since 1968.

You need to read the whole of FMVSS 105 and 106. Not just a layman summery.

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations:

If you are still in doubt that downgrading safety equipment is illegal, I suggest you ask a lawyer. Also Your insurance company does not have to pay any damages if you get in a wreck, your fault or not, if the safety equipment, Which includes brakes, windshields, taillamps etc... etc... is downgraded or modified in such a way as not to be compliant to the appropriate FMVSS.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE