Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

diesel with no turbo...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 07:03 PM
  #1  
kemerick's Avatar
kemerick
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
diesel with no turbo...

This is just a silly question but who much horsepower/torque would a diesel truck like ours make without a turbo? A co-worker always says diesels make "no power" without a turbo. Obviously not true but just something I have wondered.


 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 07:47 PM
  #2  
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,626
Likes: 7
From: Plano TX and Brentwood TN
I think that you could probably knock off about 50hp for our turbos. Rough estimate, but I think with everything else being the same, I think about 50hp less without the turbos would be a good estimate. I have nothing solid to back that up with, still a guess.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #3  
kemerick's Avatar
kemerick
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Based upon your signature it sounds like an educated guess... better than mine at least. Maybe someone else out there knows...
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 07:56 PM
  #4  
kemerick's Avatar
kemerick
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
I am sure someone out there right now is taking their turbo off, getting the dyno prepped and will have the results...


 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 09:38 PM
  #5  
duffman77's Avatar
duffman77
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
It would suck, my estimate half the HP and 60% the Tq.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 09:49 PM
  #6  
liv's Avatar
liv
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City/Breckenridge
Originally Posted by duffman77
It would suck, my estimate half the HP and 60% the Tq.
+1 it would be way more than 50hp you have to think about how much air that turbo is putting into the cylinders without all that air you can't put anywhere close to as much fuel as it does now.

anyone know what the ol' 7.3 IDI n/a put out?

there's plenty of non turbo diesels out there but they are BIG motors like the 7.3. The advantage turbo's have is that you can use much smaller motor's

edit

7.3 L V8 1988-91 180 hp (135 kW) 365 lb-ft (495 N·m) Diesel
7.3 L V8 1988-91 180 hp (135 kW) 425 lb-ft (575 N·m) Turbodiesel

idk toss-up I guess
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 09:58 PM
  #7  
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,626
Likes: 7
From: Plano TX and Brentwood TN
Originally Posted by liv
+1 it would be way more than 50hp you have to think about how much air that turbo is putting into the cylinders without all that air you can't put anywhere close to as much fuel as it does now.

anyone know what the ol' 7.3 IDI n/a put out?

there's plenty of non turbo diesels out there but they are BIG motors like the 7.3. The advantage turbo's have is that you can use much smaller motor's

edit

7.3 L V8 1988-91 180 hp (135 kW) 365 lb-ft (495 N·m) Diesel
7.3 L V8 1988-91 180 hp (135 kW) 425 lb-ft (575 N·m) Turbodiesel

idk toss-up I guess
Your also talking about indirect injected diesels versus direct injection. I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't compare two different injection types unless I knew for sure that it wouldn't affect the outcome of comparing IDIs to modern diesels. Really the only way that would be able to truly get a fair shake as to how much horses you'll lose(and torque) is if someone was to take a 6.0 and take the turbo off and reprogram the computer and do it that way.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 09:59 PM
  #8  
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 24,724
Likes: 72
From: Blue Hill Township
Club FTE Gold Member
N/A diesels are quite putsy
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 10:09 PM
  #9  
liv's Avatar
liv
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City/Breckenridge
Originally Posted by tex25025
Your also talking about indirect injected diesels versus direct injection. I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't compare two different injection types unless I knew for sure that it wouldn't affect the outcome of comparing IDIs to modern diesels. Really the only way that would be able to truly get a fair shake as to how much horses you'll lose(and torque) is if someone was to take a 6.0 and take the turbo off and reprogram the computer and do it that way.
Yea I know. I wasn't really trying to compare them just was curious. I thought it would be a bigger difference.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 10:48 PM
  #10  
hdway's Avatar
hdway
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Blew the elbow off the turbo on my 04 6.0 this summer while pulling my 11,000 lb 5th wheel on the interstate this summer thought the truck blew up. After stoping and checking everything out with the engine shut down could not find anything so started it up and tried to pull away took about 25 ft. to figure out something major was wrong check boost gauge no boost no power I think it would be about 1/2 of normal pulling power.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 10:51 PM
  #11  
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 1
From: None of your business
I would think a modern, non turbo diesel would be in the mid 200s for HP and 400s for TQ. It would probably be really sluggish though. Without that turbo, the low PRMs would really limit it.

It would probably get decent MPGs though.

Mike
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 02:19 AM
  #12  
Benchwrench's Avatar
Benchwrench
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 7
From: Circle City
the 7.3 IDI was 180 horse and the first turbo powerstroke was @ 210.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 01:18 PM
  #13  
jimmy-six's Avatar
jimmy-six
Laughing Gas
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 6
From: Fountain Valley
A friend of mine has a new 94 6.9 bought with no turbo...Absolute dog. The 95's had one. He went to Banks but it only has 9 psi of boost. Is adequate but nothing like a 7.3 od 6.0.........Good Luck
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #14  
Bulldog66's Avatar
Bulldog66
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Designs w/out the Turbo compared to designs w/one can't be made. Take the turbo off of a 6.0 and you've a boat anchor.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 06:47 PM
  #15  
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,626
Likes: 7
From: Plano TX and Brentwood TN
Originally Posted by Bulldog66
Designs w/out the Turbo compared to designs w/one can't be made. Take the turbo off of a 6.0 and you've a boat anchor.
That was already mentioned before, topic just got sidetracked. I don't believe boat anchor would be exactly the truth. While there is no doubt that a turbo does help with hp and tq, I think people have greatly over exaggerated it's benefit. I have had exhaust leaks(more pronounced with a non-vgt turbo like I have) and the turbo for all practical purposes was out of the loop power wise. Had to watch the EGTs as they would spike really really quickly, but it was still able to haul quite easily. Worse thing was that it smoked something awful due to the bigger injectors(which could skew my results from someone with all stock, but still my injectors were matched with the turbo that I had).
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 PM.