Notices

406fe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #16  
FFR428's Avatar
FFR428
Needsmorecoffee.
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 2
From: CT
Club FTE Silver Member

That's right Bill you are correct on that. I'm not sure what books list it but Dennis Kolodziej might have some factory info on it. I do remember he said with the 406 to 427 change over so close the 8V setup was available and installed on some of the 62 406 factory LW Galaxies. Ford also sold a "lightweight kit" in 62 for private racers who were not factory sponsored. DST, X Garage and Wayne Assy plant produced these cars mostly for SS/S class. So there is a very good chance there is not much documentation on paper. But if there is either Dennis K or John Vermeersh would have it. I've spoke with Dennis a few times on 406 stuff and he's a wealth of information on the 406 LWG's, Tbolts and pretty much anything performance related from Ford. While most books list the 6 most common 406 blocks Dennis rattled off about another 7-8 that are documented I've never even heard of!! LOL!!!
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 11:35 PM
  #17  
bluesky636's Avatar
bluesky636
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Centreville USA
Originally Posted by Bear 45/70
Interesting claim, but Ford does not say that is true, so you will have to come up with a cite and numbers to make me believe it.
Go to the library and do a little research on your own. If you haven't found the books that are out there in a day or so, I will be glad to site author, book name, and page. I have them all.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 11:38 PM
  #18  
bluesky636's Avatar
bluesky636
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Centreville USA
Originally Posted by FFR428
That's right Bill you are correct on that. I'm not sure what books list it but Dennis Kolodziej might have some factory info on it. I do remember he said with the 406 to 427 change over so close the 8V setup was available and installed on some of the 62 406 factory LW Galaxies. Ford also sold a "lightweight kit" in 62 for private racers who were not factory sponsored. DST, X Garage and Wayne Assy plant produced these cars mostly for SS/S class. So there is a very good chance there is not much documentation on paper. But if there is either Dennis K or John Vermeersh would have it. I've spoke with Dennis a few times on 406 stuff and he's a wealth of information on the 406 LWG's, Tbolts and pretty much anything performance related from Ford. While most books list the 6 most common 406 blocks Dennis rattled off about another 7-8 that are documented I've never even heard of!! LOL!!!
I know I am correct. I have the books by well respected authors who do their research to prove it. They are all available at the local bookstore or library.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 01:27 AM
  #19  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
Originally Posted by bluesky636
Go to the library and do a little research on your own. If you haven't found the books that are out there in a day or so, I will be glad to site author, book name, and page. I have them all.
I've been racing Fords since the mid 60s and also have all the Ford Muscle parts books and there is no mention of any 8V 406s.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 01:31 AM
  #20  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
Originally Posted by bluesky636
I know I am correct. I have the books by well respected authors who do their research to prove it. They are all available at the local bookstore or library.
If you have the books, either give a reference, that's a cite, and I'll look, otherwise I'm gonna call .
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 09:08 AM
  #21  
FFR428's Avatar
FFR428
Needsmorecoffee.
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 2
From: CT
Club FTE Silver Member

Bill I'd be interested to know what books (names and authors) those are when you have the chance. I'd like to see if the library has them or if I can order them from Borders our local book store.

Bear I don't think the 406 8V setup was mentioned in the 69 version Ford Muscle Parts or Off Highway Parts books. But when I was talking to Bill ( Numb Dummy) last he got his hands on a very early 60's copy of a Hipo Performance catalog. There might be some mention of it in there. He'd never seen this one before! Perhaps he'll chime in if he reads this hopefully. Might have been from Holman Moody possibly?? I can't remember exactly.

If anyone wants to read some of the old Ford performance catalogs Mustang Tek has them scanned and can be viewed in the library section at Ford casting ID numbers and part identification info for Mustang Shelby parts Some good test drive and reviews on some of the old muscle cars too.

FWIW....
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 09:16 AM
  #22  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Bear 45/70
Interesting claim, but Ford does not say that is true, so you will have to come up with a cite and numbers to make me believe it.
I just acquired six different Ford HiPo Parts Catalogs from the mid 1960's (these pre-date the Muscle Parts Catalogs).

C3AZ-9424-L .. 8V Intake Manifold / Catalog sez use before 1/24/64 / Fits: 1962/63 406.

After 1/24/64, the catalog lists: C3AZ-9424-M.

C3AZ-9424-M was later replaced by C5AZ-9424-C.

Both C3AZ-M & C5AZ-C are also listed in the 1960/64 Passenger Car Parts Catalog.

C3AZ-9424-L is not.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 09:47 AM
  #23  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
I just acquired six different Ford HiPo Parts Catalogs from the mid 1960's (these pre-date the Muscle Parts Catalogs).

C3AZ-9424-L .. 8V Intake Manifold / Catalog sez use before 1/24/64 / Fits: 1962/63 406.

After 1/24/64, the catalog lists: C3AZ-9424-M.

C3AZ-9424-M was later replaced by C5AZ-9424-C.

Both C3AZ-M & C5AZ-C are also listed in the 1960/64 Passenger Car Parts Catalog.

C3AZ-9424-L is not.
So the numbers say it was a 1963 part. Which is when the 427 appeared, so then Ford just retro fitted the 8V to the 406.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-1

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-6

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-8

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 10:08 AM
  #24  
FFR428's Avatar
FFR428
Needsmorecoffee.
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 2
From: CT
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by NumberDummy
I just acquired six different Ford HiPo Parts Catalogs from the mid 1960's (these pre-date the Muscle Parts Catalogs).

C3AZ-9424-L .. 8V Intake Manifold / Catalog sez use before 1/24/64 / Fits: 1962/63 406.

After 1/24/64, the catalog lists: C3AZ-9424-M.

C3AZ-9424-M was later replaced by C5AZ-9424-C.

Both C3AZ-M & C5AZ-C are also listed in the 1960/64 Passenger Car Parts Catalog.

C3AZ-9424-L is not.
Interesting! Thanks for posting that Bill.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #25  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by FFR428
Interesting! Thanks for posting that Bill.
I haven't forgotten.

I was digging thru some other parts catalogs, found duplicates of the hipo catalogs, so one a these days...
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 10:36 AM
  #26  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Bear 45/70
So the numbers say it was a 1963 part. Which is when the 427 appeared, so then Ford just retro fitted the 8V to the 406.
It's not a retrofit. The catalog cleary states 406 for C3AZ-9424-L.

427's used this one: C3AZ-9424-M later replaced by C5AZ-9424-C.

The 427, as I recall wasn't available till midyear 1963. It debuted along with the Galaxie/Marauder fastbacks refered to as 1963 1/2's by enthusiasts.

3 deuces were also offered on 1962/63 T-Bird's with 390's. The VIN engine code is M.

Most of the 3 deuce setups were installed on the Sport Roadster model.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 11:09 AM
  #27  
bluesky636's Avatar
bluesky636
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Centreville USA
Well, we all know that if Bear didn't see it happen or make it happen himself, then it didn't happen.

Total Performers: Ford Drag Racing in the 1960s by Charlie Morris. Published 2005 by Car Tech. See reference in Chapter 3, page 25 and page 27. See photograph on page 29.

Factory Lightweights: Detroits Drag Racing Specials of the 60s, also by Charlie Morris. Published 2007 by Car Tech. See reference in Chapter 3, page 28. See photograph on page 27.

Note that these references deal primarily with the lightweights driven by Dick Brannan. Like I said in my original post, these two 4-bbl intakes were obviously not available over the counter in 1962 to Joe Average (including you, Bear), but that doesn't mean that they did not exist (maybe without an official part number) and were available to Ford's TOP racers before they were available to the general public the following year.

Mr. Morris is a well known and respected automotive author. If anyone thinks he is wrong, feel free to present YOUR proof.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 11:22 AM
  #28  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by bluesky636
Well, we all know that if Bear didn't see it happen or make it happen himself, then it didn't happen.

Total Performers: Ford Drag Racing in the 1960s by Charlie Morris. Published 2005 by Car Tech. See reference in Chapter 3, page 25 and page 27. See photograph on page 29.

Factory Lightweights: Detroits Drag Racing Specials of the 60s, also by Charlie Morris. Published 2007 by Car Tech. See reference in Chapter 3, page 28. See photograph on page 27.

Note that these references deal primarily with the lightweights driven by Dick Brannan. Like I said in my original post, these two 4-bbl intakes were obviously not available over the counter in 1962 to Joe Average (including you, Bear), but that doesn't mean that they did not exist (maybe without an official part number) and were available to Ford's TOP racers before they were available to the general public the following year.

Mr. Morris is a well known and respected automotive author. If anyone thinks he is wrong, feel free to present YOUR proof.
The official FoMoCo part number for the 406 8V intake manifold is C3AZ-9424-L.

C3AZ-9424-M is shown for 427's.

These part numbers come straight from the 1961/67 Ford High Performance Parts Catalog.

This is not a Muscle Parts Catalog, as Ford didn't offer them till late 1968.

The introduction in this particular catalog was written by Ak Miller.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 12:08 PM
  #29  
FFR428's Avatar
FFR428
Needsmorecoffee.
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 2
From: CT
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by NumberDummy
I haven't forgotten.

I was digging thru some other parts catalogs, found duplicates of the hipo catalogs, so one a these days...
Whenever you have the chance Bill. No hurry at all my friend and I VERY much appreciate it!! I hope I can somehow repay the favor sometime.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 12:43 PM
  #30  
FFR428's Avatar
FFR428
Needsmorecoffee.
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 2
From: CT
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by bluesky636
Well, we all know that if Bear didn't see it happen or make it happen himself, then it didn't happen.

Total Performers: Ford Drag Racing in the 1960s by Charlie Morris. Published 2005 by Car Tech. See reference in Chapter 3, page 25 and page 27. See photograph on page 29.

Factory Lightweights: Detroits Drag Racing Specials of the 60s, also by Charlie Morris. Published 2007 by Car Tech. See reference in Chapter 3, page 28. See photograph on page 27.

Note that these references deal primarily with the lightweights driven by Dick Brannan. Like I said in my original post, these two 4-bbl intakes were obviously not available over the counter in 1962 to Joe Average (including you, Bear), but that doesn't mean that they did not exist (maybe without an official part number) and were available to Ford's TOP racers before they were available to the general public the following year.

Mr. Morris is a well known and respected automotive author. If anyone thinks he is wrong, feel free to present YOUR proof.

Bill H, thank you very much!! I'll see if the library has them. If not I'll head to Borders and order them. I thought they might be the Charlie Morris books but I didn't know the titles. Don't be to hard on Bear. I can understand his point of view. With all of the myths and hearsay I too like to see actual facts back these things up. But I always try to keep a open mind to everything until they can be proven to be true or not. The factory racers from the day were most always given these parts and as we know many were not available to the average Joes. Some as prototype with SK, XE numbers and some one off experimental.

A friend of mine has a factory prototype 3x2 intake for a 429. One of 3 ever made. His was the only one finished and on a dyno mule in the X garage. The other 2, one was cut up to check the casting porisity and the other never finish machined. After Ford shut down their racing program these and many other experimental parts were buried in a big hole and a parking lot made over them. How this one escaped who knows. But it did. There is a funny story how he almost lost it at the Ford 100th reunion he brought it to. But that's a story for another time. Same guy owns and restored the "Fast Eddie" Boss9 Maverick. Some of you might know him?

These topics are always interesting to me. And become quite informative as this one has. It's been a pleasure to be a part of this one.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 PM.

story-0
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-3
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-5
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-7
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-8
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-9
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE