Maximum CR
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,270
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
You will probably get away with 89 Octane in cool weather, if you run a 180 degree tstat. In hot weather or if you are in heavy traffic you will need 91+ octane.
Are your pistons zero deck, with a dish, or are they flattops 'down the hole'?
If they are zero deck, you will have quench, and will be able to get away with 89 Octane under most conditions.
Are your pistons zero deck, with a dish, or are they flattops 'down the hole'?
If they are zero deck, you will have quench, and will be able to get away with 89 Octane under most conditions.
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 190
Likes: 40
Originally Posted by danlee
You will probably get away with 89 Octane in cool weather, if you run a 180 degree tstat. In hot weather or if you are in heavy traffic you will need 91+ octane.
Are your pistons zero deck, with a dish, or are they flattops 'down the hole'?
If they are zero deck, you will have quench, and will be able to get away with 89 Octane under most conditions.
Are your pistons zero deck, with a dish, or are they flattops 'down the hole'?
If they are zero deck, you will have quench, and will be able to get away with 89 Octane under most conditions.
Thanks for the information.
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,270
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
You want a set of zero deck pistons from Tim Meyer. They will allow quench which will help to reduce detonation. You should be able to go to the light side of 9.5:1 CR and get by with 89 with Aussie heads and zero deck pistons.
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
From: western montana
Listen close folks, as you know I just built that basic engine with aus heads, tims kb pistons and 9.5:1 ( what is atuallymore like 9.3 +-) I use the roller cam that is just a bit later IVC...not much diferent than the 255 and more forgiving if i remember correctly... I have to run retarded with 91 and lucas additive. The dynamic is pretty high with the 255 and even with quench heads and the right pistons there is no freaking way I'd go with that cam. And if you run into the 3k rpm range on the road it isnt the best cam anyway. Using the DEH 255 I'd not go over 9:1 CR.
Maybe I'm doing something wrong but even the basic guide states 95 + octane for that build...right? Hope my memory isn't going with the paint thinner i've been using lately. I'm still looking to propane the thing someday....need parts
Maybe I'm doing something wrong but even the basic guide states 95 + octane for that build...right? Hope my memory isn't going with the paint thinner i've been using lately. I'm still looking to propane the thing someday....need parts
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
mr roger, paul. for what it is worth, it is always good to hear from you in our house.
regaurdless of the issue and or the subject matter. we like your level headed stlyle, as always, it is about the MOTOR, carry on, these hillbillys are LISTENING. good luck in OUGHT 8.
quietely and respesctfully.
paul &nick kiernan berwyn MD.
regaurdless of the issue and or the subject matter. we like your level headed stlyle, as always, it is about the MOTOR, carry on, these hillbillys are LISTENING. good luck in OUGHT 8.
quietely and respesctfully.
paul &nick kiernan berwyn MD.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 190
Likes: 40
Originally Posted by roger dowty
Listen close folks, as you know I just built that basic engine with aus heads, tims kb pistons and 9.5:1 ( what is atuallymore like 9.3 +-) I use the roller cam that is just a bit later IVC...not much diferent than the 255 and more forgiving if i remember correctly... I have to run retarded with 91 and lucas additive. The dynamic is pretty high with the 255 and even with quench heads and the right pistons there is no freaking way I'd go with that cam. And if you run into the 3k rpm range on the road it isnt the best cam anyway. Using the DEH 255 I'd not go over 9:1 CR.
Maybe I'm doing something wrong but even the basic guide states 95 + octane for that build...right? Hope my memory isn't going with the paint thinner i've been using lately. I'm still looking to propane the thing someday....need parts
Maybe I'm doing something wrong but even the basic guide states 95 + octane for that build...right? Hope my memory isn't going with the paint thinner i've been using lately. I'm still looking to propane the thing someday....need parts
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026
Brett Foote
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time
Joe Kucinski
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,270
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
According to my calculations 9.3:1 static in a 400 with a 255DEH cam will give you 8.02:1 Dynamic CR. This should be OK with 91 Octane and Aussie heads with quench.
Look at www.edyno.com
Look at www.edyno.com
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gman97005
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
15
Jan 23, 2016 11:55 AM
1978Crew
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
13
Oct 17, 2010 07:30 AM
zsir
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
6
Feb 14, 2003 10:22 AM