Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

Lets build a CR PSD.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 11:25 PM
  #31  
Tenn01PSD350's Avatar
Tenn01PSD350
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,892
Likes: 2
From: Middle Tennessee
Has anybody ever figured out just how much HP a 7.3 block can reliably support? Skip all the other problems. This would be my first concern. Then driveability, then $$$$. Well maybe not that order. TTT anyway.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 12:33 AM
  #32  
That_Guy's Avatar
That_Guy
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 0
From: Brinklow Md
Originally Posted by Tenn01PSD350
Has anybody ever figured out just how much HP a 7.3 block can reliably support? Skip all the other problems. This would be my first concern. Then driveability, then $$$$. Well maybe not that order. TTT anyway.
Thats probably the most important question that needs to be answered.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 12:59 AM
  #33  
jtharvey's Avatar
jtharvey
Lead Driver
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 1
From: Columbia, MO
Mike, that's kind of a tough question. With the limitations of the HEUI system, we've seen it's not that much, unless the block is strengthened significantly with the use of girdles an block filling. The HEUI system, at this point in time, simply does not allow for the control of the fuel, creating too much torque at the wrong time, thus splitting blocks.

However, with the proper control over injection, I think the block itself can withstand some pretty significant HP numbers. To look at DO again, granted it is a filled block, but having proper control over the injection event via mechanical pump, we can see the block is capable of handling some very large HP numbers. IIRC, Ben has broken or bent a few rods, with the block holding strong. I'm not 100% on that, but that's what comes to mind when I try to remember.

I'm thinking once the injection event is under better control, the fears of the block splitting will be significantly less than what they are now, and the block itself will be capable of taking the 800-900+ HP numbers that the others brands are putting out.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 01:09 AM
  #34  
Tenn01PSD350's Avatar
Tenn01PSD350
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,892
Likes: 2
From: Middle Tennessee
I hear what you are saying Jeremy, but I also feel in the back of my mind that he has about 10 times the investment in fueling, tuning, and charging than the block. Destroying a block looks like small beans to me and we're not likely to hear about it. I sure hope you're right but evidence dictates otherwise. I have a healthy block for now, just crappy rods, but if I got what I asked for it should outlast my tranny.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 01:21 AM
  #35  
jtharvey's Avatar
jtharvey
Lead Driver
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 1
From: Columbia, MO
I have no doubt that he's got a ton of money wrapped up in the fueling. I want to say he's got $50K in just the heads to get the injectors and stuff in there. The whole motor is estimated to be at $100K, IIRC. I would just think that with as much attention as his truck gets, someone would post about a broken block. I know I've seen a few posts about mangled rods. They may have taken out the block, but the rods gave out first, rather than the block.

Honestly though, I don't know and you have a very valid point. It's may very well be something that's happened and we have no idea about it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 01:31 AM
  #36  
Tenn01PSD350's Avatar
Tenn01PSD350
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,892
Likes: 2
From: Middle Tennessee
Mangled rods in a rotating assembly. Hmmm. Do you have any input on what that can do to a block? To be truthful, we don't even know if the main webs may have given up the ghost leading to mangled rods. We just don't know. I do know I have heard of blocks cracking in lesser trucks. These had all the "goodies" to protects the rotating assembly and of course the girdle.

I know I sound pessimistic, and I'm preaching to the choir with you, but again, why? Keep it real, be happy, or move on. That is my opinion.

Dockboy gave up for a reason. He blew enough 7.3s for me.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 03:14 AM
  #37  
HookedOnFuel's Avatar
HookedOnFuel
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 157
Likes: 1
What's the price of this...

YouTube - Stroked Out starting and running


I'll right a check now!
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 05:42 AM
  #38  
PowerstrokeJunkie's Avatar
PowerstrokeJunkie
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 14,582
Likes: 12
From: 21791
Deereman, whats this "we" stuff? lol

To start off, the 6.4 heads use 4 bolts per cylinder, instead of 6, so it wont even be close. Putting them on the 6.0 is a better option, and even then im not sure the valves would fit down in the cylinder.

The HP is not the problem with splitting blocks. Its the torque. A non-filled 7.3 block even with a girdle (a girdle doesnt really help, WHERE they tend to split) will support roughly 1500 lb-ft of torque, before they like to crack. It's just the grade of cast iron, and the V shaped design that just rips itself apart. The block filler is where this really helps, bottom area of the water jackets, and the cam webbing is greatly strengthened when you fill the bottom half or so of the water jackets. But the problem with the HEUI system in the years past (cant say currently!) was that it could not fuel heavily over 2800rpm, limiting power. So, to get a higher power number, you would have to increase torque, to get a better power number. Advanced injection timing and longer pulsewidth was needed, larger nozzles to get the fuel out quickly, etc. Because HP is just a function of TQ and RPM, that would mean if you got 1500 lb-ft at 2400rpm, you would have 685hp. Now, with the current electronic modifications, and the injector porting methods being tested, you can get say 1300 lb-ft at 4000 rpm, which means LESS block splitting torque, but a ****load more HP, 990 to be exact. Think that's not possible? How about more realistic numbers that people put down, say 1150lb-ft at 2600rpm= 569hp. Seems like a few guys out there easily make that. Now, if you can stop the injectors from falling on their face, and make that 1150lb-ft, up around 4000rpm, thats 875hp, without adding any more torque load to the engine. Does that make sense to anyone?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 05:47 AM
  #39  
PowerstrokeJunkie's Avatar
PowerstrokeJunkie
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 14,582
Likes: 12
From: 21791
Originally Posted by Tenn01PSD350
Mangled rods in a rotating assembly. Hmmm. Do you have any input on what that can do to a block? To be truthful, we don't even know if the main webs may have given up the ghost leading to mangled rods. We just don't know. I do know I have heard of blocks cracking in lesser trucks. These had all the "goodies" to protects the rotating assembly and of course the girdle.

I know I sound pessimistic, and I'm preaching to the choir with you, but again, why? Keep it real, be happy, or move on. That is my opinion.

Dockboy gave up for a reason. He blew enough 7.3s for me.
He gave up too soon, IMO. Yeah he is making tons more power in a 5.9 now, however, I *think* he didnt have a filled block, which is what really holds the block itself together at high HP levels, from the inside out. It seemed like right when he gave up, swamps and a few other guys came out with IDM/ECM and injector mods that will make 2009 a BIG *** year in 7.3 powerstroke performance.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 07:25 AM
  #40  
bdrummonds's Avatar
bdrummonds
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,584
Likes: 0
From: Millbrook Alabama
Originally Posted by strokin_it7.3
Deereman, whats this "we" stuff? lol

To start off, the 6.4 heads use 4 bolts per cylinder, instead of 6, so it wont even be close. Putting them on the 6.0 is a better option, and even then im not sure the valves would fit down in the cylinder.

The HP is not the problem with splitting blocks. Its the torque. A non-filled 7.3 block even with a girdle (a girdle doesnt really help, WHERE they tend to split) will support roughly 1500 lb-ft of torque, before they like to crack. It's just the grade of cast iron, and the V shaped design that just rips itself apart. The block filler is where this really helps, bottom area of the water jackets, and the cam webbing is greatly strengthened when you fill the bottom half or so of the water jackets. But the problem with the HEUI system in the years past (cant say currently!) was that it could not fuel heavily over 2800rpm, limiting power. So, to get a higher power number, you would have to increase torque, to get a better power number. Advanced injection timing and longer pulsewidth was needed, larger nozzles to get the fuel out quickly, etc. Because HP is just a function of TQ and RPM, that would mean if you got 1500 lb-ft at 2400rpm, you would have 685hp. Now, with the current electronic modifications, and the injector porting methods being tested, you can get say 1300 lb-ft at 4000 rpm, which means LESS block splitting torque, but a ****load more HP, 990 to be exact. Think that's not possible? How about more realistic numbers that people put down, say 1150lb-ft at 2600rpm= 569hp. Seems like a few guys out there easily make that. Now, if you can stop the injectors from falling on their face, and make that 1150lb-ft, up around 4000rpm, thats 875hp, without adding any more torque load to the engine. Does that make sense to anyone?
I'm smelling what your cooking here Kris! Hence we (some of the tuners), now understand the work around for the revlimiting and how to control the injection event and torque output at higher rpms, thus we ARE going to see more high horspower trucks in the near future.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 09:56 AM
  #41  
jtharvey's Avatar
jtharvey
Lead Driver
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 1
From: Columbia, MO
Originally Posted by strokin_it7.3
... IDM/ECM and injector mods that will make 2009 a BIG *** year in 7.3 powerstroke performance.
Kris, we've talked about this before, so you know what I'm about to say, but I won't believe it until I see it. The performance companies have been saying it for years that this next year is the big one for the 7.3.

Every winter since '04 or '05, it's always been, "Man, this next year is gonna be the year for the 7.3," but it never happens. It would be nice to see someone actually do something with it, instead of just saying that they're developing this or that, which is gonna be the key.

One other thing to think about. While the 7.3 is definitely getting more powerful, and looks to be able to make 700-800 HP reliably, keep in mind the CR trucks (both Cummins and D-Max) are now breaking the 1000 HP mark on a relatively regular occurrence. I'm afraid that the 7.3 is always going to be a couple years and a couple hundred HP behind. That doesn't make it a bad engine, just not the best platform for building big HP, IMO.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 10:15 AM
  #42  
powerstroked162's Avatar
powerstroked162
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,658
Likes: 0
From: Ellensburg, Washington
Originally Posted by strokin_it7.3
give me, and a few other guys another year or two in the business.

Take all the time you need cause I can promise you that people already are where you want to be in a year from now

Cowboy Steve
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 11:44 AM
  #43  
That_Guy's Avatar
That_Guy
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 0
From: Brinklow Md
Originally Posted by strokin_it7.3
Does that make sense to anyone?
Yea, even with my vast knowledge on the 7.3 I understood
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 01:48 PM
  #44  
powerstroked162's Avatar
powerstroked162
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,658
Likes: 0
From: Ellensburg, Washington
Originally Posted by jtharvey
I'm afraid that the 7.3 is always going to be a couple years and a couple hundred HP behind. That doesn't make it a bad engine, just not the best platform for building big HP, IMO.
Agreed, nobody is going to go out and set the world on fire with big HP numbers, remember this is a powerstroke

Cowboy Steve
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lfree6
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
1
Aug 3, 2011 11:23 AM
jasonnilsson
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Jun 15, 2011 07:55 PM
reamer
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
Oct 28, 2009 10:55 PM
Blubeast01
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
13
Oct 20, 2003 08:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE