How many horses?
Thread Starter
|
"Mifflin Clay"
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,177
Likes: 4
From: Mifflin, PA
How many horses?
How many horses does the V10 have? The Superduty brochure says 362, the Ford Fleet website says:
<table id="tablegeneral" border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr bgcolor="#cccccc"><th colspan="2"> Engine Type - 8th Position </th></tr> <tr><td>VIN Code:</td><td>Y</td></tr> <tr><td>Engine:</td><td>6.8 L </td></tr> <tr><td>Cylinders:</td><td>10 </td></tr> <tr><td>Fuel:</td><td>Gasoline </td></tr> <tr><td>Horsepower:</td><td>305 HORSEPOWER </td></tr> <!-- Section for position 10 --> <tr bgcolor="#cccccc"><th colspan="2"> Model Year - 10th Position </th></tr> <tr><td>VIN Code:</td><td>8</td></tr></tbody></table>Typo? Found decoder here:https://www.fleet.ford.com/maintenan...ls/default.asp
<table id="tablegeneral" border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr bgcolor="#cccccc"><th colspan="2"> Engine Type - 8th Position </th></tr> <tr><td>VIN Code:</td><td>Y</td></tr> <tr><td>Engine:</td><td>6.8 L </td></tr> <tr><td>Cylinders:</td><td>10 </td></tr> <tr><td>Fuel:</td><td>Gasoline </td></tr> <tr><td>Horsepower:</td><td>305 HORSEPOWER </td></tr> <!-- Section for position 10 --> <tr bgcolor="#cccccc"><th colspan="2"> Model Year - 10th Position </th></tr> <tr><td>VIN Code:</td><td>8</td></tr></tbody></table>Typo? Found decoder here:https://www.fleet.ford.com/maintenan...ls/default.asp
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,237
Likes: 22
From: Florida
For your viewing pleasure...here are the 2V HP/Trq curves for model years 2000 and later V10s (i.e. NOT 3V)
I do not have a curve for the 3V but the data says (Output is 362 hp @ 4750 RPM and 457 ft·lbf @ 3250 RPM)
I do not have a curve for the 3V but the data says (Output is 362 hp @ 4750 RPM and 457 ft·lbf @ 3250 RPM)
Last edited by X_Hemi_Guy; Nov 15, 2007 at 11:12 AM.
Trending Topics
Sit. Stay.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 20
From: Washington State
That's obviously not a "correct" dyno chart since torque and HP only cross as 5252RPM. It's more like a graph representation. Still yet, good post Joe. 
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer
Joe Kucinski
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,237
Likes: 22
From: Florida
I believe (maybe incorrectly) that the leftmost graph line is actually 1000RPMs and not 0 thus they cross at ~4000 since peak Trq is 3250rpm...thoughts?
I could be mistaken though...in my interpretation of the data...
joe.
I could be mistaken though...in my interpretation of the data...
joe.
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
From: High Point, NC
But none of this 2v vs 3v stuff should really matter to us X owners, since the 3v was never offered in the Excursion.
2005 Specs
- 6,754 cc 6.8 liters V 10 front engine with 90.2 mm bore, 105.7 mm stroke, 9 compression ratio, overhead cam and two valves per cylinder 99S
Power: 231 kW , 310 HP SAE @ 4,250 rpm; 425 ft lb , 576 Nm @ 3,250 rpm
2005 Specs
- 6,754 cc 6.8 liters V 10 front engine with 90.2 mm bore, 105.7 mm stroke, 9 compression ratio, overhead cam and two valves per cylinder 99S
Power: 231 kW , 310 HP SAE @ 4,250 rpm; 425 ft lb , 576 Nm @ 3,250 rpm
Last edited by MarkMoore; Nov 15, 2007 at 11:57 AM.
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,237
Likes: 22
From: Florida
Originally Posted by MarkMoore
But none of this 2v vs 3v stuff should really matter to us X owners, since the 3v was never offered in the Excursion.
Sit. Stay.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 20
From: Washington State
Originally Posted by X_Hemi_Guy
And that makes me mad, pissed, confused, and ultimately SICK that we DIDN'T!!!
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,237
Likes: 22
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Monsta
Personally, I would rather have the Torqshift over the 3V if I had to choose between the two. Wish they woulda done that.
The 4 speed is 'okay' ... BUT 1st and 2nd are spaced WAY too far apart.
The 3V from what I hear from my buds that have them prefers a slightly lower RPM (3000) as the 'low' spot for power over the 2V (3200)...that makes a big difference when pulling heavy on a steep grade...
BUT I guess the torque shift with the tow/haul mode alone could be more beneficial...all I know is those extra ~22ft-lbs of torque and 52HP would be nice to have sometimes!...so for me it would be a toss up I guess as I see both having advantages...but BOTH together...man that would have been killer in the EX!!!
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
From: High Point, NC
I'm like Monsta - if I had the choice I'd choose the Torque shift. I think the raw HP/TQ difference between the 2v and 3v are minimal - the HP/TQ 'at the wheels' difference is probably delivered from the Torque Shift tranny.