Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

4V Versus 2V - 400M

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 05:48 AM
  #1  
78REDFORD's Avatar
78REDFORD
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Rossville, IN
4V Versus 2V - 400M

After doing some looking around on the site, I have learned that the 4V carb setup was not a factory option for a 1978 with a 400 in my truck. So that gets me to wondering about application. I only use this truck for hauling a camper around, and my gooseneck dump trailer. I'm not interested in going 100 mph, but need best MPG I can get, and good power to get up and go when its time to. I currently have an Edlebrock intake and Holley 650CFM installed. Should I swap out the 4V setup for a 2V?
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 05:58 AM
  #2  
fastfarmer's Avatar
fastfarmer
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 754
Likes: 2
From: southwest Wisconsin
If your holley is working well leave it on. Difference in fuel milage will be minimal and you'll have better power with the 4bbl.
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 06:00 AM
  #3  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 78REDFORD
After doing some looking around on the site, I have learned that the 4V carb setup was not a factory option for a 1978 with a 400 in my truck.

So that gets me to wondering about application.

I only use this truck for hauling a camper around, and my gooseneck dump trailer. I'm not interested in going 100 mph, but need best MPG I can get, and good power to get up and go when its time to. I currently have an Edlebrock intake and Holley 650CFM installed. Should I swap out the 4V setup for a 2V?
A 4V carb was not available on any Ford F100/350 with a 351M or 400 engine (1977/82).

It was not available on the cars with 351M's (1975/79) or 400's (1971/79) either.

351M/400 = 2V carbs only (that also includes 1978/82 Bronco's and 1980/82 Econolines).
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 06:04 AM
  #4  
78REDFORD's Avatar
78REDFORD
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Rossville, IN
Thats kinda the problem is that the Holley is not operating correctly. I can't get the secondaries to open up, and have a real idling problem with it during warmup. I'm pretty sure that there are other issues contributing to poor performance of the carb - but I thought that if might have to replace carb, I might as well ask about which would be better. Also, I've been told that if I replace the 4v with another 4V that I should get an Edlebrock and get rid of Holley because they are finicky for everyday drivers?
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 06:06 AM
  #5  
78REDFORD's Avatar
78REDFORD
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Rossville, IN
Thanks NumberDummy, good info!
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #6  
beartracks's Avatar
beartracks
Lead Driver
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 6,647
Likes: 352
From: Albuquerque
A small 4V actually has smaller primary bores that the stock 2V. i.e. if your foot isn't in it you could actually get better milage. The power is there when you need it. On the other hand if it's not working right...............
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #7  
mark a.'s Avatar
mark a.
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,924
Likes: 153
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
A 4V carb was not available on any Ford F100/350 with a 351M or 400 engine (1977/82).

It was not available on the cars with 351M's (1975/79) or 400's (1971/79) either.

351M/400 = 2V carbs only (that also includes 1978/82 Bronco's and 1980/82 Econolines).
Never say never ! Factory 4V Ford 400 intakes have poped up on Ebay through the years.



 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 01:08 PM
  #8  
Mil1ion's Avatar
Mil1ion
New User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 24
That looks like a 351C 4v intake to me
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 04:19 PM
  #9  
mark a.'s Avatar
mark a.
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,924
Likes: 153
Originally Posted by Mil1ion
That looks like a 351C 4v intake to me
Not a chance Mil, thats why the tape is on there. It's the 3rd one on Ebay I've seen through the years.
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #10  
Thunderjet4x4's Avatar
Thunderjet4x4
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Could be some odd aussie setup? 78REDFORD, I'd recommend an edelbrock 600 cfm, easy to tune, gaskets are above the fuel level(no power valve blow outs), and all around good daily driver carbs. 4v will always be more efficient if you don't keep the secondarys hammered alot due to the nice small primarys which are way smaller than any 2v I have seen. Not sure of the new hollys, but the old ones were very finicky, need reset alot, leaked, and would blow the power valve on just about any backfire-tho with patience made good drag racing carbs. I know of a few friends who switched from old holleys to an old or new edelbrock/carter and were very happy.
Good luck!
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 04:56 PM
  #11  
Mil1ion's Avatar
Mil1ion
New User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 24
What are ALL the casting numbers on it then ?

Please post them
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 10:48 PM
  #12  
ErrorS's Avatar
ErrorS
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
I can tell by looking at it that it's too wide to be a 351C intake.. doesn't mean it isnt' some old aftermarket intake or something.

Also, there have been some rare trucks asked about on here.. special fleet options and whatnot, couldn't they have made intakes for large special orders? or possibly a 4v option they were toying with near the engines end of life that never really hit the gruond (or brochures)

sucks there wasn't internet (as we know it) in the 1970s
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 05:44 AM
  #13  
78REDFORD's Avatar
78REDFORD
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Rossville, IN
Originally Posted by Thunderjet4x4
Could be some odd aussie setup? 78REDFORD, I'd recommend an edelbrock 600 cfm, easy to tune, gaskets are above the fuel level(no power valve blow outs), and all around good daily driver carbs. 4v will always be more efficient if you don't keep the secondarys hammered alot due to the nice small primarys which are way smaller than any 2v I have seen. Not sure of the new hollys, but the old ones were very finicky, need reset alot, leaked, and would blow the power valve on just about any backfire-tho with patience made good drag racing carbs. I know of a few friends who switched from old holleys to an old or new edelbrock/carter and were very happy.
Good luck!
Thanks Thunderjet4x4......Your the second one to offer that advice. I not even going to pretend to know much about carb tuning - so the simpler the better for me. I'll check into the Edlebrock 4V setup ( about $250 at Napa) and see how it works out for me!
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 07:10 AM
  #14  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by mark a.
Never say never ! Factory 4V Ford 400 intakes have poped up on Ebay through the years.



I have every Ford car & truck parts catalog that pertains to 400 engines from 1971 thru 1982.

NONE list a 4V intake manifold or a 4V carb for a 400.

The Muscle Parts Catalogs don't show a 4V 400 intake manifold, either.

What is the Ford casting number shown on this supposed 400 4V intake manifold.

What is the Ford ID engineering number from that EGR spacer plate?

The spacer plate upper/lower gaskets also have Ford ID numbers on them.

1965/72 & 1973/79 Ford Passenger Car Parts Catalogs / Section 93 / 9433-Gasket Set, Intake Manifold.

D0AZ-9433-B .. Intake Manifold Gasket Set / Fits: 1970/74 351C 2V.

D0AZ-9433-A .. Intake Manifold Gasket Set / Fits 1970/74 351C 4V.

D1AZ-9433-A .. Intake Manifold Gasket Set / Fits: 1971/74 400 2V.

Where's the intake gasket set for a 400 4V? You won't find one because none exists.

The large secondaries on the EGR plate are exactly the same as used on 1973/74 351C 4V's

The intake manifold looks exactly like the one used on 351C 4V's.

351C, 351M and 400 engines all look identical.

Both have the 8 bolt valve covers, no timing cover, and the fuel pump mounting bolts at 12 and 6 o'clock.

Look around...anywhere, see if you can find a FoMoCo VIN engine code for a 400 4V. You can't because there isn't one.

1973/74: H = 351C 2V / Q = 351C 4V / S = 400 2V. That's it.

I was a Ford partsman for 35 years, so I'm not someone who thinks a 400 4V manifold exists, just because they saw one advertised on ebay!

THERE'S NO SUCH THING!
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 04:43 PM
  #15  
mark a.'s Avatar
mark a.
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,924
Likes: 153
I just showed you the proof. This has been disgused before here. There isn't any sense in argueing, the picture speaks for it's self. A cast iron 4v manifold would not be a aftermarket manifold. The fact of the matter is Ford did produce some of them for what ever reason regardless what your manuals say.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE