Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

300 six compression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 10:53 PM
  #1  
Andrew Tuning's Avatar
Andrew Tuning
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Kuna, ID
Question 300 six compression

What is considered "low" compression for a '93 F-150? What should the compression be on a "new" engine? I ask because my truck is lacking in power... SERIOUSLY lacking in power. But, at 266,000 miles, why not? I just tested it and the highest cylinder was at 160psi and the lowest was 150psi... I think I had heard somewhere that new was ~200psi? Don't want to sound like an idiot but I don't want to waste $$$ if I don't have to...

-Andy
'93 F150
'69 F100
'59 F100
'01 Focus
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 11:39 PM
  #2  
andym's Avatar
andym
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,402
Likes: 38
From: Bonita Springs FL
Low would be 120 or less. 150 to 160 in all six is fine. New might be closer to 180, but not much more than that. I'd look elsewhere for your power loss. Maybe a clogged exhaust?
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 08:57 AM
  #3  
Bruce R Leech's Avatar
Bruce R Leech
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 707
Likes: 1
From: Mulege south Baja ca. Mx.
mine at 100,000 miles is 180 PSI in all 6 cyl and that is cold and dry.


yours still sounds fine, you might get another 150,000 these 4.9s never die if you take care of them
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 12:34 PM
  #4  
Andrew Tuning's Avatar
Andrew Tuning
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Kuna, ID
Question

Originally Posted by andym
Low would be 120 or less. 150 to 160 in all six is fine. New might be closer to 180, but not much more than that. I'd look elsewhere for your power loss. Maybe a clogged exhaust?
The exhaust (and specifically the Catalytic Converter) is about 2 years old. Ran it all new from just behind the O2 sensor w/ 2 5/8" pipe and a single cat instead of dual...

The reason I originaly started chasing compression:

My wife and I were coming back from Pocatello, ID hauling a 380# motorcycle in a 500# trailer. It was all the truck could do to pull ANY kind of hill above 50mph. The engine was working at 60 to 65 on flats and would fly going down hill... Now, let me answer the first question. The wheel bearings on the trailer are good. Been there, checked that on the side of the road. They weren't even warm.

But, when I got home, the front of the trailer, my bike, and the tailgate of the truck, were covered in motor oil, so was the inside of the tail pipe...



-Andy
'93 F150
'69 F100
'59 F100
'01 Focus
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 01:32 PM
  #5  
Bruce R Leech's Avatar
Bruce R Leech
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 707
Likes: 1
From: Mulege south Baja ca. Mx.
what do the plugs look like? could be valv seals.
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 02:42 PM
  #6  
Andrew Tuning's Avatar
Andrew Tuning
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Kuna, ID
Originally Posted by Bruce R Leech
what do the plugs look like? could be valv seals.
Funny you ask that. The plugs looked really good (only been in 6 months or so) but 2 of them had red deposites. #5 had deposites that came from between the plug base and the insulator on the OUTSIDE. #3 had them just around the insulator on the inside.
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 08:26 PM
  #7  
Bruce R Leech's Avatar
Bruce R Leech
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 707
Likes: 1
From: Mulege south Baja ca. Mx.
well I wonder where that oil is coming frome. is it doing it all of the time?
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 08:54 PM
  #8  
Bruce R Leech's Avatar
Bruce R Leech
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 707
Likes: 1
From: Mulege south Baja ca. Mx.
with your compression being that high it would almost half to be the Valve guide seals. they will tend to pass more oil when you are going down hill not under lode. in all of those miles have you ever done any head work?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 11:16 PM
  #9  
sconut1's Avatar
sconut1
Senior User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Are the lifters on a 300 manual or hydraulic? I'm told that 100 is low, with no more than 10% variation between cylinders allowed, and you're certainly within tolerance of this, with much highter compression values so it's doubtful that you have a compression issue. If the valves can be adjusted, maybe this is a thought? As mentioned earlier, maybe valve seals? Just for S&Gs, have you looked at the crankcase ventilation system? PCV valve or any of that stuff? The PVC is just a shot in the dark, and it probobly wont affect your performance, but I'm kind of thinking out loud here about your oil issue. I know some of the 3.0 L Chrysler stuff had issues with crancase ventilation components and it caused excessive oil consumption.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 04:03 AM
  #10  
Andrew Tuning's Avatar
Andrew Tuning
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Kuna, ID
Originally Posted by Bruce R Leech
with your compression being that high it would almost half to be the Valve guide seals. they will tend to pass more oil when you are going down hill not under lode. in all of those miles have you ever done any head work?
The most work done to this truck EVER: New reman trans from Man Trans in Florida. While it was out It got a new clutch and slave. otherwise, regular oil changes and basic maintenance.

The lifters are hydrauic... I'm thinking that my issues are several things conspiring against me to frustrait the @#$! out of me. I'm gonna take it to Ford and have them check the injector pressures and test the high pressure pump I have been told it has...

While it is there, I'm gonna have them check the tie rod ends and ball joints and maybe just a general safety inspection of the truck. If I'm gonna have to drive this thing another 300,000 miles... Oh, and while I'm at it, they should probably look into the CRACK that has developed in the lower rear corner of the passenger side door jamb and also see what it's gonna take to reattach the right side of the dash to its mount...

-Andy
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 09:42 AM
  #11  
Bruce R Leech's Avatar
Bruce R Leech
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 707
Likes: 1
From: Mulege south Baja ca. Mx.
at 266,000 miles with out ever having to do anything to the engine am thinking the oil in the exost is valve seals. and with your compression still being good you can change them with out pulling the head. I have done this many times and it is not to bad of a job.

the other option would be to pull the head and do a good valve job. even though it doesn't realy need it yet it is something that will be needed soon . usually the 300 needs head work at about 250,000 or so. also it is about time to start thinking about a cam timing gear set and it would be easier to do at the same time. then you will be set for that next 300,000 miles


that 300 will run for ever I put 450,000 on one and sold it and now it has almost 550,000 on it and is still running strong. it had a valve job at 250,000
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 02:47 PM
  #12  
Andrew Tuning's Avatar
Andrew Tuning
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Kuna, ID
Question

Originally Posted by Bruce R Leech
the other option would be to pull the head and do a good valve job. even though it doesn't realy need it yet it is something that will be needed soon . usually the 300 needs head work at about 250,000 or so. also it is about time to start thinking about a cam timing gear set and it would be easier to do at the same time. then you will be set for that next 300,000 miles


that 300 will run for ever I put 450,000 on one and sold it and now it has almost 550,000 on it and is still running strong. it had a valve job at 250,000
Now, what will the new valves do to the rings? Compairing apples to oranges here but my brother had an '87 Honda I put a new head on it, did nothing to the bottom end, and it blew the rings out the bottom...
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #13  
Bruce R Leech's Avatar
Bruce R Leech
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 707
Likes: 1
From: Mulege south Baja ca. Mx.
it wont do anything to the bottom end and you don't need to even your valves are sealing pretty good with 150 compression but your valve guides are getting louse and that will let your valves start to lose there seal soon. all you really need at this point is new valve seals but they wont last very long without doing the guides also. and it will not clause any problems with the rings and pistons.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 07:31 PM
  #14  
sconut1's Avatar
sconut1
Senior User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Definitely install new guides if you do seals. I made that mistake once myself! Thanks for the info on the hydraulic vs. manual lifters. I had no clue on the 300 what they were.
 
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2007 | 06:56 AM
  #15  
96f150's Avatar
96f150
Fleet Mechanic
25 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 2
From: In my House
Thinkin outloud here also, butI would lean towards a crankcase ventilation issue. I would def change that pcv valve. If your truck had that hard of a time pulling that hill, your manifold would have been red hot.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE