Notices

'66 Q code vs. Police Interceptor ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #1  
Dave Severson's Avatar
Dave Severson
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
'66 Q code vs. Police Interceptor ???

Hey guys, what a great day!!!!! Just came up with a 428 Police Interceptor aluminum factory intake!!!! I know the PI option made a lot more power then the Q code 428 in my T-bird so the question is, what other changes were there in the PI engine? Cam and compression I'm sure, but was there anything else unique to the PI engine that gave it such a huge horsepower increase? Or were the guys at Ford just fibbing a bit and under-rating the HP and Torque on the Q code engine????

(Not that a reputable company like Ford would have ever under-rated the horsepower numbers just to keep the front office and insurance companies happy!!!)
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 12:37 AM
  #2  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
The "Q" 428 was rated at 345 hp@4600 and the PI was rated at 360 @ 5400. Both engines used the standard 390/428 heads. Some of the PI's were suppose to have mechanical cams but I never saw one or heard of anyone else that saw one. Most had the 390GT/428CJ cam. Then of course there was the aluminum intake.
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 12:54 AM
  #3  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Bear 45/70
The "Q" 428 was rated at 345 hp@4600 and the PI was rated at 360 @ 5400. Both engines used the standard 390/428 heads. Some of the PI's were suppose to have mechanical cams but I never saw one or heard of anyone else that saw one. Most had the 390GT/428CJ cam. Then of course there was the aluminum intake.
Parts catalog sez only the 1963/65 390 P/C's had mechanical lifters, the block is 1963/65 only: C3AZ-6010-Y.

No mechanical lifters are listed for 67/70 428 P/C's, but are listed for 1966.

1966 428 P/C camshaft: C3AZ-6250-D ~ Marked: VB between last lobe and last journal.

The 1963/65 390's P/C cam is: C3AZ-6250-T ~ Marked: VAA.

The P/C engine code: P was used on the following: 1965/66 390 P/C; 1966/70 428 P/C; 1971/72 429 P/C.

btw: Ford never called these engines police interceptors in the parts catalogs, they were called P/C's = police cruisers.
 

Last edited by NumberDummy; Nov 7, 2007 at 01:17 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 01:04 AM
  #4  
Dave Severson's Avatar
Dave Severson
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
Originally Posted by Bear 45/70
The "Q" 428 was rated at 345 hp@4600 and the PI was rated at 360 @ 5400. Both engines used the standard 390/428 heads. Some of the PI's were suppose to have mechanical cams but I never saw one or heard of anyone else that saw one. Most had the 390GT/428CJ cam. Then of course there was the aluminum intake.
The biggest difference is in the torque numbers, the PI is rated at 459 ft. lbs. at 3200 and the Q was rated at 362 ft. lbs. at 2800.---- Could the cam and PI intake account for that huge of a jump in torque, or was Ford doctoring the numbers....or is my source just a typo on the torque numbers??? I guess it's just hard for me to believe a cam and intake change was good for 97 ft. lbs. increase.... What am I missing????
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 01:22 AM
  #5  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
I have the HP figures, but not the torque figures:

Q code rated at 345 HP / P code rated at 360 HP.
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #6  
bryyce62's Avatar
bryyce62
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Northern CA
Club FTE Silver Member

Without going off track too much, what are mechaincal lifters/cams?
Similar to a roller cam/lifters maybe?

gw
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 10:45 AM
  #7  
68FE390's Avatar
68FE390
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Lyman, SC
Originally Posted by bryyce62
Without going off track too much, what are mechaincal lifters/cams?
Similar to a roller cam/lifters maybe?

gw
Mechaincal lifters or cams are solid lift cams, the lifters are not built up with oil like a hydrallic lifter they are just solid. The lift doesn't vary any it is always the same lift all the time.
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #8  
bryyce62's Avatar
bryyce62
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Northern CA
Club FTE Silver Member

Gotcha,
I've heard of solid lifters & cams, just never heard them referred to as mechanical.
Learned something new today.....


Originally Posted by 68FE390
Mechaincal lifters or cams are solid lift cams, the lifters are not built up with oil like a hydrallic lifter they are just solid. The lift doesn't vary any it is always the same lift all the time.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #9  
dbossman's Avatar
dbossman
Tuned
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 286
Likes: 32
Typo

Originally Posted by Dave Severson
The biggest difference is in the torque numbers, the PI is rated at 459 ft. lbs. at 3200 and the Q was rated at 362 ft. lbs. at 2800.---- Could the cam and PI intake account for that huge of a jump in torque, or was Ford doctoring the numbers....or is my source just a typo on the torque numbers??? I guess it's just hard for me to believe a cam and intake change was good for 97 ft. lbs. increase.... What am I missing????
I pulled a 428 from a 66 Merc S-55 and put it into my F250.

The documentation I have for it shows: 345hp @ 4600 and 462 @ 2800 for torque.

Tim
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 02:56 PM
  #10  
FFR428's Avatar
FFR428
Needsmorecoffee.
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 2
From: CT
Club FTE Silver Member

Hi Dave!

There was a solid lifter 428PI. Not very many tho and some of these went into the 427 street Cobra's in 66 and 67 leftovers. They had the C6AE-R heads and cast exhaust manifolds. True that most were hyd lifter blocks like the 67 Shelby's used with the C7AE-A heads. I've been witness to one solid lifter PI block out of a 66 street car so some did exsist although rare. And I've never seen another. The PI engines in the Cobra's had a few tweeks and were listed at 390hp/475tq. The C3AZ-6250-D was indeed a solid lifter cam used from the earlier 427s. Comp ratio listed at 10.0:1. The 67 Shelby PI was rated at 355hp/420tq. These used the hyd GT/CJ cam. HP and TQ figures vary slightly depending on the source. I have 3 different listings for both PI's. So I guess it would depend on which version of the PI engine your comparing to and what source listed it. They are all fairly close tho.

Nice score on the PI intake Dave. Was this on the 428 in your bird? What heads are attached to that pup? BTW a 67 date code correct 428 is worth a fortune to the Shelby crowd these days. You could easily sell and get the 427 block and some other goodies you've been after. The PI intake alone is worth $750++ if in decent shape. The Cougar GT-E guys would be after that PI also if it's the C7-F casting.

Something else...if this engine is out of the car please look at the back of the block and tell me if there is a "S" hand made sandscratch. You'd be looking at 427 cyl walls and crossbolt bosses cast in if so.

G.
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 05:15 PM
  #11  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
My book says the

"Q" motor is 345 @ 4600 and 462 @ 2800 and
the PI was 360 @ 5400 and 459 @ 3200 while
the CJ was 335 @ 5200 and 440 @ 3400.

Cam and intake would account for the differences easy.
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #12  
Dave Severson's Avatar
Dave Severson
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
Originally Posted by Bear 45/70
My book says the

"Q" motor is 345 @ 4600 and 462 @ 2800 and
the PI was 360 @ 5400 and 459 @ 3200 while
the CJ was 335 @ 5200 and 440 @ 3400.

Cam and intake would account for the differences easy.
Hmmm. Different specs on the Q code then I had... Thanks Bear! appreciate the help!
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 09:32 PM
  #13  
Dave Severson's Avatar
Dave Severson
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
Originally Posted by FFR428
Hi Dave!

There was a solid lifter 428PI. Not very many tho and some of these went into the 427 street Cobra's in 66 and 67 leftovers. They had the C6AE-R heads and cast exhaust manifolds. True that most were hyd lifter blocks like the 67 Shelby's used with the C7AE-A heads. I've been witness to one solid lifter PI block out of a 66 street car so some did exsist although rare. And I've never seen another. The PI engines in the Cobra's had a few tweeks and were listed at 390hp/475tq. The C3AZ-6250-D was indeed a solid lifter cam used from the earlier 427s. Comp ratio listed at 10.0:1. The 67 Shelby PI was rated at 355hp/420tq. These used the hyd GT/CJ cam. HP and TQ figures vary slightly depending on the source. I have 3 different listings for both PI's. So I guess it would depend on which version of the PI engine your comparing to and what source listed it. They are all fairly close tho.

Nice score on the PI intake Dave. Was this on the 428 in your bird? What heads are attached to that pup? BTW a 67 date code correct 428 is worth a fortune to the Shelby crowd these days. You could easily sell and get the 427 block and some other goodies you've been after. The PI intake alone is worth $750++ if in decent shape. The Cougar GT-E guys would be after that PI also if it's the C7-F casting.

Something else...if this engine is out of the car please look at the back of the block and tell me if there is a "S" hand made sandscratch. You'd be looking at 427 cyl walls and crossbolt bosses cast in if so.

G.
Thanks G. Still so dang busy on customer stuff that unfortunately the "Bird" is still sitting beside the shop untouched since I brought it home!!!! The PI intake wasn't on the Bird, friend of mine (bought my rollback couple years ago) discovered it in the trunk of a car he had hauled in. Whenever any rare or unusual Ford parts show up in his travels, I always get first shot at them. I won't even tell you what I paid for it, but it was very, very cheap!!!!!

I still would like to start with a Genesis block, have to see what sort of goodies I come up with to sell before I get started on a couple of my own projects this winter... I just need more time, better health, or some good help!!!!! Some other business considerations have surfaced now, so that is eating into my time, also..... Maybe next week???? I will let ya know what the Bird engine really is when I get it out. Want to do some modernizing on the induction and ignition, so some of the parts will be excess. You're the expert, so I'll give ya first shot on whatever I find... Thanks for all the help!!!!!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigfoot22
Y-Block V8 (239, 272, 292, 312, 317, 341, 368)
8
Apr 28, 2010 10:54 AM
LaredoF350
Manitoba / Saskatchewan Chapter
39
May 20, 2007 10:49 PM
LaredoF350
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
15
May 14, 2007 06:16 AM
obey_your_master
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
9
Oct 18, 2006 10:08 AM
1975 f150 360
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
1
Oct 12, 2003 08:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE