When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
That temp chart above is as useful as the dealer mentioned above! Both are worse than useless.
That chart MIGHT have been right with 1960's type ATFs and seals. It isn't even close to being right with modern transmissions and ATFs.
You can go up to 250F for a half hour at a time with NO damage. Above 250 you are getting to a place where you don't want your trans to go. For steardy state operation you shouldn't go over 220F.
These temps are in the pan or test port. The temps in the line to the cooler is going to be hotter.
That temp chart above is as useful as the dealer mentioned above! Both are worse than useless.
Do you have some reference information to support this claim? Or is this just your opinion? If you do any research you'll find that most of the information available states that ATF begins to varnish at about 240 degrees. Varnish builds up on automatic transmission parts and quickly begins to affect performance. I am sure there are many variables that can affect this to some degree (synthetic fluids, age of fluids, etc) but the consensus says going over 240 is not desirable.
Maybe some homework would be in order before you make such statements.
Last edited by EpicCowlick; Aug 22, 2007 at 09:22 AM.
My 18+ years as a transmission engineer at Ford, the last three in transmission cooling, is what I'm using for homework. When I worked there (I left earlier this year) I had plenty of data that showed that chart is only useful to scare people into more expensive fluid and bigger coolers. Sometimes they are needed, but that chart is NOT accurate.
Would you care to share that "plenty of data" so the rest of us don't have to take your word for it? Accuracy is exactly what I look for. If you have data, please... Do tell...
When I worked there (I left earlier this year) I had plenty of data
Note the past tense that I highlighted. I had plenty of data at Ford. It belongs to Ford, and I left it there. It isn't mine to share. You can either believe what my experience is telling you, or you can believe something else. Your call.
Note the past tense that I highlighted. I had plenty of data at Ford. It belongs to Ford, and I left it there. It isn't mine to share. You can either believe what my experience is telling you, or you can believe something else. Your call.
Moderators, can you shed some light on the credability of the claims here. I know you are not referees, but you also have a broad view of a poster's history that some of us "short timers" may not.
That temp chart above is as useful as the dealer mentioned above! Both are worse than useless.
That chart MIGHT have been right with 1960's type ATFs and seals. It isn't even close to being right with modern transmissions and ATFs.
You can go up to 250F for a half hour at a time with NO damage. Above 250 you are getting to a place where you don't want your trans to go. For steardy state operation you shouldn't go over 220F.
These temps are in the pan or test port. The temps in the line to the cooler is going to be hotter.
Mark, thanks for the info. I was thinking the upper limit would have to be higher with modern fluids.
Moderators, can you shed some light on the credability of the claims here. I know you are not referees, but you also have a broad view of a poster's history that some of us "short timers" may not.
WTF? I don't have a problem with Mark's credibility. Why would anybody?
My 18+ years as a transmission engineer at Ford, the last three in transmission cooling, is what I'm using for homework.
Only a pinhead would have a problem with this and ask for more data.
Obviously I have offended many by asking for some credability confirmation for Mark. But, since so many people have come to his defence (and rightly so) perhaps that will give the poster who was dubious the evidence he needs to take Mark's word for it.
Moderators, can you shed some light on the credability of the claims here.
You didn't offend me. I don't know how to prove it, and I don't know the moderators all that well. That should help my credibility!
I used to post over 5 years ago, then disappeared. For reasons I won't go into now I posted under the name Casey_1 for the last 5 years. I changed back to my name last week.
You didn't offend me. I don't know how to prove it, and I don't know the moderators all that well. That should help my credibility!
I used to post over 5 years ago, then disappeared. For reasons I won't go into now I posted under the name Casey_1 for the last 5 years. I changed back to my name last week.
Mark I'm glad to hear that. I've heard your name around and believe you have a good reputation. The difficulkty with the internet is that anyone can claim anything, and they frequently do. I have been thrilled with the quality of information I get from this board.
In large part the quality of that info is controlled by the moderators who can help to sniff out fakes. I know you're not one, but the guy asking for the "homework" may not have.
Thanks for putting up with those of us who don't know and have to ask people like you who do know. Thanks for tolerating those of us that might even doubt your skill (though I am not among them). Your patience with those who have been "bamboozeled" by frauds in the past is a credit to your wisdom.
I did a google search for Mark Kovalsky and found all sorts of stuff - it looks like he's been on many forums including The Diesel Stop, RV Escapees, F150 Online, OpenRoadForum (rv.net), and of course, here. Without looking at the profile for each of those forums, it looks like his been around for quite a few years - he's even authored a few tech articles.
So I think credability can be easily established.
Now to recoupe mine - Mark K, I posted above that graph that i use it as a "gauge"... i didn't say it was the gospel.
With your background, can you provide some 'enlightenment' and dispel some of the 'urban legends' about tranny temps and how to gauge/control them?