When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
They weren't the cheapest ones, and frankly they were only going to be in the truck for a max of three days. In fact i even told my brother that i hated NAPA joints because they break (three previous cars have had NAPA brand due to immediate need, and they have all broke), but they have all lasted at least a month. At this point i am really just trying to make sure that nothing else could of happened, and that this happened due to bad parts. I am curious though, what brand would you get if you needed some u-joints now, and could not get spicers?
if you get a ujoints with out the zirk fitting they tend to be stronger. if the hubs were locked and he was driving faster then 55 that could have been the cause coupled with the drivline not be balanced to the slip joint not being greased up if that makes sense
if the front drive shaft isnt balanced or say the slip joint that allows in/out travel of the drive shaft is worn out as it spins up faster it will get out of round easier causing stress on ujoints. i know my front drive line is worn out slip shaft or what ever its called.
well lets see, front hubs, locked.. dry pavement.... then a big BANG...
Hubs should always be unlocked when not in use. regardless of transfer case placement,
you had it in 2wd, but the hubs were locked , which means the whole assembly was turning all the way to the transfer case, and free wheeled.
the front driveshafts and parts are not designed to do highway speeds. SO, it went bang for a reason.
The only difference was you didn't have the 4wd engaged to turn the front with the motor. but the whole assembly still turned. Always unlock, and check them to be sure.
napa joints are fine. you abused it and the whole driveline.
th ujoint did as it was supposed to do, it let go, as designed to keep from breaking those more expensive parts.
have you priced a 44 chunk lately? labor alone would cost 350...
Napa ujoints work fine, it is the user.
Last edited by AEROSTAR ALIVE; Jan 26, 2008 at 12:34 PM.
When I lived in Canada. (for ten years) I would lock the hubs every fall and not unlock them till spring. (I would unlock them on a 200 mile trip) but I drove them at 70 MPH many times and never had an issue with the u-joints. The only part that is not desined to run at hyway is the transfer case. That chain really gets humming. But even that will do it ocasionally.
When I lived in Canada. (for ten years) I would lock the hubs every fall and not unlock them till spring. (I would unlock them on a 200 mile trip) but I drove them at 70 MPH many times and never had an issue with the u-joints. The only part that is not desined to run at hyway is the transfer case. That chain really gets humming. But even that will do it ocasionally.
Absolutely. The above post is nonsense. You can lock your hubs in and drive around as much and as fast as you want and you won't hurt a thing. I also do this all time and don't have any problems.
well lets see, front hubs, locked.. dry pavement.... then a big BANG...
Hubs should always be unlocked when not in use. regardless of transfer case placement,
you had it in 2wd, but the hubs were locked , which means the whole assembly was turning all the way to the transfer case, and free wheeled.
the front driveshafts and parts are not designed to do highway speeds. SO, it went bang for a reason.
The only difference was you didn't have the 4wd engaged to turn the front with the motor. but the whole assembly still turned. Always unlock, and check them to be sure.
napa joints are fine. you abused it and the whole driveline.
th ujoint did as it was supposed to do, it let go, as designed to keep from breaking those more expensive parts.
have you priced a 44 chunk lately? labor alone would cost 350...
Napa ujoints work fine, it is the user.
I disagree with Aerostar. You can lock the hubs in the fall and unlock them in the spring. As Helirich and Andym said, the transfer case can't take it - that's why it is part time. I do the same exact thing with my Bronco, and I have never had a problem with the front driveline.
On top of all that, I wouldn't expect a big bang from the truck when it has an open front differential and the transfer case in 2 Hi. The u-joints are pretty much the same as the rear driveline, so why couldn't they take a freeway spin? Since the truck in question belongs to my brother, I personally took a look at the carnage, and the U-joint was a piece of garbage. It literally fell apart, no signs of tearing the metal (not counting all the stuff around it that got beat to a pulp) just a near clean break, which is an indication of a brittle fracture - where a piece of metal just snaps well below its rated load.
well lets see, front hubs, locked.. dry pavement.... then a big BANG...
Hubs should always be unlocked when not in use. regardless of transfer case placement,
you had it in 2wd, but the hubs were locked , which means the whole assembly was turning all the way to the transfer case, and free wheeled.
the front driveshafts and parts are not designed to do highway speeds. SO, it went bang for a reason.
The only difference was you didn't have the 4wd engaged to turn the front with the motor. but the whole assembly still turned. Always unlock, and check them to be sure.
napa joints are fine. you abused it and the whole driveline.
th ujoint did as it was supposed to do, it let go, as designed to keep from breaking those more expensive parts.
have you priced a 44 chunk lately? labor alone would cost 350...
Napa ujoints work fine, it is the user.
User error is possible if this was a one time thing, or maybe even the first time i had replaced u-joints, however it isn't. I previously stated that NAPA brand u-joints have broken on some of my other cars. Face it, they are CRAP, not my fault you like them, but you make it sound as if you are NAPA employee. Don't worry though, i realized by reading some of your past posts that you tend to assume much and jump to conclusions quite quickly. So I have no problem that you assumed user error, it is, after all, the way you do things. (I am curious however, as to how you thought that your intake maniforld gasket got sucked into your intake? for a person that promotes his mechanical skills for a fee, one would think that you would know the difference between engine pinging [faulty wires?] and a partialy missing intake gasket.)
In the future before denouncing someone i have a bit of advice "Think first, Then speak"
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.