Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

E85 in F250?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 25, 2007 | 10:50 AM
  #1  
scram98400jm's Avatar
scram98400jm
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Question E85 in F250?

Anyone try 50% E85 ina FORD gas engine yet? Guys at work were running it 50/50 MIX in a viariey of car,trucks etc w/o any problems. I don't really plan on doing it but just curious if anyone tried it?
Thanks
04 F250 V8
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2007 | 11:46 AM
  #2  
ReAX's Avatar
ReAX
Post Fiend
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,007
Likes: 4
From: Central Florida
From what I understand, it's a really low octane fuel. Even mixed 50/50 I wouldn't trust it with a good tune. If your still stock it could work, but I think you would lose enough power to hate it.
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2007 | 01:49 PM
  #3  
redford's Avatar
redford
FTE Leadership Emeritus
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 23,174
Likes: 1,678
From: Stephensville WI
Club FTE Gold Member
No, it isn't low octane. E85 has an octane rating ranging from 100-105.

The problem with E-85 is that when mixed at the ratio your engine wants to mix gasoline, you run very very lean. You will probaby end up bunring a piston or three. Gasoline burns at around 12-14 parts air to one part fuel. E-85 burns at 8 parts air to one part fuel. Most gasoline engines aren't equipped to inject enough fuel into the engine to make the 8:1 ratio. Flex fuel engines are equipped with injectors that can send enough fuel to the engine and the program map is wide enough it can handle 8:1.


I won't even get into the possible damage due to the corrosive properties of E-85. Flex fuel vehicles have stuff like stainless steel fuel tanks to handle the fuel.

You could make a gas engine into a flex fuel vehicle if you replaced the injectors with injectors that flowed about twice what the stock injectors flow, replace the oxygen sensor with a wideband sensor and reprogrammed the computer to handle it all.
 

Last edited by redford; May 25, 2007 at 01:51 PM.
Reply
Old May 25, 2007 | 01:56 PM
  #4  
ReAX's Avatar
ReAX
Post Fiend
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,007
Likes: 4
From: Central Florida
That's what it was, volumetricly lean, more ethenol required than gas per air.

Wasn't there also a problem with the tempature the ethenol creates being much lower than gas and causing a loss in power?
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2007 | 03:48 PM
  #5  
redford's Avatar
redford
FTE Leadership Emeritus
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 23,174
Likes: 1,678
From: Stephensville WI
Club FTE Gold Member
A properly designed engine can accomodate the lower temp with higher compression, taking advantage of the higher octane.


If some fool is running 50% E-85 in his tank, I would be curious to see how his car runs one year from now.
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2007 | 04:26 PM
  #6  
Izzy351's Avatar
Izzy351
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,541
Likes: 2
From: Dallas-Ft. Worth
Engines designed to run E85 have larger injectors and are able to sense the mix of ethanol to Gasoline ratio. My 3.0L Ranger ran GREAT on the stuff!! For the record, E85 means 85% Ethanol, 15% Gasoline. They denature it with gas for two reasons -- to LOWER the octane a bit (pure ethanol has like a 115 octane rating, IIRC), and so people won't drink it.

The catch is that you use more fuel because the computer compensates for the ethanol (hence the larger injectors) because ethanol actually contains a molecule of oxygen -- the optimal mix is a bit less air and a bit more fuel. You basically take about a 15% hit on your mileage -- but since it's about 30c cheaper, it's a wash. It is a cleaner, better running fuel IMHO, and I kind of liked putting my $$$ in our farmers' pockets instead of OPEC's. I've heard folks have run E85 in non-E85 vehicles for years without any problems, but I think I'd stick to using it in vehicles made for it. I'm not sure if there's a hit on mileage running it in a non-E85 vehicle, though -- it may just not run as well on the stuff. Of course, the 50/50 mix may be okay, too. If you wanted to run it full time, you could build a higher compression engine and it would probably be just as efficient as gasoline. The compromise is that since most of us still need to run straight gasoline, you can't have a ~16:1 compression engine that'll do that. Maybe once E85 becomes more available, that would be a viable option. Until then, it would be tough. Maybe they'll design a variable-compression engine that runs efficiently on both sometime...

I researched E85 when I had my Ranger, but that's about all I know about it -- I've since bought a diesel F250, so I haven't kept up with it any further.

Joe
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #7  
kelro's Avatar
kelro
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: KS
I have done it a few times but not on a regular basis as I am 80 miles from the nearest E85 pump and at the time it got higher than gas. It needs to be at least $.30 lower to make it feasible. I have filled with E85 when I was as low as a 1/4 tank with no major consequences other than increased rate of consumption and a little rough idle. I wouldn't go over a 50-50 blend if doing it all the time and be watchful of heavy loading the vehicle while burning it. It does have the higher octane but it will still make the engine ping on a high horsepower chip setting.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdale85f150
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Jun 14, 2017 09:15 AM
Bugzilla46310
6.2L V8
16
Oct 10, 2016 06:33 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD
2009 - 2014 F150
35
Jun 29, 2016 01:33 PM
AB328
2015 - 2020 F150
24
Jan 5, 2016 08:43 PM
Tom in NH
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
12
Sep 14, 2015 06:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE