Notices

solid lifter cams in 351m/400??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 05:41 AM
  #1  
father/son's Avatar
father/son
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
solid lifter cams in 351m/400??

anyone else running a solid flat tappet cam?? with what results??
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 05:08 PM
  #2  
MBDiagMan's Avatar
MBDiagMan
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 3
From: NE Texas
I just can't imagine why anyone would want to run a solid lifter cam in such a low RPM engine as this.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 05:35 PM
  #3  
hollenjoe's Avatar
hollenjoe
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 1
I still dont get why people say a 400 cant be built for high rpm, I has to be possible...
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 07:43 PM
  #4  
danlee's Avatar
danlee
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,270
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
Originally Posted by hollenjoe
I still dont get why people say a 400 cant be built for high rpm, I has to be possible...
I think that it is possible to get higher RPM out of a 400 or 434, but consider that a 434 will draw as much air at 5000 RPM as a 351 at 6200 RPM. So in order to get 6200 RPM out of a 434, you need the equivalent air as a 351 at 8000 RPM.

How can you get that much air? If you use 351C-4V heads and build an intake like a 351C that revs to 8000 RPM, you are on your way. One problem is you need a dual quad Tunnel Ram manifold. You will have to adapt one from a 351C.

The exhaust has the same problem. You need large tube headers to handle that amount of exhaust gas.

A 400 is not quite as bad, but you can see what I mean.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 11:04 PM
  #5  
hollenjoe's Avatar
hollenjoe
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 1
jaja yeah I know, thats kinda the advertised rpm range that a cam gives, its usually 1000rpm under...
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 12:31 AM
  #6  
roger dowty's Avatar
roger dowty
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
From: western montana
I think you take a wheezer stroker crank like that crazy ozzie and then get the parts to take.... what did he say.... 40 pounds off the rotating assembly? some god awful amount...that way your not making GOBS of destructive rotating energy... then get the heads, chi intake, custom headers - theres cams a plenty and go cat go.

My goal one day is to make a turbo- (not blown) 400 that will take 8k and run 7's consistently...then turn it loose on the word ...one victim at a time....to include 460 gurus. I might even do it with a 400c as well...and with a clevor 400 and and and.

air supply is fixable as it is a freaking cleveland and if any ford base can make flow it's a cleveland...the real issue IMHO is getting rid of the destructive rotating mass... it's energy that is spenging it's time doing naughty things that rob power and longevity.

I need some really dumb rich guy to back me...i show him/her how to throw away mass quantities of money in a don trump kind of way....
 

Last edited by roger dowty; Oct 25, 2007 at 12:34 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 09:32 AM
  #7  
father/son's Avatar
father/son
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
with an engine built as such:

400 ford

headers
600cfm edelbrock
performer 400 intake
crane roller rocker conversion w/ guideplates
tim's 9.5:1 k/b hyperutec
engine blueprinted
properly balanced
2v heads
cam bearings restricted

http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Search/CamDetails.asp?PartNumber=32-237-4

would this cam with matching springs not be suitable?? or even this cam

http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Search/CamDetails.asp?PartNumber=32-238-4

not only would the mechanical lifters not need as much oil to function, but the rpm capability would be increased...


i agree with you roger...G forces kill an engine
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 10:07 AM
  #8  
hollenjoe's Avatar
hollenjoe
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 1
Im planning to go roller to but why aint there double profile cams (int and ext diff duration)? 400 likes them, aint a single profile cam worse?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 04:07 PM
  #9  
MBDiagMan's Avatar
MBDiagMan
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 3
From: NE Texas
Crane makes split profile roller cams.

roger is all over it here. The issue is the large amount of rotating mass. More accurately as he puts it, "destructive rotating mass."

I have no doubt that, given the funds, a 400 could be made into a fire breather, but WHY? There are many other engines that are more suited to the task without having to spend so much money and do so much custom work. The 400 is well suited to be built to pull your boat, your stock trailer or a set of big, heavy tires.

Why not use the 400 for what it is best suited? You would no more use a Ferrari to haul gravel than you would use a dump truck to go road racing. Match the equipment to the task at hand.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 08:29 AM
  #10  
father/son's Avatar
father/son
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
hi doc,paul and nick here, to be fair to you, we did not tell the whole story. we are with you on rpm. nick has a msd rev limiter where we intend to hold that 400 well below 6000, more like 5400 max we are thinking maybe even 5000. the solid lifter cam was more about oiling issues. we paid our machine guy to do tim meyers mods. ie oil restrictors. not only did he agree he advised us to take it one step further and run solids so we do not have to feed the lifter galleys. aka more oil to our crank and less oil up stairs. this is what we are asking about. we just did not make it clear. our fault. any body you to doc. any thoughts. later us.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 08:55 AM
  #11  
father/son's Avatar
father/son
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
roger and doc, me again, listen this is not a how to from me. this is for pure fun, dreamboat annie stuff. the thruth is as i see both of get it. for what? and to what end and dont forget about the DUMB rich guy. MY checkbook aint that big. but for pure FUN. my thoughts on a 8000 400 MAYBE.
deep pan
windage tray
high side b clearences
forged crank porkchop counterweights
10" alum flywheel
alum rods
lighest strongest slugs you could find
SOLID roller lifters
strongest lightest pushrods around
proper clearenced beehive springs
titanium retainers
valves rockers 3/8 screw in studs jomar girdle dont want that bill$$$$$$$ out of room
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 09:37 AM
  #12  
danlee's Avatar
danlee
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,270
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
the solid lifter cam was more about oiling issues. we paid our machine guy to do tim meyers mods. ie oil restrictors. not only did he agree he advised us to take it one step further and run solids so we do not have to feed the lifter galleys.

The oiling problems are related to the cam bearings, not the lifters or lifter galleries. I don't think that you will get much oiling advantage with a solid lifter cam. Tim's oiling mod should be sufficient, because it limits the oil to the cam bearings etc.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 10:24 AM
  #13  
73XAFalcon's Avatar
73XAFalcon
Elder User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Sin City, USA
Originally Posted by roger dowty
I think you take a wheezer stroker crank like that crazy ozzie and then get the parts to take.... what did he say.... 40 pounds off the rotating assembly? some god awful amount...that way your not making GOBS of destructive rotating energy... then get the heads, chi intake, custom headers - theres cams a plenty and go cat go.
I'm not an ozzie, I grew up on a bayou.....my dad was 1/2 N. Louisiana Redneck and 1/2 Coon-*** while my mom was a little PA Dutch farmer from central PA
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 10:29 AM
  #14  
father/son's Avatar
father/son
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
danlee paul i here you sir we are ALWAYS open to op,s on this unusual oil system that these midlands present. as i have always said, we are here to learn, and listen to those who have gone before us. NOT to teach anybody this is NOT our first motor. it IS our first MIDLAND, anything more, you have our ear. not a smart a-- i am serious. this forumn is full of men who have been there done that. talk to us we think we get it.
thanks us.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #15  
73XAFalcon's Avatar
73XAFalcon
Elder User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Sin City, USA
Originally Posted by MBDiagMan
Why not use the 400 for what it is best suited? You would no more use a Ferrari to haul gravel than you would use a dump truck to go road racing. Match the equipment to the task at hand.
Then why build ANY motor? A 400 is no more specifically a truck motor than a 390. In fact both started out as car motors.

The 5.4mod motor is used only in trucks in the US but in Australia the 5.4 is used in the 4 door Falcon GT. It is electronically rev limited to around 6K but with its 4.17" stroke (longer than a 400's) it makes 302Kw (403HP) in the 2008 Cobra and 290Kw (390HP) in the GT.

The BOSS 290/302 5.4 motors (the Aussie name) are good for more than 6K so should Ford AU just forget using that truck motor for anything other than pulling jet skis and bass boats? A motor is a motor and although some traits make one motor easier to build for certain applications than another motor it still doesn't mean you can't build that motor for what ever application you choose.

My 408 has no problems hitting 6500 rpm and it has no lack of torque for it's 3400lbs application. It also helps that I use a 5spd manual instead of a power robbing slushbox. A 3.27:1 first gear is a lot nicer than a 2.48:1 coupled to a torque converter.....it also provides an extra 25% of torque multiplication.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE