Potential of Ford's 2010 turbo 4.2 V6
#1
Potential of Ford's 2010 turbo 4.2 V6
I know there has already been some talk on this engine, but I've been thinking about it's potential and ability to work hard with a turbo.
I think Ford's new (in 2010) 4.2 liter V6 (Turbo ?) is supposed to put out around 340 hp or so and 370 ft. lbs. of torque or so...but get's better mileage than the V8's. This will be a very interesting development.
I don't know if Ford also plans to put displacement on demand for thie 4.2 V6...but that would be great.
3 cylinders when puttering around...6 turbo'd cylinders for blowing the doors off chevies.
I'm still wondering if the turbo'd V6 would be able to keep cool and unstressed.. under load ....running hard and long at the high rpm end say towing a heavy trailer in the Rockies ?
I don't know if Ford has designed it for this, but I understand it's supposed to be an alternative to a healthy V8...so I think some will use it this way, just as they would a non aspirated V8. I wonder if a highly stressed (turbo) engine can handle this kind of loading....day after day with reliability and durability ?
Personally, I think it can...truck engineers I would imagine would design it for this kind of hard work.
Also, what are your thoughts on this engine....is this the future....why...if not...why not ?
I think Ford's new (in 2010) 4.2 liter V6 (Turbo ?) is supposed to put out around 340 hp or so and 370 ft. lbs. of torque or so...but get's better mileage than the V8's. This will be a very interesting development.
I don't know if Ford also plans to put displacement on demand for thie 4.2 V6...but that would be great.
3 cylinders when puttering around...6 turbo'd cylinders for blowing the doors off chevies.
I'm still wondering if the turbo'd V6 would be able to keep cool and unstressed.. under load ....running hard and long at the high rpm end say towing a heavy trailer in the Rockies ?
I don't know if Ford has designed it for this, but I understand it's supposed to be an alternative to a healthy V8...so I think some will use it this way, just as they would a non aspirated V8. I wonder if a highly stressed (turbo) engine can handle this kind of loading....day after day with reliability and durability ?
Personally, I think it can...truck engineers I would imagine would design it for this kind of hard work.
Also, what are your thoughts on this engine....is this the future....why...if not...why not ?
#3
#5
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,943
Received 1,384 Likes
on
1,140 Posts
#6
i agree. it could be a good base for a new SVT lightning or something. I'd take that engine in a truck that i could keep pretty for sunday driving and highway trips... I think it'll be awesome for that!!
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
#10
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,943
Received 1,384 Likes
on
1,140 Posts
#12
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,943
Received 1,384 Likes
on
1,140 Posts
#15
I believe I read somewhere that it was supposed to be a 3.5 liter ecoboost was it not?
Would be great for light duty applications, but Im not so sure about heavier use either.
I bet a 4.6 v8 in a reg cab shortbox, with a manual, and tall grears would get damn near, if not more, then a 4.3 v6.
Ive heard guys with crown vics, and those lincoln mark VIII's (with the 4.6l) claim around and over the 30mpg mark.
Would be great for light duty applications, but Im not so sure about heavier use either.
I bet a 4.6 v8 in a reg cab shortbox, with a manual, and tall grears would get damn near, if not more, then a 4.3 v6.
Ive heard guys with crown vics, and those lincoln mark VIII's (with the 4.6l) claim around and over the 30mpg mark.