my 1st engine build
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,876
Likes: 0
From: Hollister MO
my 1st engine build
well I'm starting my first engine build I chose a 289 because it will fit in most of the ford cars i like. not sure if I'm going to keep it a 289 or make it a 302.
my block casting # are
C6AE-6015-C
makes it a 65-68 289
6 bolt bell housing
bore 4.00
deck 8.206
head casting #
C80E
MAKES THEM
68 289 OR 302
63.CC
valve diameter
in 1.67"
exh1.45
I finished all the tear down to day hope to sent to the shop on Tuesday.
from there i will post what i find.
my block casting # are
C6AE-6015-C
makes it a 65-68 289
6 bolt bell housing
bore 4.00
deck 8.206
head casting #
C80E
MAKES THEM
68 289 OR 302
63.CC
valve diameter
in 1.67"
exh1.45
I finished all the tear down to day hope to sent to the shop on Tuesday.
from there i will post what i find.
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,876
Likes: 0
From: Hollister MO
The 289 was crap.
The block is good it has no cracks. it however has to be bored over a least .30
The crank is bad the 2nd and 4th mains are bad
Rods have to be resized.
Well since the crank and rods need repair, i will get a 302 crank and rods.
For now I will wait to see if some thing comes along.
The block is good it has no cracks. it however has to be bored over a least .30
The crank is bad the 2nd and 4th mains are bad
Rods have to be resized.
Well since the crank and rods need repair, i will get a 302 crank and rods.
For now I will wait to see if some thing comes along.
Cargo Master
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 424
From: Too close to Houston
If you have to get a crank anyway, why not consider a stroker kit? I know a 302 can be taken up to 347 cubic inches. I'm not sure what you can do with a 289. Lut us know how it turns out.
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: CANADA
Just a note, I think the 68 302 and 289 heads were different in ccs. 68 289 were low compression 63cc approx, and 302s were around 53cc. recomend 331 stroker, theyre more cost effective and increased longevity over a 347.
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: CANADA
Originally Posted by pintoches
i have the 63cc heads the casting #C80E are for the 289 or 302 in 68
Trending Topics
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 30
From: Maple Valley, WA
Originally Posted by BEWOLD
Just a note, I think the 68 302 and 289 heads were different in ccs. 68 289 were low compression 63cc approx, and 302s were around 53cc. recomend 331 stroker, theyre more cost effective and increased longevity over a 347.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer