Notices
Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150 SVT Ford F150 Lightning, Roush, Saleen and other performance F150's

oil separator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 01:58 PM
  #1  
budribbs's Avatar
budribbs
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
oil separator

i purchased an oil separator kit about two months ogo from rpm outlet i did not install yet because i,m not impressed with it. any one know were i can get a better kit
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 01:03 AM
  #2  
Stewart_H's Avatar
Stewart_H
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 29,380
Likes: 118
From: Central Coast of CA
Club FTE Gold Member
L&S has a setup that works, but is ungodly expensive.

Garrett at DMR has a similar setup that works just as well, for less.

oil_separator

Stewart
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 02:04 PM
  #3  
Silver Streak's Avatar
Silver Streak
Postmaster
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 3
From: Broken Arrow, OK
I have a nearly free setup on my truck and it has worked well for me. I installed it after my truck started spitting out a cloud of smoke at start up and people were mistaking it for a small block Chevy. After I bypassed the PCV hose that bleeds boost into the crank case the cloud disappeared. Here's what you do:

Locate the PCV hose on the passenger's side valvecover. About halfway between the PCV valve and the upper intake you will find a rubber T that has a line running to the rear of the blower. The line running to the rear of the intake is evil for a few reasons. One, it bleeds boost into the crank case and blows oil vapors backwards thorugh the system into the intake boot. Two, it allows hot boost to recirculate through the upper intake preheating the incoming air. Three, it bleeds off boost. If you remove the T and replace it with a straight piece of vacuum line connecting the PCV valve directly to the plenum you get rid of all three of those problems. Put a plug over the eliminated line and secure it with a clamp and you're done. With that line out of the picture the crankcase will never see any pressure above atmospheric, and will probably see a slight vacuum even at WOT which might be worth a pony or two. I think it's also worth one or two lbs of boost, but it's hard to tell with the stock gauge.
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #4  
Milwaukee's Avatar
Milwaukee
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
I just used a compressor water collector.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 05:24 PM
  #5  
ace555's Avatar
ace555
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
Originally Posted by Silver Streak
I have a nearly free setup on my truck and it has worked well for me. I installed it after my truck started spitting out a cloud of smoke at start up and people were mistaking it for a small block Chevy. After I bypassed the PCV hose that bleeds boost into the crank case the cloud disappeared. Here's what you do:

Locate the PCV hose on the passenger's side valvecover. About halfway between the PCV valve and the upper intake you will find a rubber T that has a line running to the rear of the blower. The line running to the rear of the intake is evil for a few reasons. One, it bleeds boost into the crank case and blows oil vapors backwards thorugh the system into the intake boot. Two, it allows hot boost to recirculate through the upper intake preheating the incoming air. Three, it bleeds off boost. If you remove the T and replace it with a straight piece of vacuum line connecting the PCV valve directly to the plenum you get rid of all three of those problems. Put a plug over the eliminated line and secure it with a clamp and you're done. With that line out of the picture the crankcase will never see any pressure above atmospheric, and will probably see a slight vacuum even at WOT which might be worth a pony or two. I think it's also worth one or two lbs of boost, but it's hard to tell with the stock gauge.




Ok here's my question if you add a lower and upper pulley to your truck (good for 13lbs total) like i have, wouldn't you want as much oil as possible going into the s/c because of the extra rpm's? also I have white smoke at wot for a spirt- Isn't that also due to this problem as well?
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 07:56 AM
  #6  
Silver Streak's Avatar
Silver Streak
Postmaster
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 3
From: Broken Arrow, OK
Why would you want any oil in the SC?

A puff of smoke at WOT could be caused by this or several other things.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #7  
Stewart_H's Avatar
Stewart_H
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 29,380
Likes: 118
From: Central Coast of CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by ace555
...wouldn't you want as much oil as possible going into the s/c because of the extra rpm's?
Ace, there's no way you can look at the following pictures and still believe you want oil to be sucked into the s/c.

Bottom of s/c...

-----------------------------------------------

Backside of throttle body...

-----------------------------------------------

Intercooler...

-----------------------------------------------

I/C "valley"...

-----------------------------------------------

How can all that be good, bro?

Coat the fins of the intercooler with enough oil and you'll reduce the efficiency of its cooling properties, which can raise the air charge temps, which can cause the PCM to pull timing, which will reduce your performance and power output.

Stewart
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 03:41 PM
  #8  
ace555's Avatar
ace555
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
Ok i hear you man, and i think it makes sense too. But why would ford design the supercharger to suck oil into the s/c from the valve body then? And you still think even with the extra amount of boost i'm running that its still fine to have an oil separator?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 9, 2008 | 03:46 PM
  #9  
Silver Streak's Avatar
Silver Streak
Postmaster
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 3
From: Broken Arrow, OK
They didn't design it that way; it's a side affect of using a supercharger. Nothing should be touching inside the blower, so there is no need for any oil
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 04:02 PM
  #10  
FTE Ken's Avatar
FTE Ken
Post Fiend
25 Year Member
Joined: Jan 1997
Posts: 23,165
Likes: 18
From: Enjoying the real world.
While this is certainly a great mod, I don't see it being good for 1-2lbs of boost. I just don't see how a tube that small can move that much air. Power benefits are probably due mostly to a cooler intake stream. I've got an accurate self-calibrating gauge and will find out this weekend after I mod it.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #11  
Silver Streak's Avatar
Silver Streak
Postmaster
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 3
From: Broken Arrow, OK
Like I said, it's hard to tell with the stock gauge. The needle was noticably further into boost, but we all know the stock gauge sucks and once it's over 10 psi there's no reference point to judge from. A relatively small tube can be a big leak. I don't know how big the stock valves are, but you figure a 1.75" valve open .400" has 2.1 sq in of curtain area. A 3/8" tube has roughly .12 sq in, or just over 5% of the intake valve. 1 psi would be roughly 8% of 12 psi, so it isn't that far fetched when you consider that the tube will flow more efficiently than the valve will. There will always be more than one intake valve open, but the total opening will rarely be more than equivalent to one vavle at max lift. I think. It's late, it was a long flight and my brain feels like jelly.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2008 | 04:48 AM
  #12  
Davepig's Avatar
Davepig
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ace555
Ok i hear you man, and i think it makes sense too. But why would ford design the supercharger to suck oil into the s/c from the valve body then? And you still think even with the extra amount of boost i'm running that its still fine to have an oil separator?
They didn't design it that way, they just didn't look down the road that much or catch the problem during initial design.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2008 | 01:18 PM
  #13  
ace555's Avatar
ace555
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
Originally Posted by Davepig
They didn't design it that way, they just didn't look down the road that much or catch the problem during initial design.

Ok well why didn't they just change this small flaw along with the upgraded 2 or 3 rows in the intercooler on the 01 L's, and then again they could have in the 03-04s with the extra threads in the heads? My point is there have been many chances for Ford to do something about this problem. Don't get me wrong, i've been through a lot with my truck (just ask Stewart) and I understand what everyone is saying here, but my large question at hand is- would this oil separator pro-long or shorten our s/c's life? I Don't want anymore problems or bills coming out of my truck. Gas is already a B as it is.....
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2008 | 09:00 PM
  #14  
Davepig's Avatar
Davepig
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ace555
Ok well why didn't they just change this small flaw along with the upgraded 2 or 3 rows in the intercooler on the 01 L's, and then again they could have in the 03-04s with the extra threads in the heads? My point is there have been many chances for Ford to do something about this problem. Don't get me wrong, i've been through a lot with my truck (just ask Stewart) and I understand what everyone is saying here, but my large question at hand is- would this oil separator pro-long or shorten our s/c's life? I Don't want anymore problems or bills coming out of my truck. Gas is already a B as it is.....
The oil separator is there to stop the oil from getting to the blower. Oil breaks down the teflon coating on the blower lobes, and also cloggs up the cooler as was shown in the pictures, causing detonation in the engines combustion chambers, etc, so we don't want it to get to the blower. The lobes don't require any sort of lubrication, so adding the separator is a good thing, and it would prolong the blower and it's associated parts life for the most part.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #15  
Silver Streak's Avatar
Silver Streak
Postmaster
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 3
From: Broken Arrow, OK
Originally Posted by ace555
Ok well why didn't they just change this small flaw along with the upgraded 2 or 3 rows in the intercooler on the 01 L's, and then again they could have in the 03-04s with the extra threads in the heads? My point is there have been many chances for Ford to do something about this problem.

My guess would be that those are both mechanical changes to the engine. Alterations to the PCV system would likely require the emmission control system to be recertified and that would have cost a ton. If this problem has been known about when they upped the power in 01 they probably could have done it then, but it wasn't and they didn't. The engines lasted 3 yrs/36k miles and that's all they are worried about.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE